World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 42 4899 4538 410 398 129 6129

Austen Worth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Austen Worth between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Austen Worth published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 25 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1987 2025

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Austen Worth: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 3
2007 0
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 5
2014 5
2015 3
2016 9
2017 8
2018 13
2019 13
2020 15
2021 17
2022 12
2023 15
2024 14
2025 11
Total 154
Download as CSV

Austen Worth publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Austen Worth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 129 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150 129
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Austen Worth D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Austen Worth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91 42
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Austen Worth is affiliated with Great Ormond Street Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine, with a focus on immunology and microbiology.

Their work concentrates on several subfields, including immunology, genetics, epidemiology, hematology, and oncology. The main topics addressed in their publications include immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, blood disorders and treatments, cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immune cell function and interaction, autoimmune and inflammatory disorders research, and genomics and rare diseases.

Austen Worth has contributed to numerous papers. Significant recent publications include:

  • Phage Therapy of Mycobacterium Infections: Compassionate Use of Phages in 20 Patients With Drug-Resistant Mycobacterial Disease (2022), published in Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Whole-genome sequencing of a sporadic primary immunodeficiency cohort (2020), published in Nature
  • Hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe combined immunodeficiency: The SCETIDE 2006-2014 European cohort (2021), published in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Extended clinical and immunological phenotype and transplant outcome in CD27 and CD70 deficiency (2020), published in Blood
  • Neuroinflammatory Disease as an Isolated Manifestation of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Immunology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Austen Worth include Kanchan Rao, Judith Breuer, Claire Booth, Andrew R. Gennery, and Alexandra Y. Kreins.

Their research is often published in venues such as the Journal of Clinical Immunology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Blood, and Clinical Immunology.

Best Publications

  • The extended phenotype of LPS-responsive beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency

    Laura Gámez-Díaz;Dietrich August;Polina Stepensky;Shoshana Revel-Vilk

  • Long-term follow-up of IPEX syndrome patients after different therapeutic strategies: An international multicenter retrospective study

    Federica Barzaghi;Laura Cristina Amaya Hernandez;Benedicte Neven;Silvia Ricci

  • Two novel activating mutations in the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein result in congenital neutropenia

    Phil J. Ancliff;Michael P. Blundell;Giles O. Cory;Yolanda Calle

  • Whole-genome sequencing of a sporadic primary immunodeficiency cohort

    Thaventhiran Jed.;H Lango Allen;O S Burren;W Rae

  • Loss-of-function nuclear factor κB subunit 1 (NFKB1) variants are the most common monogenic cause of common variable immunodeficiency in Europeans

    Paul Tuijnenburg;Hana Lango Allen;Hana Lango Allen;Siobhan O. Burns;Daniel Greene;Daniel Greene

  • Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome: molecular basis of disease and clinical phenotype.

    Austen Worth;Adrian J. Thrasher;Adrian J. Thrasher;H. Bobby Gaspar;H. Bobby Gaspar

  • Omission of in vivo T-cell depletion promotes rapid expansion of naïve CD4+ cord blood lymphocytes and restores adaptive immunity within 2 months after unrelated cord blood transplant.

    Robert Chiesa;Kimberly Gilmour;Waseem Qasim;Stuart Adams

  • Long-term outcome of LRBA deficiency in 76 patients after various treatment modalities as evaluated by the immune deficiency and dysregulation activity (IDDA) score

    Victoria Katharina Tesch;Hassan Abolhassani;Hassan Abolhassani;Bella Shadur;Bella Shadur;Joachim Zobel

  • WIP Regulates the Stability and Localization of WASP to Podosomes in Migrating Dendritic Cells

    Hsiu-Chuan Chou;Inés M. Antón;Mark R. Holt;Claudia Curcio

  • T-cell receptor αβ+ and CD19+ cell–depleted haploidentical and mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary immune deficiency

    Ravi M. Shah;Reem Elfeky;Zohreh Nademi;Waseem Qasim

  • Thymus Transplantation for Complete Digeorge Syndrome: European Experience

    E. Graham Davies;E. Graham Davies;Melissa Cheung;Kimberly Gilmour;Jesmeen Maimaris

  • The Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome: The Actin Cytoskeleton and Immune Cell Function

    Michael P. Blundell;Austen Worth;Gerben Bouma;Adrian J. Thrasher

  • Inherited p40phox deficiency differs from classic chronic granulomatous disease

    Annemarie Van De Geer;Alejandro Nieto-Patlán;Alejandro Nieto-Patlán;Alejandro Nieto-Patlán;Douglas B. Kuhns;Anton T.J. Tool

  • Risk factors predisposing to the development of hypogammaglobulinemia and infections post-Rituximab.

    Evangelos A A Christou;Giuliana Giardino;Austen Worth;Fani Ladomenou

  • Human cytomegalovirus haplotype reconstruction reveals high diversity due to superinfection and evidence of within-host recombination.

    Juliana Cudini;Sunando Roy;Charlotte J. Houldcroft;Josephine M. Bryant

  • Pre-emptive rituximab based on viraemia and T cell reconstitution: a highly effective strategy for the prevention of Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease following stem cell transplantation.

    Austen Worth;Austen Worth;Rachel Conyers;Jonathon Cohen;Mamta Jagani

  • Identifying functional defects in patients with immune dysregulation due to LRBA and CTLA-4 mutations

    Tie Zheng Hou;Nisha Verma;Jennifer Wanders;Alan Kennedy

  • Treosulfan and Fludarabine Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Primary Immunodeficiency: UK Experience

    Mary A. Slatter;Kanchan Rao;Intan Juliana Abd Hamid;Intan Juliana Abd Hamid;Zohreh Nademi

  • Characterization of the clinical and immunologic phenotype and management of 157 individuals with 56 distinct heterozygous NFKB1 mutations

    Tiziana Lorenzini;Manfred Fliegauf;Nils Klammer;Natalie Frede

  • Hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe combined immunodeficiency: The SCETIDE 2006-2014 European cohort.

    Arjan C. Lankester;Benedicte Neven;Nizar Mahlaoui;Erik G.J. von Asmuth

  • A new functional assay for the diagnosis of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency.

    S. Ammann;S. Ammann;R. Elling;M. Gyrd-Hansen;G. Dückers

  • Extended clinical and immunological phenotype and transplant outcome in CD27 and CD70 deficiency

    Sujal Ghosh;Sevgi Köstel Bal;Sevgi Köstel Bal;Emily S.J. Edwards;Emily S.J. Edwards;Bethany Pillay;Bethany Pillay

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian J. Thrasher
Adrian J. Thrasher University College London
Siobhan O. Burns
Siobhan O. Burns University College London
Persis Amrolia
Persis Amrolia Great Ormond Street Hospital
Paul Veys
Paul Veys Great Ormond Street Hospital
Andrew R. Gennery
Andrew R. Gennery Newcastle University
Mary Slatter
Mary Slatter Newcastle University
Kimberly Gilmour
Kimberly Gilmour Great Ormond Street Hospital
Judith Breuer
Judith Breuer University College London
Andrew J. Cant
Andrew J. Cant Newcastle University
Sophie Hambleton
Sophie Hambleton Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in immunology, pursuing related healthcare degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Nursing programs, for instance, offer practical routes to engage in patient care with a strong biological and immunological focus. Students looking to enter the field swiftly might explore lpn programs easy to get into, which provide foundational nursing credentials with relatively accessible admissions.

Advancing in nursing can lead to more specialized and autonomous roles. The easiest nurse practitioner program options help professionals build critical skills while balancing flexibility and program rigor. These pathways can be especially valuable for those aiming to work closely in clinical settings with immunological patients.

For mental health and immunological intersections, psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) programs stand out. Prospective students often seek the best pmhnp programs, which emphasize strong clinical placements crucial for gaining real-world experience.

Affordability is another key factor when choosing programs. The cheapest pmhnp programs ensure that students can pursue specialized careers without overwhelming debt, maintaining quality education with budget-friendly options.

Best Scientists Citing Austen Worth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles