World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
39
Citations
10941
World Ranking
2131
National Ranking
903

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
11295
World Ranking
6386
National Ranking
1752

John R. Current publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Current sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

John R. Current D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Current sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

John R. Current is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on various aspects of research and science, although specific details on their publication record, co-authors, and main fields of study are not provided.

Their professional activity is linked to The Ohio State University, an institution known for its wide-ranging contributions to research across multiple disciplines. While there is no available data on recent papers or scholarly articles authored by John R. Current, their role within a major research university implies engagement with academic activities and potential contributions to the scientific community.

Information regarding research topics, subfields of study, or specific areas of scientific focus has not been disclosed. Similarly, there are no records of frequent co-authors or common publication venues to elaborate on collaborative efforts or publication trends.

In terms of scholarly output, there is no verified information about published books or awards won by John R. Current. This absence limits insight into their academic recognition or contributions outside of journal articles.

Despite limited publicly accessible data, John R. Current's association with a research-intensive university situates them within a context of ongoing scientific inquiry and academic involvement. Their work likely encompasses roles in teaching, research, or academic administration aligned with the institution's mission.

Best Publications

  • Vendor selection criteria and methods

    Charles A. Weber;John R. Current;W.C. Benton

  • A MULTIOBJECTIVE APPROACH TO VENDOR SELECTION

    Charles A. Weber;John R. Current

  • An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ

    Charles A. Weber;John Current;Anand Desai

  • 3 Discrete Network Location Models

    John Current;Mark Daskin;David Schilling

  • Theory and methodology

    John Current;Hasan Pirkul

  • Multiobjective analysis of facility location decisions

    John Current;Hokey Min;David Schilling

  • Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection

    Charles A. Weber;John R. Current;Anand Desai

  • An efficient tabu search procedure for the p-Median Problem

    Erik Rolland;David A. Schilling;John R. Current

  • THE COVERING SALESMAN PROBLEM

    John R. Current;David A. Schilling

  • A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the vehicle routing with full container load

    Akio Imai;Akio Imai;Etsuko Nishimura;John R. Current

  • Dynamic facility location when the total number of facilities is uncertain: A decision analysis approach

    John R. Current;Samuel Ratick;Charles S. Revelle

  • The maximum covering/shortest path problem: A multiobjective network design and routing formulation

    J.R. Current;C.S. Re Velle;J.L. Cohon

  • A MODEL TO ASSESS RISK, EQUITY AND EFFICIENCY IN FACILITY LOCATION AND TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

    John R Current;Samuel J Ratick

  • Multiobjective transportation network design and routing problems: Taxonomy and annotation

    John Current;Michael Marsh

  • The median tour and maximal covering tour problems: Formulations and heuristics

    John R. Current;David A. Schilling

  • Multiobjective design of transportation networks: taxonomy and annotation

    John Current;HoKey Min

  • Locating Emergency Warning Sirens

    John Current;Morton O'Kelly

  • The hierarchical network design problem

    John R. Current;Charles S. ReVelle;Jared L. Cohon

  • Elimination of Source A and B Errors in p‐Median Location Problems

    John R. Current;David A. Schilling

  • Analysis of Errors Due to Demand Data Aggregation in the Set Covering and Maximal Covering Location Problems

    John R. Current;David A. Schilling

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles ReVelle
Charles ReVelle Johns Hopkins University
Hasan Pirkul
Hasan Pirkul The University of Texas at Dallas
Richard L. Church
Richard L. Church University of California, Santa Barbara
Mark S. Daskin
Mark S. Daskin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
W. C. Benton
W. C. Benton The Ohio State University
Morton E. O'Kelly
Morton E. O'Kelly The Ohio State University
Hokey Min
Hokey Min Bowling Green State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals transition into business and finance sectors, where analytical and quantitative skills are in high demand.

Those interested in management roles might consider programs like the easiest mba programs, which offer accessible entry without compromising on valuable business education fundamentals. Similarly, if flexibility is a priority, the easiest online mba program options provide online learning environments tailored to working professionals.

For individuals aiming for advanced leadership in business, online doctoral degrees like the online dba programs offer a practical path to deepen expertise while balancing career and study commitments. Additionally, finance-focused graduates may find value in the cheapest online master's in finance, combining affordability with strong potential for lucrative positions.

By leveraging these related online degrees, Mathematics students can broaden their skill set and enhance employability across sectors such as finance, management, and advanced research.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Current

Recently Published Articles