World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
4278
World Ranking
8675
National Ranking
4610

Jonathan P. Stange publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Stange sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan P. Stange D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Stange sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan P. Stange is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their recent publications cover various topics within mental health and cognitive processes. Notable papers include: "Effects of mood and aging on keystroke dynamics metadata and their diurnal patterns in a large open-science sample: A BiAffect iOS study" (2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association); "Nonsuicidal self-injury scar concealment from the self and others" (2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research); "A Lifespan Model of Interference Resolution and Inhibitory Control: Risk for Depression and Changes with Illness Progression" (2020, Neuropsychology Review); "A meta-analysis on the uncinate fasciculus in depression" (2023, Psychological Medicine); and "Inflexible autonomic responses to sadness predict habitual and real-world rumination: A multi-level, multi-wave study" (2020, Biological Psychology).

Jonathan P. Stange's work is situated within several core research topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

They have collaborated frequently with fellow researchers such as Scott A. Langenecker, Ellie Xu, Olusola Ajilore, Katie L. Bessette, and Sarah L Zapetis.

Their publications have appeared predominantly in the following venues:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Best Publications

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for nonremitted patients with bipolar disorder.

    Thilo Deckersbach;Britta K. Hölzel;Lori R. Eisner;Jonathan P. Stange

  • Emotional Maltreatment, Peer Victimization, and Depressive versus Anxiety Symptoms During Adolescence: Hopelessness as a Mediator

    Jessica L. Hamilton;Benjamin G. Shapero;Jonathan P. Stange;Elissa J. Hamlat

  • Inflexibility as a Vulnerability to Depression: A Systematic Qualitative Review

    Jonathan P. Stange;Lauren B. Alloy;David M. Fresco

  • Cognitive Vulnerabilities and Depression Versus Other Psychopathology Symptoms and Diagnoses in Early Adolescence

    Lauren B. Alloy;Shimrit K. Black;Mathew E. Young;Kim E. Goldstein

  • Impact of Substance Use Disorders on Recovery From Episodes of Depression in Bipolar Disorder Patients: Prospective Data From the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD)

    Michael J. Ostacher;Roy H. Perlis;Andrew A. Nierenberg;Joseph Calabrese

  • Stress and the Development of Cognitive Vulnerabilities to Depression Explain Sex Differences in Depressive Symptoms during Adolescence.

    Jessica L. Hamilton;Jonathan P. Stange;Lyn Y. Abramson;Lauren B. Alloy

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for bipolar disorder: effects on cognitive functioning.

    Jonathan P. Stange;Lori R. Eisner;Britta K. Hölzel;Andrew D. Peckham

  • Cognitive Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Ideation: A Two Year Longitudinal Study in Adolescence

    Taylor A. Burke;Samantha L. Connolly;Jessica L. Hamilton;Jonathan P. Stange

  • Pubertal timing and vulnerabilities to depression in early adolescence: differential pathways to depressive symptoms by sex.

    Jessica L. Hamilton;Elissa J. Hamlat;Jonathan P. Stange;Lyn Y. Abramson

  • Attenuated intrinsic connectivity within cognitive control network among individuals with remitted depression: Temporal stability and association with negative cognitive styles

    Jonathan P. Stange;Katie L. Bessette;Lisanne M. Jenkins;Amy T. Peters

  • Moderate Childhood Stress Buffers Against Depressive Response to Proximal Stressors: A Multi-Wave Prospective Study of Early Adolescents

    Benjamin G. Shapero;Jessica L. Hamilton;Jonathan P. Stange;Richard T. Liu

  • Rumination and Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory in Adolescents: An Integration of Cognitive Vulnerabilities to Depression

    Elissa J. Hamlat;Samantha L. Connolly;Jessica L. Hamilton;Jonathan P. Stange

  • It Gets Better: Future Orientation Buffers the Development of Hopelessness and Depressive Symptoms following Emotional Victimization during Early Adolescence

    Jessica L. Hamilton;Samantha L. Connolly;Richard T. Liu;Jonathan P. Stange

  • Effects of mood and aging on keystroke dynamics metadata and their diurnal patterns in a large open-science sample: A BiAffect iOS study

    Claudia Vesel;Homa Rashidisabet;John Zulueta;Jonathan P. Stange

  • Cognitive vulnerabilities as predictors of stress generation in early adolescence: pathway to depressive symptoms.

    Jessica L. Hamilton;Jonathan P. Stange;Benjamin G. Shapero;Samantha L. Connolly

  • Early Pubertal Timing as a Vulnerability to Depression Symptoms: Differential Effects of Race and Sex

    Elissa J. Hamlat;Jonathan P. Stange;Lyn Y. Abramson;Lauren B. Alloy

  • Negative inferential style, emotional clarity, and life stress: integrating vulnerabilities to depression in adolescence.

    Jonathan P. Stange;Lauren B. Alloy;Megan Flynn;Lyn Y. Abramson

  • Development of an integrated psychosocial treatment to address the medical burden associated with bipolar disorder.

    Louisa G Sylvia;Andrew A Nierenberg;Jonathan P Stange;Andrew D Peckham

  • Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory, Emotional Maltreatment, and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence: Evidence of a Cognitive Vulnerability-Stress Interaction.

    Jonathan P. Stange;Elissa J. Hamlat;Jessica L. Hamilton;Lyn Y. Abramson

  • INFLEXIBLE COGNITION PREDICTS FIRST ONSET OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE EPISODES IN ADOLESCENCE.

    Jonathan P. Stange;Samantha L. Connolly;Taylor A. Burke;Jessica L. Hamilton

  • Negative cognitive style interacts with negative life events to predict first onset of a major depressive episode in adolescence via hopelessness.

    Naoise Mac Giollabhui;Jessica L Hamilton;Johanna Nielsen;Samantha L Connolly

Frequent Co-Authors

Lauren B. Alloy
Lauren B. Alloy Temple University
Lyn Y. Abramson
Lyn Y. Abramson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Scott A. Langenecker
Scott A. Langenecker University of Utah
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg Harvard University
Thilo Deckersbach
Thilo Deckersbach Harvard University
Louisa G. Sylvia
Louisa G. Sylvia Harvard University
K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
David J. Miklowitz
David J. Miklowitz University of California, Los Angeles
Robert C. Welsh
Robert C. Welsh University of Utah
Evan M. Kleiman
Evan M. Kleiman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career paths, especially in counseling. Today, there is a growing demand for accessible, affordable education that prepares students for real-world roles in mental health services. Many states offer innovative online programs designed to fit various budgets and career goals.

For those seeking value, options such as affordable counseling programs in Utah and most affordable counseling degree programs in Wisconsin provide cost-effective pathways without compromising quality. Students interested in remote learning can benefit from resources like the cheapest online counseling degrees in Florida or the cheapest online counseling programs in Georgia.

These programs often feature flexible learning schedules, making it easier for working adults and non-traditional students to advance their education. Graduates can pursue vital roles as school counselors, mental health counselors, or other human services professionals, helping meet the ongoing need for qualified psychological support in communities nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan P. Stange

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles