World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
6753
World Ranking
11540
National Ranking
4742

Andreas Haeberlen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Haeberlen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 93 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andreas Haeberlen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Haeberlen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Haeberlen is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research activities primarily focus on the field of Computer Science, with a specialization in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their work spans various topics including Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs), and Cryptography and Data Security.

Haeberlen's recent publications include:

  • Testing differential privacy with dual interpreters, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Testing Differential Privacy with Dual Interpreters, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors in Haeberlen's research are Hengchu Zhang, Edo Roth, Benjamin C. Pierce, and Aaron Roth. These collaborations have contributed to their scholarly output across multiple papers.

Their publications have appeared primarily in the following venues:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Practical robust localization over large-scale 802.11 wireless networks

    Andreas Haeberlen;Eliot Flannery;Andrew M. Ladd;Algis Rudys

  • PeerReview: practical accountability for distributed systems

    Andreas Haeberlen;Petr Kouznetsov;Peter Druschel

  • Characterizing residential broadband networks

    Marcel Dischinger;Andreas Haeberlen;Krishna P. Gummadi;Stefan Saroiu

  • Efficient replica maintenance for distributed storage systems

    Byung-Gon Chun;Frank Dabek;Andreas Haeberlen;Emil Sit

  • Glacier: highly durable, decentralized storage despite massive correlated failures

    Andreas Haeberlen;Alan Mislove;Peter Druschel

  • Differential Privacy: An Economic Method for Choosing Epsilon

    Justin Hsu;Marco Gaboardi;Andreas Haeberlen;Sanjeev Khanna

  • A case for the accountable cloud

    Andreas Haeberlen

  • Differential privacy under fire

    Andreas Haeberlen;Benjamin C. Pierce;Arjun Narayan

  • Linear dependent types for differential privacy

    Marco Gaboardi;Andreas Haeberlen;Justin Hsu;Arjun Narayan

  • Secure network provenance

    Wenchao Zhou;Qiong Fei;Arjun Narayan;Andreas Haeberlen

  • Accountable virtual machines

    Andreas Haeberlen;Paarijaat Aditya;Rodrigo Rodrigues;Peter Druschel

  • Detecting bittorrent blocking

    Marcel Dischinger;Alan Mislove;Andreas Haeberlen;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Proactive replication for data durability

    Emil Sit;Andreas Haeberlen;Frank Dabek;Byung-Gon Chun

  • Peer-assisted content distribution in Akamai netsession

    Mingchen Zhao;Paarijaat Aditya;Ang Chen;Yin Lin

  • Big data analytics over encrypted datasets with seabed

    Antonis Papadimitriou;Ranjita Bhagwan;Nishanth Chandran;Ramachandran Ramjee

  • DJoin: differentially private join queries over distributed databases

    Arjun Narayan;Andreas Haeberlen

  • The case for Byzantine fault detection

    Andreas Haeberlen;Petr Kouznetsov;Peter Druschel

  • Challenges in experimenting with botnet detection systems

    Adam J. Aviv;Andreas Haeberlen

  • Let SDN Be Your Eyes: Secure Forensics in Data Center Networks

    Adam Bates;Kevin Butler;Andreas Haeberlen;Micah Sherr

  • The NEBULA Future Internet Architecture

    Tom Anderson;Ken Birman;Robert Broberg;Matthew Caesar

  • Diagnosing missing events in distributed systems with negative provenance

    Yang Wu;Mingchen Zhao;Andreas Haeberlen;Wenchao Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Boon Thau Loo
Boon Thau Loo University of Pennsylvania
Peter Druschel
Peter Druschel Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Benjamin C. Pierce
Benjamin C. Pierce University of Pennsylvania
Aaron Roth
Aaron Roth University of Pennsylvania
Zachary G. Ives
Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania
Krishna P. Gummadi
Krishna P. Gummadi Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Hakim Weatherspoon
Hakim Weatherspoon Cornell University
Alan Mislove
Alan Mislove Northeastern University
Jonathan M. Smith
Jonathan M. Smith University of Pennsylvania
Stefan Saroiu
Stefan Saroiu Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways across the tech and business landscape. A strong technical background can help you succeed in a growing number of high-demand professions beyond traditional software development.

For example, combining computing with financial expertise is possible through the best online accounting program, which prepares graduates for roles in fintech, auditing, or data analysis. If your interests lean toward justice, security, or public service, a criminal justice degree online accredited can blend technology with law enforcement or cybersecurity.

Data and analytics careers are booming as well, making online data science programs an excellent choice for those wishing to advance in artificial intelligence, machine learning, or big data fields. Meanwhile, students interested in infrastructure or project management can accelerate their growth with a construction management bachelor degree, a valuable pathway as digital transformation reshapes construction industries.

Exploring these alternative or complementary online degrees helps you build a multidisciplinary skill set and increases your versatility in today’s rapidly changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Haeberlen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles