World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
127
Citations
72557
World Ranking
2795
National Ranking
1558

Fred Morady publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred Morady sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 813 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Fred Morady D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred Morady sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Fred Morady is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has a research focus predominantly within the field of Medicine, with an emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their body of work spans 86 publications, with 80 specifically related to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, reflecting a concentrated interest in cardiac conditions and treatments.

Their research covers multiple subfields of study including Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. The major topics addressed in their research include cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, cardiovascular effects of exercise, cardiovascular function and risk factors, and cardiovascular syncope and autonomic disorders.

Frequent publication venues illustrate the scope of their dissemination with notable journals including the Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology, Heart Rhythm, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and the Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. Among these, six publications appeared in the Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, five in JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology, and four in Heart Rhythm.

Several coauthors have collaborated regularly with Morady, the most frequent being Michael Ghannam, Rakesh Latchamsetty, Krit Jongnarangsin, Frank Bogun, and Jackson J. Liang. Each of these collaborators has coauthored multiple papers in the cardiovascular electrophysiology domain alongside Morady.

Key recent publications include:

  • Effect of metformin on outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (2021, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology)
  • Stepwise Approach for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Predominantly Intramural Scar (2020, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology)
  • Mapping and Ablation of Intramural Ventricular Arrhythmias (2020, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology)
  • Clinical significance of myocardial scar in patients with frequent premature ventricular complexes undergoing catheter ablation (2020, Heart Rhythm)
  • Value of mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia targets within the coronary venous system in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (2020, Heart Rhythm)

Morady's contributions to the field include a broad focus on arrhythmias and interventions including catheter ablation techniques and the clinical implications of myocardial scarring and ventricular tachycardia management. They have also been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Hugh Calkins;Josep Brugada;Douglas L. Packer;Riccardo Cappato

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Hugh Calkins;Josep Brugada;Douglas L. Packer;Ricardo Cappato

  • Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P. Knight;Hiroshi Tada;Mehmet Özaydın

  • User interface for tissue ablation system

    Randell L. Werneth;J. Christopher Flaherty;Oral Hakan;Fred Morady

  • Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.

    Hakan Oral;Carlo Pappone;Aman Chugh;Eric Good

  • Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Segmental Pulmonary Vein Ostial Ablation Versus Left Atrial Ablation

    Hakan Oral;Christoph Scharf;Aman Chugh;Burr Hall

  • Atrio-esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Carlo Pappone;Hakan Oral;Vincenzo Santinelli;Gabriele Vicedomini

  • Catheter-Induced Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction to Control Refractory Supraventricular Arrhythmias

    Melvin M. Scheinman;Fred Morady;David S. Hess;Rolando Gonzalez

  • Diagnosis and Cure of the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome or Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardias during a Single Electrophysiologic Test

    Hugh Calkins;João Sousa;Rafel el-Atassi;Shimon Rosenheck

  • Amiodarone versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator:randomized trial in patients with nonischemicdilated cardiomyopathy and asymptomaticnonsustained ventricular tachycardia—AMIOVIRT ☆

    S.Adam Strickberger;John D Hummel;Thomas G Bartlett;Howard I Frumin

  • Relationship between burden of premature ventricular complexes and left ventricular function.

    Timir S. Baman;Dave C. Lange;Karl J. Ilg;Sanjaya K. Gupta

  • Preoperative Amiodarone as Prophylaxis Against Atrial Fibrillation After Heart Surgery

    Emile G. Daoud;S. Adam Strickberger;K. Ching Man;Rajiva Goyal

  • Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease.

    Fred Morady;Mark Harvey;Steven J. Kalbfleisch;Rafel El-Atassi

  • Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections in 250 patients. Abbreviated therapeutic approach to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

    H Calkins;J Langberg;J Sousa;R el-Atassi

  • Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Complex Electrograms

    Hakan Oral;Aman Chugh;Eric Good;Alan Wimmer

  • Effect of Atrial Fibrillation on Atrial Refractoriness in Humans

    Emile G. Daoud;Frank Bogun;Rajiva Goyal;Mark Harvey

  • Radiofrequency ablation of frequent, idiopathic premature ventricular complexes: comparison with a control group without intervention.

    Frank Bogun;Thomas Crawford;Stephen Reich;Todd M. Koelling

  • Clinical significance of early recurrences of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P Knight;Mehmet Özaydın;Hiroshi Tada

Frequent Co-Authors

Hakan Oral
Hakan Oral University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frank Pelosi
Frank Pelosi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frank Bogun
Frank Bogun University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bradley P. Knight
Bradley P. Knight Northwestern University
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Hugh Calkins
Hugh Calkins Johns Hopkins University
Melvin M. Scheinman
Melvin M. Scheinman University of California, San Francisco
William G. Stevenson
William G. Stevenson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Karl-Heinz Kuck Universität Hamburg
Ella A. Kazerooni
Ella A. Kazerooni University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying medicine in the USA but are considering alternative or complementary career paths, there are several rewarding online degrees to explore. Many students pursue healthcare careers through flexible online programs, which can fast-track entry into the medical field and build practical experience.

For those seeking a quick entry into nursing, fast LPN program options offer accelerated learning to help you join the workforce sooner. If your interest lies in mental health, pmhnp online programs can prepare you for advanced practice in psychiatric care.

Beyond clinical roles, management and administrative pathways are also available. A variety of health administration degrees online enable students to learn healthcare leadership skills remotely and flexibly. For those seeking graduate-level training, the most affordable online MHA programs deliver advanced knowledge in healthcare management and policy.

Each of these online degrees opens doors to in-demand healthcare careers, offering flexible options for students who require adaptable schedules or wish to build diverse skill sets within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Fred Morady

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles