World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
7858
World Ranking
8478
National Ranking
55

Troels W. Kjaer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Troels W. Kjaer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 189 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Troels W. Kjaer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Troels W. Kjaer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Troels W. Kjaer is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans multiple fields, with primary focus areas in Medicine and Neuroscience. Within these main fields, their work extends into subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies. Other notable topics include Cancer Survivorship and Care, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, and Neurological Disorders and Treatments.

Troels W. Kjaer has contributed to several frequent publication venues, indicating active involvement in diverse areas of medical and neurological research. These venues include:

  • Anticancer Research
  • In Vivo
  • Epilepsia
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Coauthorship is a prominent feature of their scholarly work. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Dirk Rades (22 joint publications)
  • Steven E. Schild (19 joint publications)
  • Jonas Duun-Henriksen (17 joint publications)
  • SOEREN TVILSTED (17 joint publications)
  • Christian Sandøe Musaeus (11 joint publications)

Recent publications by Troels W. Kjaer reflect a focus on electroencephalography for neurological conditions and cognition. Selected papers include:

  • "A new era in electroencephalographic monitoring? Subscalp devices for ultra-long-term recordings," 2020, Epilepsia
  • "The Self and Its Prolonged Intrinsic Neural Timescale in Schizophrenia," 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "Changes in the left temporal microstate are a sign of cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Brain and Behavior
  • "Signal quality and power spectrum analysis of remote ultra long-term subcutaneous EEG," 2021, Epilepsia
  • "Seizure forecasting using minimally invasive, ultra-long-term subcutaneous electroencephalography: Individualized intrapatient models," 2022, Epilepsia

The research topics of these papers emphasize long-term EEG monitoring techniques, cognitive decline markers in neurodegenerative diseases, and seizure prediction methodologies. Troels W. Kjaer's body of work is characterized by interdisciplinary approaches combining neurology, psychiatry, and advanced electrophysiological techniques.

Best Publications

  • Parietal cortex and representation of the mental Self

    Hans C. Lou;Hans C. Lou;Hans C. Lou;Bruce Luber;Michael Crupain;Julian P. Keenan

  • Increased dopamine tone during meditation-induced change of consciousness

    Troels W Kjaer;Camilla Bertelsen;Paola Piccini;David Brooks

  • Reflective self-awareness and conscious states: PET evidence for a common midline parietofrontal core.

    Troels W. Kjaer;Markus Nowak;Hans C. Lou

  • A 15O-H2O PET study of meditation and the resting state of normal consciousness

    Hans C. Lou;Troels W. Kjaer;Lars Friberg;Gordon Wildschiodtz

  • LATENCY : ANOTHER POTENTIAL CODE FOR FEATURE BINDING IN STRIATE CORTEX

    T. J. Gawne;T. W. Kjaer;B. J. Richmond

  • Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest

    Erik Westhall;Andrea O. Rossetti;Anne Fleur Van Rootselaar;Troels Wesenberg Kjaer

  • Detection of generalized tonic–clonic seizures by a wireless wrist accelerometer: A prospective, multicenter study

    Sándor Beniczky;Tilman Polster;Troels W. Kjaer;Helle Hjalgrim

  • Information flow and temporal coding in primate pattern vision.

    Joshua Heller;John A. Hertz;Troels W. Kjær;Barry J. Richmond

  • A new era in electroencephalographic monitoring? Subscalp devices for ultra–long‐term recordings

    Jonas Duun-Henriksen;Maxime Baud;Mark P Richardson;Mark Cook

  • Interrater variability of EEG interpretation in comatose cardiac arrest patients.

    Erik Westhall;Ingmar Rosén;Andrea O. Rossetti;Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

  • Adjacent Visual Cortical Complex Cells Share About 20% of Their Stimulus-Related Information

    Timothy J. Gawne;Troels W. Kjaer;John A. Hertz;Barry J. Richmond

  • Regional cerebral blood flow during light sleep--a H(2)(15)O-PET study.

    Troels W. Kjaer;Ian Law;Gordon Wiltschiøtz;Olaf B. Paulson

  • Decoding cortical neuronal signals: Network models, information estimation and spatial tuning

    Troels W. Kjaer;John A. Hertz;Barry J. Richmond

  • Precuneus-prefrontal activity during awareness of visual verbal stimuli.

    T. W. Kjaer;M. Nowak;Klaus Wilbrandt Kjær;A. R. Lou

  • Channel selection for automatic seizure detection

    Jonas Duun-Henriksen;Jonas Duun-Henriksen;Troels Wesenberg Kjaer;Rasmus Elsborg Madsen;Line Sofie Remvig

  • Ultra-long-term subcutaneous home monitoring of epilepsy-490 days of EEG from nine patients.

    Sigge Weisdorf;Jonas Duun-Henriksen;Marianne J. Kjeldsen;Marianne J. Kjeldsen;Frantz R. Poulsen;Frantz R. Poulsen

  • Ear-EEG detects ictal and interictal abnormalities in focal and generalized epilepsy - A comparison with scalp EEG monitoring.

    I.C. Zibrandtsen;P. Kidmose;C.B. Christensen;T.W. Kjaer

  • The mental self.

    Hans C. Lou;Markus Nowak;Troels W. Kjaer

  • Nitric oxide does not act as a mediator coupling cerebral blood flow to neural activity following somatosensory stimuli in rats.

    Qiong Wang;Troels Kjaer;Martin B. Jørgensen;Olaf B. Paulson

  • Beyond the double banana: improved recognition of temporal lobe seizures in long-term EEG.

    Ivana Rosenzweig;András Fogarasi;Birger Johnsen;Jørgen Alving

  • Fluorescence-activated cell sorted rat islet cells and studies of the insulin secretory process

    Josefsen K;Stenvang Jp;Kindmark H;Berggren Po

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven E. Schild
Steven E. Schild Mayo Clinic
Sándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky Aarhus University Hospital
Jens J. Holst
Jens J. Holst University of Copenhagen
Lise Tarnow
Lise Tarnow Steno Diabetes Center
Olaf B. Paulson
Olaf B. Paulson University of Copenhagen
Barry J. Richmond
Barry J. Richmond National Institutes of Health
Martin Fabricius
Martin Fabricius University of Copenhagen
Gunhild Waldemar
Gunhild Waldemar University of Copenhagen
Lars H. Pinborg
Lars H. Pinborg Copenhagen University Hospital
Andrea O. Rossetti
Andrea O. Rossetti University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, exploring flexible learning options is essential. Numerous online certification courses are now available, offering affordable routes to build specialized skills relevant to neuroscience-related fields.

If cost and convenience are priorities, you may benefit from pursuing the cheapest easiest online degree programs. These options can provide foundational knowledge and open doors to entry-level roles or further study.

Many neuroscience graduates pursue careers in healthcare, therapy, or counseling. Exploring msw programs online can prepare you for social work positions where understanding brain and behavior is crucial.

For those interested in behavioral analysis and therapy, bcba masters programs provide a pathway to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, a role in high demand across educational and clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Troels W. Kjaer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles