World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 46 5184 4992 1005 999 245 7794

Yonghong Liu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yonghong Liu between 2004 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yonghong Liu published across 18 years, from 2004 to 2021, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2020. 54 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 27 publications
2004 2021

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yonghong Liu: publications per year, 2004 to 2021
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 2
2007 3
2008 7
2009 7
2010 7
2011 12
2012 26
2013 24
2014 17
2015 17
2016 14
2017 16
2018 12
2019 24
2020 27
2021 27
Total 243
Download as CSV

Yonghong Liu publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yonghong Liu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 245 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260 245
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Yonghong Liu D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yonghong Liu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301 46
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics
  • Electrical engineering

His primary areas of study are Metallurgy, Reliability engineering, Machining, Electrical discharge machining and Scanning electron microscope. His Reliability engineering study combines topics in areas such as Blowout preventer, Dynamic Bayesian network, Bayesian network and Subsea. His Machining research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Rotational speed, Electric discharge, Machine tool and Pulse generator.

His work carried out in the field of Electric discharge brings together such families of science as Silicon carbide and Ceramic. His study explores the link between Electrical discharge machining and topics such as Forensic engineering that cross with problems in Kerosene and Emulsion. His Scanning electron microscope research incorporates elements of Surface roughness, Titanium alloy and Crevice corrosion.

His most cited work include:

  • Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network (186 citations)
  • Study of the recast layer of a surface machined by sinking electrical discharge machining using water-in-oil emulsion as dielectric (107 citations)
  • Investigation on the influence of the dielectrics on the material removal characteristics of EDM (87 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Yonghong Liu mainly investigates Machining, Electrical discharge machining, Composite material, Metallurgy and Subsea. The Machining study combines topics in areas such as Engineering drawing, Silicon carbide, Ceramic, Surface roughness and Microstructure. While the research belongs to areas of Electrical discharge machining, Yonghong Liu spends his time largely on the problem of Dielectric, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Emulsion.

His study in Metallurgy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Rotational speed and Scanning electron microscope. His Subsea research includes elements of Blowout preventer, Reliability engineering and Sensitivity. His work deals with themes such as Control system and Dynamic Bayesian network, Bayesian network, which intersect with Reliability engineering.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Machining (24.21%)
  • Electrical discharge machining (23.68%)
  • Composite material (18.42%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Composite material (18.42%)
  • Dynamic Bayesian network (7.37%)
  • Power (3.16%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Yonghong Liu spends much of his time researching Composite material, Dynamic Bayesian network, Power, Reliability engineering and Mechanical engineering. Many of his research projects under Composite material are closely connected to Current density with Current density, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. Yonghong Liu combines subjects such as Algorithm and Deepwater drilling with his study of Dynamic Bayesian network.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Well control, Process and Subsea. His Mechanical engineering research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Development and Chip. His Orders of magnitude study spans across into subjects like Electrical discharge machining and Machining.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Structure Systems Under the Influence of Multiple Causes: Subsea Pipelines as a Case Study (55 citations)
  • Remaining useful life re-prediction methodology based on Wiener process: Subsea Christmas tree system as a case study (11 citations)
  • A dynamic Bayesian network based methodology for fault diagnosis of subsea Christmas tree (11 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics
  • Electrical engineering

Yonghong Liu focuses on Dynamic Bayesian network, Chemical engineering, Water splitting, Non-blocking I/O and Corrosion. The various areas that Yonghong Liu examines in his Dynamic Bayesian network study include Reliability engineering, Missing data, Subsea and Degradation. His work on Maintenance engineering as part of general Reliability engineering research is frequently linked to Data modeling, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Yonghong Liu usually deals with Subsea and limits it to topics linked to Absolute difference and Fault. His Chemical engineering study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Honeycomb structure, Honeycomb, Electrolysis and Nickel. Corrosion is a primary field of his research addressed under Composite material.

Best Publications

  • Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Qian Fan;Yunwei Zhang

  • Availability-Based Engineering Resilience Metric and Its Corresponding Evaluation Methodology

    Baoping Cai;Baoping Cai;Min Xie;Yonghong Liu;Yiliu Liu

  • Application of Bayesian Networks in Reliability Evaluation

    Baoping Cai;Xiangdi Kong;Yonghong Liu;Jing Lin

  • Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Structure Systems Under the Influence of Multiple Causes: Subsea Pipelines as a Case Study

    Baoping Cai;Xiaoyan Shao;Yonghong Liu;Xiangdi Kong

  • Investigation on the influence of the dielectrics on the material removal characteristics of EDM

    Yanzhen Zhang;Yonghong Liu;Yang Shen;Renjie Ji

  • Study of the recast layer of a surface machined by sinking electrical discharge machining using water-in-oil emulsion as dielectric

    Yanzhen Zhang;Yonghong Liu;Renjie Ji;Baoping Cai

  • Machining performance of silicon carbide ceramic in end electric discharge milling

    Renjie Ji;Yonghong Liu;Yanzhen Zhang;Fei Wang

  • Using Bayesian networks in reliability evaluation for subsea blowout preventer control system

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Zengkai Liu;Xiaojie Tian

  • A dynamic Bayesian networks modeling of human factors on offshore blowouts

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Yunwei Zhang;Qian Fan

  • Compound machining of titanium alloy by super high speed EDM milling and arc machining

    Fei Wang;Yonghong Liu;Yanzhen Zhang;Zemin Tang

  • Application of Bayesian networks in quantitative risk assessment of subsea blowout preventer operations.

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Zengkai Liu;Xiaojie Tian

  • Remaining useful life re-prediction methodology based on Wiener process: Subsea Christmas tree system as a case study

    Baoping Cai;Hongyan Fan;Xiaoyan Shao;Yonghong Liu

  • Resilience evaluation methodology of engineering systems with dynamic-Bayesian-network-based degradation and maintenance

    Baoping Cai;Yanping Zhang;Haifeng Wang;Yonghong Liu

  • Influence of dielectric and machining parameters on the process performance for electric discharge milling of SiC ceramic

    Renjie Ji;Yonghong Liu;Yanzhen Zhang;Baoping Cai

  • An experimental study of crevice corrosion behaviour of 316L stainless steel in artificial seawater

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Xiaojie Tian;Fei Wang

  • Data-driven early fault diagnostic methodology of permanent magnet synchronous motor

    Baoping Cai;Keke Hao;Zhengda Wang;Chao Yang

  • Fault detection and diagnostic method of diesel engine by combining rule-based algorithm and BNs/BPNNs

    Baoping Cai;Xiutao Sun;Jiaxing Wang;Chao Yang

  • Risk assessment on deepwater drilling well control based on dynamic Bayesian network

    Zengkai Liu;Qiang Ma;Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu

  • Dynamic Bayesian networks based performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventers in presence of imperfect repair

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Yunwei Zhang;Qian Fan

  • Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of reliability of subsea blowout preventer stack in presence of common cause failures

    Zengkai Liu;Yonghong Liu;Baoping Cai;Dawei Zhang

  • Machining Performance of Inconel 718 Using High Current Density Electrical Discharge Milling

    Fei Wang;Yonghong Liu;Yang Shen;Renjie Ji

  • Real-time reliability evaluation methodology based on dynamic Bayesian networks: A case study of a subsea pipe ram BOP system.

    Baoping Cai;Yonghong Liu;Yunpeng Ma;Zengkai Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Baoping Cai
Baoping Cai China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Renjie Ji
Renjie Ji China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Gunther Wittstock
Gunther Wittstock Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Wenfeng Ding
Wenfeng Ding Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Min Xie
Min Xie City University of Hong Kong
Suet To
Suet To Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Dongzhou Jia
Dongzhou Jia Qingdao University of Technology
Jing Lin
Jing Lin Shenzhen University
Xianmin Zhang
Xianmin Zhang South China University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Yonghong Liu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles