World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
38
Citations
11324
World Ranking
564
National Ranking
313

William P. Eveland publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William P. Eveland sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 85 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

William P. Eveland D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William P. Eveland sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

William P. Eveland is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology, political science, communication, and social psychology. Additional work touches on philosophy and artificial intelligence as subfields within their broader scope.

Their academic output includes publications in several peer-reviewed venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Political Communication
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Journal of Family Communication
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Eveland's research topics emphasize the intersections of social media and politics, social and intergroup psychology, and racial and ethnic identity research. Other notable areas include communication in education and healthcare, cultural differences and values, rhetoric and communication studies, as well as social capital and networks.

Their recent papers illustrate a consistent focus on communication dynamics, political conversations, and racial topics. Key papers include:

  • "Listening During Political Conversations: Traits and Situations," 2020, Political Communication
  • "Why we can't talk openly about race: The impact of race and partisanship on respondents' perceptions of intergroup conversations," 2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Contexts for Family Talk about Racism: Historical, Dyadic, and Geographic," 2020, Journal of Family Communication
  • "The implications of listening during political conversations for democracy," 2023, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "Listening and being listened to as affection exchange in marital discussions about the #MeToo movement," 2021, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Their coauthor network includes frequent collaborations with other scholars in related fields. Prominent coauthors are:

  • Osei Appiah
  • Kathryn D. Coduto
  • Olivia M. Bullock
  • Christina M. Henry
  • Amy I. Nathanson

Eveland's work contributes to understanding communication processes, political discourse, and social identity within various contexts. Their interdisciplinary research integrates social psychology with communication studies, addressing complex societal issues including race, media influences, and interpersonal interactions.

Best Publications

  • Information and Expression in a Digital Age Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation

    Dhavan V. Shah;Jaeho Cho;William P. Eveland;Nojin Kwak

  • Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation

    William P. Eveland;Dietram A. Scheufele

  • Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation

    William P Eveland;Myiah Hutchens Hively

  • The Cognitive Mediation Model of Learning From the News

    Unknown

  • Community Integration, Local Media Use, and Democratic Processes:

    Jack M. Mcleod;Katie Daily;Zhongshi Guo;William P. Eveland

  • Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics An Analysis of the Third-Person Effect

    Douglas M. McLEOD;William P. Eveland;Amy I. Nathanson

  • Assessing Causality in the Cognitive Mediation Model A Panel Study of Motivations, Information Processing, and Learning During Campaign 2000

    William P. Eveland;Dhavan V. Shah;Nojin Kwak

  • The Impact of Individual and Interpersonal Factors on Perceived News Media Bias

    William P. Eveland;Dhavan V. Shah

  • A “Mix of Attributes” Approach to the Study of Media Effects and New Communication Technologies

    William P. Eveland

  • Understanding the Relationship Between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data

    William P. Eveland;Andrew F. Hayes;Dhavan V. Shah;Nojin Kwak

  • Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary Perceived Likelihood of Expsoure and the Third-Person Perception

    William P. Eveland;Amy I. Nathanson;Benjamin H. Detenber;Douglas M. McLEOD

  • User Control and Structural Isomorphism or Disorientation and Cognitive Load

    William P. Eveland;Sharon Dunwoody

  • An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning From the Web Versus Print

    William P. Eveland;Sharon Dunwoody

  • Moving beyond “Just the Facts” The Influence of Online News on the Content and Structure of Public Affairs Knowledge

    William P. Eveland;Krisztina Marton;Mihye Seo

  • Examining Information Processing on the World Wide Web Using Think Aloud Protocols

    William P. Eveland;Sharon Dunwoody

  • Behind the Third-Person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other

    Douglas M. McLeod;Benjamin H. Detenber;William P. Eveland

  • News Information Processing as Mediator of the Relationship between Motivations and Political Knowledge

    William P. Eveland

  • Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective

    William P. Eveland;Alyssa C. Morey;Myiah J. Hutchens

  • Is It Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge

    William P. Eveland;Tiffany Thomson

  • THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY ON PERCEIVED MEDIA IMPACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THIRD-PERSON PERCEPTIONS

    William P. Eveland;Douglas M. McLeod

  • How Web Site Organization Influences Free Recall, Factual Knowledge, and Knowledge Structure Density

    William P. Eveland;Juliann Cortese;Heesun Park Park;Sharon Dunwoody

  • Learning From the News in Campaign 2000: An Experimental Comparison of TV News, Newspapers, and Online News

    William P. Eveland;Mihye Seo;Krisztina Marton

  • The “Who” Matters: Types of Interpersonal Relationships and Avoidance of Political Disagreement

    Alyssa C. Morey;William P. Eveland;Myiah J. Hutchens

  • Perceptions of 'public opinion' and 'public' opinion expression

    Dietram A. Scheufele;William P. Eveland

  • Education, Need for Cognition, and Campaign Interest as Moderators of News Effects on Political Knowledge: An Analysis of the Knowledge Gap

    Yung-I Liu;William P. Eveland

  • Contextual Antecedents and Political Consequences of Adolescent Political Discussion, Discussion Elaboration, and Network Diversity

    Myiah Hutchens Hively;William P. Eveland

  • Exposure, Attention, or “Use” of News? Assessing Aspects of the Reliability and Validity of a Central Concept in Political Communication Research

    William P. Eveland;Myiah J. Hutchens;Fei Shen

  • Interactions and Nonlinearity in Mass Communication: Connecting Theory and Methodology:

    William P. Eveland

  • Users and navigation patterns of a science World Wide Web site for the public

    William P. Eveland;Sharon Dunwoody

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon Dunwoody
Sharon Dunwoody University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dhavan V. Shah
Dhavan V. Shah University of Wisconsin–Madison
Amy I. Nathanson
Amy I. Nathanson The Ohio State University
Andrew F. Hayes
Andrew F. Hayes University of Calgary
Paul Allen Beck
Paul Allen Beck The Ohio State University
Dietram A. Scheufele
Dietram A. Scheufele University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jörg Matthes
Jörg Matthes University of Vienna
Nancy Signorielli
Nancy Signorielli University of Delaware
Jack M. McLeod
Jack M. McLeod University of Wisconsin–Madison
Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and flexible career options. Many students interested in government, policy, or law also consider a history degree for its strong foundation in research and analysis. An undergraduate or graduate degree in history can enhance your understanding of political systems, events, and ideologies.

Those seeking a broader educational experience may explore an online master interdisciplinary studies program. These flexible degrees allow you to tailor your coursework to personal interests, combining political science with complementary fields like sociology, economics, or communication.

If you plan to teach or pursue advanced research roles, a masters in history provides an affordable pathway to deepen your expertise and career opportunities.

In addition to traditional degrees, there are also easy certifications to get that pay well. These can help boost your credentials quickly and may lead to roles in project management, public relations, or analysis—fields that value critical thinking and communication skills developed through political science studies.

Best Scientists Citing William P. Eveland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles