World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
18715
World Ranking
19177
National Ranking
644

Seetal Dodd publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seetal Dodd sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 394 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Seetal Dodd D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seetal Dodd sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Seetal Dodd is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, particularly within Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research spans several specialized subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Biological Psychiatry, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Key research topics addressed by Seetal Dodd encompass Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Tryptophan and Brain Disorders, Treatment of Major Depression, Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Stress Responses and Cortisol, and Mental Health Treatment and Access.

Seetal Dodd has published in various scientific venues with a particular concentration in:

  • Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • CNS Spectrums
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in research include Michael Berk, Olivia Dean, Vicki L. Ellingrod, Ann Arbor, and Jim Gums, indicating a network of partnerships within the psychiatric and pharmacological research communities.

Notable papers associated with Seetal Dodd include:

  • "Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation," 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management," 2023, World Psychiatry
  • "The Role of Mitochondria in Mood Disorders: From Physiology to Pathophysiology and to Treatment," 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study," 2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Effect of Aspirin vs Placebo on the Prevention of Depression in Older People," 2020, JAMA Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Pathways underlying neuroprogression in bipolar disorder : focus on inflammation, oxidative stress and neurotrophic factors

    Michael Berk;Flavio P Kapczinski;Ana Cristina Andreazza;Ana Cristina Andreazza;Olivia Dean;Olivia Dean

  • Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation

    Roger S McIntyre;Roger S McIntyre;Joshua D Rosenblat;Joshua D Rosenblat;Charles B Nemeroff;Gerard Sanacora

  • N-acetylcysteine for antioxidant therapy: pharmacology and clinical utility

    Seetal Dodd;Olivia Dean;David Leon Copolov;Gin S Malhi

  • Dopamine dysregulation syndrome: implications for a dopamine hypothesis of bipolar disorder

    M. Berk;M. Berk;S. Dodd;M. Kauer-Sant'Anna;G. S. Malhi

  • The validity of the 21-item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales as a routine clinical outcome measure.

    Felicity Ng;Thomas Trauer;Seetal Dodd;Tom Callaly

  • A review of vulnerability and risks for schizophrenia: Beyond the two hit hypothesis

    Justin Davis;Harris Eyre;Felice N Jacka;Seetal Dodd

  • C-reactive protein is increased in schizophrenia but is not altered by antipsychotics: meta-analysis and implications.

    Fernandes Bs;Steiner J;Bernstein Hg;Dodd S;Dodd S

  • Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction: An exploration of the inflammatory hypothesis and novel therapies.

    David R Skvarc;Michael Berk;Michael Berk;Linda K Byrne;Olivia M Dean

  • Setting the Stage: From Prodrome to Treatment Resistance in Bipolar Disorder

    Michael Berk;Michael Berk;Philippe Conus;Nellie Lucas;Karen Hallam

  • The validity of the CGI severity and improvement scales as measures of clinical effectiveness suitable for routine clinical use.

    Michael Berk;Felicity Ng;Seetal Dodd;Tom Callaly

  • Biomarkers in bipolar disorder: A positional paper from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Biomarkers Task Force

    Benicio N Frey;Ana C Andreazza;Josselin Houenou;Stéphane Jamain

  • History of illness prior to a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder

    M. Berk;S. Dodd;P. Callaly;L. Berk

  • Vitamin D deficiency may play a role in depression

    Michael Berk;Kerrie M. Sanders;Julie A. Pasco;Felice N. Jacka

  • Glutathione: a novel treatment target in psychiatry.

    Michael Berk;Michael Berk;Felicity Ng;Olivia Dean;Seetal Dodd

  • Does stage of illness impact treatment response in bipolar disorder? Empirical treatment data and their implication for the staging model and early intervention.

    Michael Berk;Alan Brnabic;Seetal Dodd;Seetal Dodd;Katarina Kelin

  • C-reactive protein concentrations across the mood spectrum in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Brisa S Fernandes;Brisa S Fernandes;Johann Steiner;Marc L Molendijk;Seetal Dodd

  • The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine as an adjunctive treatment in bipolar depression: An open label trial ☆

    Michael Berk;Olivia Dean;Olivia Dean;Olivia Dean;Sue M. Cotton;Clarissa S. Gama

  • Staging in bipolar disorder: from theoretical framework to clinical utility

    Michael Berk;Robert Post;Aswin Ratheesh;Emma Gliddon

  • Immuno-inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and neuroprogressive pathways in the etiology, course and treatment of schizophrenia.

    George Anderson;Michael Berk;Michael Berk;Seetal Dodd;Karl Bechter

  • Stage managing bipolar disorder

    Michael Berk;Lesley Berk;Seetal Dodd;Seetal Dodd;Sue Cotton

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Berk
Michael Berk Deakin University
Olivia M. Dean
Olivia M. Dean Deakin University
Gin S Malhi
Gin S Malhi University of Sydney
Felice N. Jacka
Felice N. Jacka Deakin University
Julie A. Pasco
Julie A. Pasco Deakin University
Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Flávio Kapczinski
Flávio Kapczinski McMaster University
Michael Maes
Michael Maes University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Mark A. Kotowicz
Mark A. Kotowicz University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up multiple alternative pathways, especially through flexible online education options. Many students seeking entry into healthcare start with accessible nursing programs. For those considering a nursing degree, there are nursing schools with high acceptance rates, making it easier to begin your journey.

If cost is a concern, pursuing cheap rn to bsn programs can offer a practical and affordable route to advance your qualifications. These options allow working nurses to earn a bachelor's degree online without interrupting their careers.

Individuals wanting to switch careers to nursing, even without a prior nursing background, can look into direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online. These streamlined graduate programs combine essential training and can speed up your entry into advanced practice roles.

For experienced nurses aiming for leadership or academic roles, phd nursing programs are available online at competitive rates, helping you reach the highest levels in nursing research and education.

Best Scientists Citing Seetal Dodd

Trending Scientists