World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8917 8328 4733 4307 165 5425

Louisa G. Sylvia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louisa G. Sylvia between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louisa G. Sylvia published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 15 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
2008 2025

185 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louisa G. Sylvia: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 2
2012 4
2013 14
2014 19
2015 15
2016 18
2017 9
2018 14
2019 13
2020 14
2021 21
2022 9
2023 5
2024 10
2025 5
Total 185
Download as CSV

Louisa G. Sylvia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louisa G. Sylvia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 165
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Louisa G. Sylvia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louisa G. Sylvia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Louisa G. Sylvia is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a specific focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Clinical Psychology. They have contributed to Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Physiology.

Their work addresses several main topics, including Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Resilience and Mental Health, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, and Cardiac Health and Mental Health.

Recent publications by Louisa G. Sylvia reflect this broad scope. Notable papers include:

  • "Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder," 2023, published in JAMA
  • "Call to action regarding the vascular-bipolar link: A report from the Vascular Task Force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders," 2020, published in Bipolar Disorders
  • "Estimating the symptom structure of bipolar disorder via network analysis: Energy dysregulation as a central symptom," 2021, published in Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • "Promoting resilience in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic with a brief online intervention," 2021, published in Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • "Moderators of a resiliency group intervention for frontline clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2021, published in Journal of Affective Disorders

Louisa G. Sylvia frequently publishes in specific academic venues. These include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Bipolar Disorders
  • Psychiatric Annals
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Psychiatry Research Communications

Collaboration plays a role in their research, with frequent coauthors being:

  • Andrew A. Nierenberg
  • Alexandra K. Gold
  • Thilo Deckersbach
  • Nevita George
  • Douglas Katz

Best Publications

  • Practical guide to measuring physical activity.

    Louisa G. Sylvia;Emily E. Bernstein;Jane L. Hubbard;Leigh Keating

  • Social rhythm regularity and the onset of affective episodes in bipolar spectrum individuals

    Gail H C Shen;Lauren B Alloy;Lyn Y Abramson;Louisa G Sylvia

  • Sleep Disturbance in Euthymic Bipolar Patients

    Louisa G Sylvia;Jamie M Dupuy;Michael J Ostacher;Michael J Ostacher;Colleen M Cowperthwait

  • Physical Exercise for Treatment of Mood Disorders: A Critical Review.

    C. M. Hearing;W. C. Chang;K. L. Szuhany;T. Deckersbach

  • The role of sleep in bipolar disorder

    Alexandra K Gold;Louisa G Sylvia

  • Medical burden in bipolar disorder: findings from the Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder study (Bipolar CHOICE)

    Louisa G. Sylvia;Richard C. Shelton;David E. Kemp;Emily E. Bernstein

  • Bipolar Spectrum – Substance Use Co-occurrence: Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Sensitivity and Impulsiveness as Shared Personality Vulnerabilities

    Lauren B. Alloy;Rachel E. Bender;Clara A. Wagner;Wayne G. Whitehouse

  • Empirically supported psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder: Current state of the research

    Stephanie Salcedo;Alexandra K. Gold;Sana Sheikh;Peter H. Marcus

  • Association of exercise with quality of life and mood symptoms in a comparative effectiveness study of bipolar disorder.

    Louisa G. Sylvia;Edward S. Friedman;James H. Kocsis;Emily E. Bernstein

  • Lithium treatment moderate-dose use study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of optimized personalized treatment with and without lithium.

    Andrew A. Nierenberg;Edward S. Friedman;Charles L. Bowden;Louisa G. Sylvia

  • General medical burden in bipolar disorder: Findings from the LiTMUS comparative effectiveness trial

    David E Kemp;L. G. Sylvia;Joseph R Calabrese;A. A. Nierenberg

  • Life Events and Social Rhythms in Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: A Prospective Study

    Louisa G. Sylvia;Lauren B. Alloy;Joanna A. Hafner;Marisa C. Gauger

  • Call to action regarding the vascular-bipolar link: A report from the Vascular Task Force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders.

    Benjamin I. Goldstein;Benjamin I. Goldstein;Bernhard T. Baune;Bernhard T. Baune;Bernhard T. Baune;David J. Bond;Pao Huan Chen;Pao Huan Chen

  • Bipolar CHOICE (Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness): A Pragmatic 6-Month Trial of Lithium Versus Quetiapine for Bipolar Disorder

    Andrew A. Nierenberg;Susan L. McElroy;Edward S. Friedman;Terence A. Ketter

  • Nutrition, Exercise, and Wellness Treatment in bipolar disorder: proof of concept for a consolidated intervention

    Louisa G Sylvia;Stephanie Salcedo;Emily E Bernstein;Ji Hyun Baek

  • Transdiagnostic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder and Comorbid Anxiety With the Unified Protocol A Clinical Replication Series

    Kristen K. Ellard;Thilo Deckersbach;Louisa G. Sylvia;Andrew A. Nierenberg

  • Poor quality of life and functioning in bipolar disorder.

    Louisa G. Sylvia;Rebecca E. Montana;Thilo Deckersbach;Michael E. Thase

  • Clinical and health outcomes initiative in comparative effectiveness for bipolar disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): A pragmatic trial of complex treatment for a complex disorder

    Andrew A. Nierenberg;Louisa G. Sylvia;Andrew C. Leon;Noreen A. Reilly-Harrington

  • Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator-1 Alpha as a Novel Target for Bipolar Disorder and Other Neuropsychiatric Disorders

    Andrew A. Nierenberg;Sharmin A. Ghaznavi;Isadora Sande Mathias;Kristen K. Ellard

  • Exercise treatment for bipolar disorder: potential mechanisms of action mediated through increased neurogenesis and decreased allostatic load.

    Louisa G Sylvia;Rebecca M Ametrano;Andrew A Nierenberg

  • A brief review of exercise, bipolar disorder, and mechanistic pathways

    Daniel Thomson;Alyna Turner;Sue Lauder;Margaret E. Gigler

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg Harvard University
Thilo Deckersbach
Thilo Deckersbach Harvard University
Terence A. Ketter
Terence A. Ketter Stanford University
Joseph R. Calabrese
Joseph R. Calabrese Case Western Reserve University
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania
Charles L. Bowden
Charles L. Bowden The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Edward S. Friedman
Edward S. Friedman University of Pittsburgh
Mauricio Tohen
Mauricio Tohen University of New Mexico
Richard C. Shelton
Richard C. Shelton University of Alabama at Birmingham
Susan L. McElroy
Susan L. McElroy University of Cincinnati Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and career avenues, particularly in the mental health field. Many students choose to pursue counseling-related programs, which blend theoretical knowledge with practical skills for supporting individuals facing emotional or psychological challenges.

One critical pathway is becoming a mental health counselor, a role that generally requires a relevant master’s degree and supervised clinical experience. However, requirements can differ based on location. For example, if you're interested in learning how to become a mental health counselor in Omaha, you’ll need to obtain a license through Nebraska’s state board. On the other hand, Orlando mental health counselor certification requirements involve meeting Florida’s unique licensure standards.

Each city may outline distinct educational and clinical prerequisites, as seen in Philadelphia mental health counselor education requirements and the steps to become a mental health counselor in Phoenix. Researching these requirements helps ensure you select the right online degree program for your professional goals and licensure needs.

Best Scientists Citing Louisa G. Sylvia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles