World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
10564
World Ranking
6413
National Ranking
2860

Karrie Karahalios publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karrie Karahalios sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Karrie Karahalios D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karrie Karahalios sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Karrie Karahalios is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Computer Science and Social Sciences, with specific focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science Applications, and Signal Processing.

The main topics of Karahalios's work cover a range of interdisciplinary areas: data visualization and analytics, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, ethics and social impacts of AI, mobile crowdsensing and crowdsourcing, social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, and digital marketing and social media.

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Karahalios include Hari Sundaram, Aditya Parameswaran, Motahhare Eslami, Vinay Koshy, and Eshwar Chandrasekharan.

Publication venues where Karahalios has contributed major works include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Karahalios include:

  • "Auditing Algorithms: Understanding Algorithmic Systems from the Outside In" (2021), published in Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction
  • "At the End of the Day Facebook Does What It Wants" (2020), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Contestability For Content Moderation" (2021), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Auditing Race and Gender Discrimination in Online Housing Markets" (2020), published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "StreamSketch" (2021), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Karahalios's research includes analysis and auditing of algorithmic systems, exploration of race and gender discrimination in digital markets, and aspects of content moderation. Their work also addresses challenges related to misinformation and social media politics through computational and sociotechnical approaches.

They were recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Predicting tie strength with social media

    Eric Gilbert;Karrie Karahalios

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

    Karrie Karahalios;Andrés Monroy-Hernández;Airi Lampinen;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds

    Motahhare Eslami;Aimee Rickman;Kristen Vaccaro;Amirhossein Aleyasen

  • First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds

    Motahhare Eslami;Karrie Karahalios;Christian Sandvig;Kristen Vaccaro

  • DataTone: Managing Ambiguity in Natural Language Interfaces for Data Visualization

    Tong Gao;Mira Dontcheva;Eytan Adar;Zhicheng Liu

  • Visualizing conversation

    J. Donath;K. Karahalios;F. Viegas

  • Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media

    Juhi Kulshrestha;Motahhare Eslami;Johnnatan Messias;Muhammad Bilal Zafar

  • Blogs Are Echo Chambers: Blogs Are Echo Chambers

    Eric Gilbert;Tony Bergstrom;Kyratso George Karahalios

  • Communicating Algorithmic Process in Online Behavioral Advertising

    Motahhare Eslami;Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran;Christian Sandvig;Karrie Karahalios

  • The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life

    Eric Gilbert;Karrie Karahalios;Christian Sandvig

  • Conversation Clock: Visualizing audio patterns in co-located groups

    T. Bergstrom;K. Karahalios

  • A path to understanding the effects of algorithm awareness

    Kevin Hamilton;Karrie Karahalios;Christian Sandvig;Motahhare Eslami

  • Effortless data exploration with zenvisage: an expressive and interactive visual analytics system

    Tarique Siddiqui;Albert Kim;John Lee;Karrie Karahalios

  • User Attitudes towards Algorithmic Opacity and Transparency in Online Reviewing Platforms

    Motahhare Eslami;Kristen Vaccaro;Min Kyung Lee;Amit Elazari Bar On

  • VCode and VData: illustrating a new framework for supporting the video annotation workflow

    Joey Hagedorn;Joshua Hailpern;Karrie G. Karahalios

  • When the algorithm itself is a racist: Diagnosing ethical harm in the basic Components of Software

    Christian Sandvig;Kevin Hamilton;Karrie Karahalios;Cedric Langbort

  • Discovery-based games for learning software

    Tao Dong;Mira Dontcheva;Diana Joseph;Karrie Karahalios

  • Automation, Algorithms, and Politics | When the Algorithm Itself is a Racist: Diagnosing Ethical Harm in the Basic Components of Software

    Christian Sandvig;Kevin Hamilton;Karrie Karahalios;Cedric Langbort

  • I-Living: An Open System Architecture for Assisted Living

    Qixin Wang;Wook Shin;Xue Liu;Zheng Zeng

  • The network in the garden: Designing social media for rural life

    Eric Gilbert;Karrie Karahalios;Christian Sandvig

Frequent Co-Authors

Aditya Parameswaran
Aditya Parameswaran University of California, Berkeley
Eric Gilbert
Eric Gilbert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton University of Hawaii at Manoa
Hari Sundaram
Hari Sundaram University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brian P. Bailey
Brian P. Bailey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John D. Lee
John D. Lee University of Wisconsin–Madison
Marco Caccamo
Marco Caccamo Technical University of Munich
Darko Marinov
Darko Marinov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fernanda B. Viégas
Fernanda B. Viégas Harvard University
Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of flexible and affordable options, especially through online education. For those seeking a quicker route into the tech workforce, 2 year online degrees can provide foundational skills and credentials in less time than a traditional bachelor's program.

Cost is another crucial factor for many students. Luckily, there are numerous cheap online colleges that offer accredited computer science degrees, making quality education accessible without the burden of large student loans.

Not everyone follows a traditional academic path. Some online graduate schools with low gpa requirements offer students a second chance to pursue advanced degrees, opening doors for career changers or those who may have struggled academically in the past.

With a computing background, your career pathways aren’t limited to traditional tech roles. For instance, pairing computer science with fields like environmental studies can lead to unique opportunities. Discover more about interdisciplinary options such as what can you do with an environmental studies degree to further expand your future career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Karrie Karahalios

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles