World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
22689
World Ranking
3338
National Ranking
1619

Alan Mislove publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Mislove sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alan Mislove D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Mislove sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan Mislove is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their work spans the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Marketing.

The research topics that Mislove has contributed to include:

  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Access Control and Trust
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Mislove has co-authored multiple works with frequent collaborators, including:

  • Dave Levin
  • Piotr Sapieżyński
  • Sune Lehmann
  • Levi Kaplan
  • Taejoong Chung

Several notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Mislove include:

  • Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Tweetin' in the Rain: Exploring Societal-Scale Effects of Weather on Mood, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Broadening Participation in Computing via Ubiquitous Combined Majors (CS+X), 2022, Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
  • Data Deserts and Black Boxes: The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Consumer Profiling, 2024, Management Science
  • Hammurabi, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Their work appears regularly in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
  • Management Science
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Best Publications

  • Measurement and analysis of online social networks

    Alan Mislove;Massimiliano Marcon;Krishna P. Gummadi;Peter Druschel

  • On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook

    Bimal Viswanath;Alan Mislove;Meeyoung Cha;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network

    Meeyoung Cha;Alan Mislove;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users

    Alan Mislove;Sune Lehmann;Yong-Yeol Ahn;Jukka-Pekka Onnela

  • You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks

    Alan Mislove;Bimal Viswanath;Krishna P. Gummadi;Peter Druschel

  • Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for detecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasm

    Bjarke Felbo;Alan Mislove;Anders Søgaard;Iyad Rahwan

  • Analyzing facebook privacy settings: user expectations vs. reality

    Yabing Liu;Krishna P. Gummadi;Balachander Krishnamurthy;Alan Mislove

  • Growth of the flickr social network

    Alan Mislove;Hema Swetha Koppula;Krishna P. Gummadi;Peter Druschel

  • Measuring personalization of web search

    Aniko Hannak;Piotr Sapiezynski;Arash Molavi Kakhki;Balachander Krishnamurthy

  • An analysis of social network-based Sybil defenses

    Bimal Viswanath;Ansley Post;Krishna P. Gummadi;Alan Mislove

  • Measuring Price Discrimination and Steering on E-commerce Web Sites

    Aniko Hannak;Gary Soeller;David Lazer;Alan Mislove

  • Glacier: highly durable, decentralized storage despite massive correlated failures

    Andreas Haeberlen;Alan Mislove;Peter Druschel

  • Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr

    Anikó Hannák;Claudia Wagner;David Garcia;Alan Mislove

  • An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace

    Le Chen;Alan Mislove;Christo Wilson

  • Towards detecting anomalous user behavior in online social networks

    Bimal Viswanath;M. Ahmad Bashir;Mark Crovella;Saikat Guha

  • Exploiting Social Networks for Internet Search

    Alan Mislove;Krishna P. Gummadi;Peter Druschel

  • Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomes

    Muhammad Ali;Piotr Sapiezynski;Miranda Bogen;Aleksandra Korolova

  • Characterizing social cascades in flickr

    Meeyoung Cha;Alan Mislove;Ben Adams;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Ostra: leveraging trust to thwart unwanted communication

    Alan Mislove;Ansley Post;Peter Druschel;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Discrimination through Optimization: How Facebook's Ad Delivery Can Lead to Biased Outcomes

    Muhammad Ali;Piotr Sapiezynski;Miranda Bogen;Aleksandra Korolova

  • The Tweets They Are a-Changin’: Evolution of Twitter Users and Behavior

    Yabing Liu;Chloe Kliman-Silver;Alan Mislove

Frequent Co-Authors

Krishna P. Gummadi
Krishna P. Gummadi Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Christo Wilson
Christo Wilson Northeastern University
David Choffnes
David Choffnes Northeastern University
Peter Druschel
Peter Druschel Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Bruce M. Maggs
Bruce M. Maggs Duke University
Balachander Krishnamurthy
Balachander Krishnamurthy AT&T (United States)
Andreas Haeberlen
Andreas Haeberlen University of Pennsylvania
Sune Lehmann
Sune Lehmann Technical University of Denmark
Cristina Nita-Rotaru
Cristina Nita-Rotaru Northeastern University
David Lazer
David Lazer Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up a variety of career pathways in tech and beyond. When selecting a program, one of the key considerations should be accreditation. Enrolling in online degrees accredited by recognized agencies ensures program quality and employer recognition.

For those interested in creative technology, a online game design degree provides a pathway into the fast-growing video gaming industry. Meanwhile, the demand for cybersecurity experts has never been higher. If you’re seeking both affordability and flexibility, check out the cheapest cybersecurity degree programs offered online.

Computer Science skills also translate well into diverse industries. For example, those interested in leadership roles may benefit from an online construction management degree, blending technology with project management. Carefully reviewing your options can help you find a program that aligns with both your career goals and your budget.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Mislove

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles