World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans-Balder Havenith

Hans-Balder Havenith

Hans-Balder Havenith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hans-Balder Havenith between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hans-Balder Havenith published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 26 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 13 publications
1999 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hans-Balder Havenith: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 0
2001 0
2002 4
2003 6
2004 2
2005 3
2006 8
2007 6
2008 6
2009 8
2010 5
2011 2
2012 4
2013 19
2014 6
2015 18
2016 20
2017 14
2018 9
2019 10
2020 19
2021 18
2022 22
2023 10
2024 13
2025 13
Total 247
Download as CSV

Hans-Balder Havenith publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Balder Havenith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Hans-Balder Havenith D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Balder Havenith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hans-Balder Havenith is affiliated with the University of Liège in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Engineering. Within these disciplines, they focus on areas including Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geophysics, Mechanics of Materials, Atmospheric Science, and Civil and Structural Engineering.

The scientist's work extensively addresses topics related to landslides and related hazards, seismic waves and analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, rock mechanics and modeling, cryospheric studies and observations, seismic performance and analysis, and flood risk assessment and management.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Anne-Sophie Mreyen, Léna Cauchie, Yawar Hussain, Romy Schlögel, and A. Braun, reflecting collaborations across multiple projects and studies.

Their publications often appear in recognized venues, with a significant number published in Geosciences. Other common platforms for their work include Engineering Geology, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Landslides, and Remote Sensing.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Hans-Balder Havenith include:

  • "Topographic and near-surface stratigraphic amplification of the seismic response of a mountain slope revealed by field monitoring and numerical simulations," 2020, Engineering Geology
  • "Recent technological and methodological advances for the investigation of landslide dams," 2021, Earth-Science Reviews
  • "An Integrated Approach of Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, and GIS Data for the Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," 2022, Land
  • "Review on the Geophysical and UAV-Based Methods Applied to Landslides," 2022, Remote Sensing
  • "Dynamic numerical modelling of co-seismic landslides using the 3D distinct element method: Insights from the Balta rockslide (Romania)," 2022, Engineering Geology

Best Publications

  • Failure mechanism and kinematics of the deadly June 24th 2017 Xinmo landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China

    Xuanmei Fan;Qiang Xu;Gianvito Scaringi;Lanxin Dai

  • Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations measurements, processing and interpretation

    Hans-Balder Havenith

  • What we have learned from the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake and its aftermath: A decade of research and challenges

    Xuanmei Fan;C. Hsein Juang;Janusz Wasowski;Runqiu Huang

  • Site effect analysis around the seismically induced Ananevo, Rockslide, Kyrgyzstan

    Hans-Balder Havenith;Denis Jongmans;Ezio Faccioli;Kanatbeck Abdrakhmatov

  • Initiation of earthquake-induced slope failure: influence of topographical and other site specific amplification effects

    Hans-Balder Havenith;M. Vanini;D. Jongmans;E. Faccioli

  • Seismic triggering of landslides, Part A: Field evidence from the Northern Tien Shan

    H.-B. Havenith;A. Strom;D. Jongmans;D. Jongmans;A. Abdrakhmatov

  • Site effects modelling applied to the slope affected by the Suusamyr earthquake (Kyrgyzstan, 1992)

    Céline Bourdeau;Hans-Balder Havenith

  • Analysis of three-component ambient vibration array measurements

    Donat Fäh;Gabriela Stamm;Hans-Balder Havenith

  • Probabilistic PGA and Arias Intensity maps of Kyrgyzstan (Central Asia)

    K. Abdrakhmatov;Hans-Balder Havenith;Delphine Delvaux;D. Jongmans

  • Tien Shan Geohazards Database: Earthquakes and landslides

    Hans-Balder Havenith;Alexander Strom;Isakbek Torgoev;Almazbek Torgoev

  • Geophysical investigation and dynamic modelling of unstable slopes: case-study of Kainama (Kyrgyzstan)

    Gaëlle Danneels;Céline Bourdeau;I. Torgoev;Hans-Balder Havenith

  • Topographic and near-surface stratigraphic amplification of the seismic response of a mountain slope revealed by field monitoring and numerical simulations

    Yonghong Luo;Yonghong Luo;Xuanmei Fan;Runqiu Huang;Yunsheng Wang

  • Recent technological and methodological advances for the investigation of landslide dams

    Xuanmei Fan;Anja Dufresne;Jim Whiteley;Jim Whiteley;Ali P. Yunus

  • Analysis of landslide susceptibility in the Suusamyr region, Tien Shan: statistical and geotechnical approach

    Hans-Balder Havenith;Hans-Balder Havenith;Alexander Strom;Fernando Caceres;Eric Pirard

  • Landslides in the Mailuu-Suu Valley, Kyrgyzstan—Hazards and Impacts

    Hans-Balder Havenith;Isakbek Torgoev;A. Meleshko;Y. Alioshin

  • Automatic landslide detection from remote sensing images using supervised classification methods

    G. Danneels;E. Pirard;H.-B. Havenith

  • The deformation of the Egersund–Ogna anorthosite massif, south Norway: finite-element modelling of diapirism

    Jean-Dominique Barnichon;Hans-Balder Havenith;Benoit Hoffer;Robert Charlier

  • Seismic hazard assessment of the Kivu rift segment based on a new seismotectonic zonation model (western branch, East African Rift system)

    Damien Delvaux;Jean-Luc Mulumba;Mwene Ntabwoba Stanislas Sebagenzi;Silvanos Fiama Bondo

  • From Non-invasive Site Characterization to Site Amplification: Recent Advances in the Use of Ambient Vibration Measurements

    P.-Y. Bard;H. Cadet;B. Endrun;M. Hobiger

  • GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF SEISMICALLY INDUCED SURFACE EFFECTS: CASE STUDY OF A LANDSLIDE IN THE SUUSAMYR VALLEY, KYRGYZSTAN

    H.-B. Havevith;D. Jongmans;K. Abdrakhmatov;P. Trefois

Frequent Co-Authors

Damien Delvaux
Damien Delvaux Royal Museum for Central Africa
Olivier Dewitte
Olivier Dewitte Royal Museum for Central Africa
Denis Jongmans
Denis Jongmans Grenoble Alpes University
Donat Fäh
Donat Fäh Swiss Seismological Service
François Kervyn
François Kervyn Royal Museum for Central Africa
Klaus Reicherter
Klaus Reicherter RWTH Aachen University
Qiang Xu
Qiang Xu Chengdu University of Technology
Nathalie Fagel
Nathalie Fagel University of Liège
Gianvito Scaringi
Gianvito Scaringi Charles University
C.J. van Westen
C.J. van Westen University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, and many students seek flexible learning options through online programs. Exploring cheapest online spanish degree offerings can serve as a model for affordability and time efficiency when considering Earth Science degrees online. Cost and duration remain key factors for prospective students balancing education with career and personal commitments.

Military veterans interested in transitioning into scientific fields might find value in programs tailored for their unique experiences. Just as there are dedicated online spanish degree for military veterans options, veterans pursuing Earth Science degrees can benefit from specialized support and flexible delivery methods.

Beyond traditional science degrees, interdisciplinary approaches are gaining traction. For example, programs similar to online mfa degrees highlight how creative and scientific education can merge, offering career pathways that integrate Earth Science with arts and communication.

Additionally, leadership and management skills are vital in Earth Science careers. Pursuing an online human resource management masters programs can complement technical expertise, preparing graduates for roles that require overseeing teams, projects, and organizational dynamics.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Balder Havenith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles