World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8545 7895 3636 3292 84 6086

Todd E. Feinberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Todd E. Feinberg between 1974 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Todd E. Feinberg published across 48 years, from 1974 to 2021, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2000. 3 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2000. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 9 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication
1974 2021

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Todd E. Feinberg: publications per year, 1974 to 2021
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 5
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 3
1992 2
1993 0
1994 4
1995 3
1996 1
1997 5
1998 2
1999 1
2000 9
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 7
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 3
2011 5
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 0
2016 7
2017 3
2018 1
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
Total 85
Download as CSV

Todd E. Feinberg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd E. Feinberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 84
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Todd E. Feinberg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd E. Feinberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Todd E. Feinberg is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research spans the fields of engineering and environmental science, with a focus on specialized subfields including water science and technology, civil and structural engineering, and ocean engineering.

Their work centers on topics related to the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, water systems and optimization, and water resources management and optimization. These thematic areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach to managing and improving critical resource systems.

Feinberg has contributed to the academic community through publications in recognized scholarly venues. A notable recent paper is titled "Integrated water-power system resiliency quantification, challenge and opportunity," published in 2021 in the journal Energy Strategy Reviews.

  • Integrated water-power system resiliency quantification, challenge and opportunity (2021, Energy Strategy Reviews)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers across related areas, including Mohammad Roni, Thomas Mosier, Timothy McJunkin, Ange-Lionel Toba, and Liam D Boire. These collaborations reflect a network of partnerships contributing to their research output.

  • Mohammad Roni
  • Thomas Mosier
  • Timothy McJunkin
  • Ange-Lionel Toba
  • Liam D Boire

Feinberg's research contributions have been primarily disseminated in venues focused on energy and environmental strategy, with Energy Strategy Reviews serving as a frequent publication outlet. This indicates a concentration on energy-related environmental challenges.

  • Energy Strategy Reviews

Best Publications

  • Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology

    Martha J. Farah;Todd E. Feinberg

  • Two alien hand syndromes

    Todd E. Feinberg;Rachel J. Schindler;Natalie Gilson Flanagan;Laurence D. Haber

  • The 'resting-state hypothesis' of major depressive disorder-a translational subcortical-cortical framework for a system disorder.

    Georg Northoff;Christine Wiebking;Todd Feinberg;Jaak Panksepp

  • Where in the brain is the self

    Todd E. Feinberg;Julian Paul Keenan

  • Dissociation between linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural systems: a case for compositionality.

    David P. Corina;Howard Poizner;Ursula Bellugi;Todd Feinberg

  • The neuroanatomy of asomatognosia and somatoparaphrenia

    Todd E Feinberg;Annalena Venneri;Anna Maria Simone;Yan Fan

  • Altered Egos: How the Brain Creates the Self

    Todd E. Feinberg

  • Brain imaging of the self - Conceptual, anatomical and methodological issues

    Georg Northoff;Pengmin Qin;Todd E. Feinberg;Todd E. Feinberg

  • Differential impact of right and left hemisphere lesions on facial emotion and object imagery

    D. Bowers;L. X. Blonder;T. Feinberg;K. M. Heilman

  • Illusory limb movements in anosognosia for hemiplegia

    Todd E Feinberg;David M Roane;Jeffrey Ali

  • The Lost Self: Pathologies of the Brain and Identity

    Todd E. Feinberg;Julian Paul Keenan

  • The evolutionary and genetic origins of consciousness in the Cambrian Period over 500 million years ago

    Todd E. Feinberg;Jon Mallatt

  • Associative Visual Agnosia and Alexia Without Prosopagnosia

    Todd E. Feinberg;Rachel J. Schindler;Rachel J. Schindler;Elizabeth Ochoa;Peter C. Kwan

  • Anosognosia and asomatognosia during intracarotid amobarbital inactivation

    Kimford J. Meador;D. W. Loring;T. E. Feinberg;G. P. Lee

  • The Ancient Origins of Consciousness

    Todd E. Feinberg;Jon M. Mallatt

  • Multimodal agnosia after unilateral left hemisphere lesion

    Todd E. Feinberg;Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi;Kenneth M. Heilman

  • Patient-based approaches to cognitive neuroscience

    Martha J. Farah;Todd E. Feinberg

  • Neuropathologies of the self: Clinical and anatomical features

    Todd E. Feinberg

  • The nature of primary consciousness. A new synthesis.

    Todd E. Feinberg;Jon Mallatt

  • Apraxia After a Superior Parietal Lesion

    Kenneth M. Heilman;Leslie Gonzalez Rothi;Linda Mack;Todd Feinberg

  • Delusional Misidentification in Association With Parkinsonism

    David M. Roane;John D. Rogers;Jessica H. Robinson;Todd E. Feinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha J. Farah
Martha J. Farah University of Pennsylvania
Julian Paul Keenan
Julian Paul Keenan Montclair State University
Georg Northoff
Georg Northoff University of Ottawa
Igor Galynker
Igor Galynker Mount Sinai Beth Israel
Kenneth M. Heilman
Kenneth M. Heilman University of Florida
Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi
Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi University of Florida
Annalena Venneri
Annalena Venneri Brunel University London
Irene Daum
Irene Daum Ruhr University Bochum
Joan C. Borod
Joan C. Borod City University of New York
Anna Abraham
Anna Abraham University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience students often explore related fields to complement their studies or expand career options. Popular choices include psychology, counseling, and social work—fields that offer both flexible academic pathways and diverse career prospects.

For students looking to advance rapidly, accelerated psychology programs and 1 year msw programs offer intensive, fast-paced curricula, enabling you to earn a degree in a shorter time frame. These programs are ideal for those wanting to enter the workforce or move into specialized roles quickly.

If counseling is your interest, choosing the right institution is crucial. Pursue high-quality, recognized degrees from cacrep accredited schools, which ensure rigorous training and improved job prospects. Seeking budget-friendly options? Explore online counseling programs that offer both affordability and flexibility for working adults.

Each pathway offers unique strengths, so consider your career goals, desired pace, and accreditation standards before deciding.

Best Scientists Citing Todd E. Feinberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles