World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
47
Citations
19729
World Ranking
1230
National Ranking
545

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
53
Citations
23332
World Ranking
3302
National Ranking
970

Mark S. Daskin publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Daskin sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 108 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Mark S. Daskin D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Daskin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For leadership and creative contributions to location optimization and its application to industrial, service, and medical systems.
  • 2004 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Mark S. Daskin is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Business, Management and Accounting, Engineering, and Computer Science. Within these broad areas, their work has a strong focus on several subfields such as Management Information Systems, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

Their research primarily addresses topics related to Supply Chain and Inventory Management, Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management, Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis, Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Facility Location and Emergency Management, and Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods.

Some recent publications include:

  • "An integer L-shaped algorithm for the integrated location and network restoration problem in disaster relief," 2021, Transportation Research Part B Methodological
  • "Pharmaceutical supply chain reliability and effects on drug shortages," 2022, Computers & Industrial Engineering
  • "Mitigation strategies against supply disruption risk: a case study at the Ford Motor Company," 2021, International Journal of Production Research
  • "The benefits (or detriments) of adapting to demand disruptions in a hospital pharmacy with supply chain disruptions," 2024, Health Care Management Science
  • "Improving Simulation Optimization Run Time When Solving for Periodic Review Inventory Policies in a Pharmacy," 2021, 2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)

Frequent co-authors include Lauren L. Czerniak, Mariel S. Lavieri, Burgunda V. Sweet, Karl Renius, and Jennifer Leja.

Their work has appeared in various publication venues such as Computers & Industrial Engineering, Transportation Research Part B Methodological, International Journal of Production Research, Health Care Management Science, and IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering.

Mark S. Daskin has also contributed to book literature, notably publishing "Bite-Sized Operations Management" in 2021 with Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Among their professional recognitions, they were named Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2017 for leadership and creative contributions to location optimization and its application to industrial, service, and medical systems. Additionally, they were made Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2004.

Best Publications

  • Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms, and Applications

    Mark S. Daskin

  • Strategic facility location: A review

    Susan Hesse Owen;Mark S. Daskin

  • Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models

    Saif Benjaafar;Yanzhi Li;M. Daskin

  • A Maximum Expected Covering Location Model: Formulation, Properties and Heuristic Solution

    Mark S. Daskin

  • Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case

    Lawrence V. Snyder;Mark S. Daskin

  • A Joint Location-Inventory Model

    Zuo-Jun Max Shen;Collette Coullard;Mark S. Daskin

  • An inventory-location model: Formulation, solution algorithm and computational results

    Mark S. Daskin;Collette R. Coullard;Zuo Jun Max Shen

  • A bibliography for some fundamental problem categories in discrete location science

    Charles S. Revelle;Horst A. Eiselt;Mark S. Daskin

  • Time Dependent Vehicle Routing Problems: Formulations, Properties and Heuristic Algorithms

    Chryssi Malandraki;Mark S. Daskin

  • A Hierarchical Objective Set Covering Model for Emergency Medical Service Vehicle Deployment

    Mark S. Daskin;Edmund H. Stern

  • Capacitated facility location/network design problems

    Sanjay Melkote;Mark S. Daskin

  • 3 Discrete Network Location Models

    John Current;Mark Daskin;David Schilling

  • A warehouse location-routing problem

    Jossef Perl;Mark S. Daskin

  • A random-key genetic algorithm for the generalized traveling salesman problem

    Lawrence V. Snyder;Mark S. Daskin

  • What You Should Know About Location Modeling

    Mark S. Daskin

  • Planning for Disruptions in Supply Chain Networks

    Lawrence V. Snyder;Maria P. Scaparra;Mark S. Daskin;Richard L. Church

  • Location of Health Care Facilities

    Mark S. Daskin;Latoya K. Dean

  • AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF FACILITY LOCATION AND TRANSPORTATION NETWORK DESIGN

    Sanjay Melkote;Mark S Daskin

  • The stochastic location model with risk pooling

    Lawrence V. Snyder;Mark S. Daskin;Chung Piaw Teo

  • Facility Location in Supply Chain Design

    Mark S. Daskin;Lawrence V. Snyder;Rosemary T. Berger

  • Network and Discrete Location

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanjay Mehrotra
Sanjay Mehrotra Northwestern University
Richard L. Church
Richard L. Church University of California, Santa Barbara
Debra A. DaRosa
Debra A. DaRosa Northwestern University
Zuo-Jun Max Shen
Zuo-Jun Max Shen University of Hong Kong
Frank S. Koppelman
Frank S. Koppelman Northwestern University
Charles ReVelle
Charles ReVelle Johns Hopkins University
Timothy J. Lowe
Timothy J. Lowe University of Iowa
Wallace J. Hopp
Wallace J. Hopp University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John R. Current
John R. Current The Ohio State University
Barry L. Nelson
Barry L. Nelson Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many opt for business-oriented programs like an easiest mba to get into, which offer flexibility and foundational business skills to complement analytical expertise.

Those seeking more accessible options often consider the easy online mba for its streamlined curriculum and adaptable schedule, ideal for working professionals balancing study and career growth.

For advanced leadership roles, pursuing the cheapest dba online program provides affordable doctoral education, focusing on business administration expertise that pairs well with quantitative backgrounds like mathematics.

Additionally, a specialized focus such as an online masters in finance is a popular route for mathematicians seeking careers in finance, risk management, or data analysis, blending quantitative skills with financial acumen.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Daskin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles