World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
11032
World Ranking
5312
National Ranking
2443

Robert A. Greenes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Greenes sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 263 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert A. Greenes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Greenes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Robert A. Greenes is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields, including computer science, health professions, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Key subfields of focus include molecular biology, health information management, information systems, information systems and management, and artificial intelligence.

Their research covers multiple topics, notably biomedical text mining and ontologies, electronic health records systems, scientific computing and data management, research data management practices, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, data quality and management, and bone health and osteoporosis research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Robert A. Greenes comprise Guilherme Del Fiol, Blackford Middleton, Bruce E. Bray, Rachel Richesson, and Gerald Perry.

The scientist has published in several venues with notable frequency, including:

  • Learning Health Systems
  • Scientific Reports
  • Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
  • Information Services & Use
  • Nature Communications

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Robert A. Greenes include:

  • "Categorizing metadata to help mobilize computable biomedical knowledge," 2021, Learning Health Systems
  • "Machine learning approaches for the prediction of bone mineral density by using genomic and phenotypic data of 5130 older men," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Summary of second annual MCBK public meeting: Mobilizing Computable Biomedical Knowledge-A movement to accelerate translation of knowledge into action," 2020, Learning Health Systems
  • "Don Lindberg's Influence on Future Generations: The U.S. National Library of Medicine's Biomedical Informatics Research Training Programs," 2022, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
  • "Summary of fourth annual MCBK public meeting: Mobilizing computable biomedical knowledge-metadata and trust," 2021, Learning Health Systems

Robert A. Greenes was awarded membership in the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1999.

Best Publications

  • Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

    I. Sim;P. Gorman;R. A. Greenes;R. B. Haynes

  • Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

    Colin B. Begg;Robert A. Greenes

  • Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.

    Mor Peleg;Samson W. Tu;Jonathan Bury;Paolo Ciccarese

  • The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines.

    Lucila Ohno-Machado;John H. Gennari;Shawn N. Murphy;Nilesh L. Jain

  • GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines

    Aziz A. Boxwala;Mor Peleg;Samson Tu;Omolola Ogunyemi

  • GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format.

    Mor Peleg;Aziz A. Boxwala;Omolola Ogunyemi;Qing T. Zeng

  • Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead

    Robert A. Greenes

  • Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system.

    Jen Her Wu;Wen Shen Shen;Li Min Lin;Robert Greenes

  • Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models.

    Dongwen Wang;Mor Peleg;Samson W Tu;Aziz A Boxwala

  • Design and implementation of a clinical data management system

    R.A. Greenes;A.N. Pappalardo;C.W. Marble;G.Octo Barnett

  • Clinical decision support models and frameworks: Seeking to address research issues underlying implementation successes and failures.

    Robert A. Greenes;Robert A. Greenes;David W. Bates;Kensaku Kawamoto;Blackford Middleton

  • Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine

    Dongwen Wang;Mor Peleg;Samson W. Tu;Aziz A. Boxwala

  • Characteristics of consumer terminology for health information retrieval.

    Qing Zeng;S. Kogan;N. Ash;R. A. Greenes

  • SAPHIRE—an information retrieval system featuring concept matching, automatic indexing, probabilistic retrieval, and hierarchical relationships

    William R. Hersh;Robert A. Greenes

  • SMART--an integrated wireless system for monitoring unattended patients.

    Dorothy W. Curtis;Esteban J. Pino;Jacob M. Bailey;Eugene I. Shih

  • Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias

    Robert Gray;Colin B. Begg;Robert A. Greenes

  • Positive attitudes and failed queries: an exploration of the conundrums of consumer health information retrieval

    Qing T. Zeng;Sandra Kogan;Robert M. Plovnick;Jonathan Crowell

  • Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients.

    Robert A. Greenes;Colin B. Begg

  • Methods of Cognitive Analysis to Support the Design and Evaluation of Biomedical Systems

    Vimla L Patel;José F Arocha;Melissa Diermeier;Robert A Greenes

  • Improving Clinical Guidelines with Logic and Decision-table Techniques Application to Hepatitis Immunization Recommendations

    Richard N. Shiffman;Robert A. Greenes

  • GLIF3: A Representation Format for Sharable Computer-Interpretable Clinical Practice

    Aziz A. Boxwala;Mor Peleg;Samson W. Tu;Omolola Ijeoma Ogunyemi

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward H. Shortliffe
Edward H. Shortliffe Columbia University
Samson W. Tu
Samson W. Tu Stanford University
Mor Peleg
Mor Peleg University of Haifa
Lucila Ohno-Machado
Lucila Ohno-Machado University of California, San Diego
Vimla L. Patel
Vimla L. Patel Columbia University
Elmer V. Bernstam
Elmer V. Bernstam The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Colin B. Begg
Colin B. Begg Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
James J. Cimino
James J. Cimino University of Alabama at Birmingham
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Peter J. Haug
Peter J. Haug University of Utah

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related fields. Today, online learning makes it easier than ever to gain specialized knowledge in high-demand industries.

If you are interested in cybersecurity, you may want to explore online cybersecurity master's programs. These programs offer advanced skills for protecting data and networks—a growing necessity for businesses and governments.

For those fascinated by both technology and leadership, a construction management degree is a smart choice. This pathway blends technical skills with project management, preparing graduates to lead construction projects of all sizes.

Budget matters, too. For prospective students keeping an eye on costs, researching criminal justice degree price and the cheapest accredited online accounting degree options can help you make informed decisions. These affordable online programs allow you to enter stable and rewarding fields while managing your educational expenses.

No matter your career goal, online degree programs offer flexibility and direct pathways into today’s top career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Greenes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles