World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 41 1913 1769 721 628 242 7355

Mark Sheplak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Sheplak between 1952 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Sheplak published across 74 years, from 1952 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2006. 7 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2006. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1952 2025

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Sheplak: publications per year, 1952 to 2025
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 4
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 13
2002 19
2003 15
2004 13
2005 16
2006 20
2007 15
2008 12
2009 8
2010 9
2011 14
2012 10
2013 8
2014 5
2015 7
2016 11
2017 9
2018 9
2019 6
2020 5
2021 5
2022 1
2023 3
2024 5
2025 2
Total 258
Download as CSV

Mark Sheplak publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Sheplak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 242 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92 242
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Sheplak D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Sheplak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100 41
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Sheplak is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and specializes in Engineering with a focus on several subfields including Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Condensed Matter Physics, and Civil and Structural Engineering.

Their research covers a range of topics primarily centered on Flow Measurement and Analysis, Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows, Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies, GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials, Advanced Sensor Technologies Research, Icing and De-icing Technologies, and Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies.

Recent publications by Mark Sheplak include:

  • Aluminum Scandium Nitride as a Functional Material at 1000 °C, 2025, Advanced Electronic Materials
  • A MEMS-Based Fast-Response Miniature Five-Hole Probe With Optical Pressure Transducers, 2020, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
  • A Flush-Mounted Dual-Axis Wall Shear Stress Sensor, 2020, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
  • Temperature Sensitivity Reduction of a Capacitive Wall Shear Stress Sensor System for Low-Speed Wind Tunnels, 2021, AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
  • A Novel, High-Frequency, Reciprocal Calibration Method for Dynamic Pressure Sensors Used in High-Speed Flows, 2020, AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark Sheplak are:

  • David A. Mills
  • William C. Patterson
  • V. Gaddam
  • Shaurya Dabas
  • Jinghan Gao

Mark Sheplak's work has been published in several well-known venues including:

  • Advanced Electronic Materials
  • Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
  • AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum
  • AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
  • Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials

Best Publications

  • Actuators for Active Flow Control

    Louis N. Cattafesta;Mark Sheplak

  • Modern developments in shear-stress measurement ☆

    Jonathan W. Naughton;Mark Sheplak

  • Lumped Element Modeling of Piezoelectric-Driven Synthetic Jet Actuators

    Quentin Gallas;Ryan Holman;Toshikazu Nishida;Bruce Carroll

  • A MEMS acoustic energy harvester

    S B Horowitz;M Sheplak;L N Cattafesta;T Nishida

  • Acoustic energy harvesting using an electromechanical Helmholtz resonator.

    Fei Liu;Alex Phipps;Stephen Horowitz;Khai Ngo

  • An AlN MEMS Piezoelectric Microphone for Aeroacoustic Applications

    M. D. Williams;B. A. Griffin;T. N. Reagan;J. R. Underbrink

  • A Jet Formation Criterion for Synthetic Jet Actuators

    Yogen Utturkar;Ryan Holman;Rajat Mittal;Bruce Carroll

  • Process compatible polysilicon-based electrical through-wafer interconnects in silicon substrates

    E.M. Chow;V. Chandrasekaran;A. Partridge;T. Nishida

  • Analytical Electroacoustic Model of a Piezoelectric Composite Circular Plate

    Suryanarayana A.N Prasad;Quentin Gallas;Stephen B. Horowitz;Brian D. Homeijer

  • Effect of external strain on the conductivity of AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors

    B. S. Kang;S. Kim;J. Kim;F. Ren

  • Development of a micromachined piezoelectric microphone for aeroacoustics applications.

    Stephen Horowitz;Toshikazu Nishida;Louis Cattafesta;Mark Sheplak

  • A Micromachined Dual-Backplate Capacitive Microphone for Aeroacoustic Measurements

    D.T. Martin;Jian Liu;K. Kadirvel;R.M. Fox

  • MEMS Shear Stress Sensors: Promise and Progress

    Mark Sheplak;Louis Cattafesta;Toshikazu Nishida;Catherine McGinley

  • A multiple degree of freedom electromechanical Helmholtz resonator.

    Fei Liu;Stephen Horowitz;Toshikazu Nishida;Louis Cattafesta

  • Multifrequency Microwave-Induced Thermal Acoustic Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection

    Bin Guo;Jian Li;H. Zmuda;M. Sheplak

  • Wideband RELAX and wideband CLEAN for aeroacoustic imaging.

    Yanwei Wang;Jian Li;Petre Stoica;Mark Sheplak

  • Dynamic calibration of a shear-stress sensor using Stokes-layer excitation

    Mark Sheplak;Aravind Padmanabhan;Martin A. Schmidt;Kenneth S. Breuer

  • Uncertainty analysis of the two-microphone method

    Todd Schultz;Mark Sheplak;Louis N. Cattafesta

  • Micromachined sensors for static and dynamic shear-stress measurements in aerodynamic flows

    A. Padmanabhan;M. Sheplak;K.S. Breuer;M.A. Schmidt

  • Piezoresistive Microphone Design Pareto Optimization: Tradeoff Between Sensitivity and Noise Floor

    M. Papila;R.T. Haftka;T. Nishida;M. Sheplak

  • Constant-beamwidth and constant-powerwidth wideband robust capon beamformers for acoustic imaging

    Zhisong Wang;Jian Li;Petre Stoica;Toshikazu Nishida

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis N. Cattafesta
Louis N. Cattafesta Illinois Institute of Technology
Toshikazu Nishida
Toshikazu Nishida University of Florida
Bhavani V. Sankar
Bhavani V. Sankar University of Florida
Lawrence Ukeiley
Lawrence Ukeiley University of Florida
Khai D. T. Ngo
Khai D. T. Ngo Virginia Tech
Renwei Mei
Renwei Mei University of Florida
Kenneth S. Breuer
Kenneth S. Breuer Brown University
Fan Ren
Fan Ren University of Florida
Stephen J. Pearton
Stephen J. Pearton University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For instance, fields like Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) offer specialized programs that vary widely in their selectivity and accessibility. Understanding the slp grad school acceptance rate is crucial when considering competitive graduate studies in related disciplines.

Many students wonder, can you get a speech pathology degree online? The answer is yes; numerous accredited programs provide flexible online learning options, accommodating diverse schedules and geographic locations.

Cost is another important factor. Prospective students should carefully evaluate the online speech pathology degree tuition and fees to ensure the program fits their financial situation and long-term goals.

Additionally, there are tailored resources for specific groups, such as military members. Veterans considering online degrees will find valuable information about online speech pathology degree for military veterans, offering benefits and support to ease their transition into civilian careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Sheplak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles