World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
48
Citations
9840
World Ranking
280
National Ranking
160

Michael A. Xenos publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Xenos sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 17 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 127 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Michael A. Xenos D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Xenos sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 73 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Xenos is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science, communication, literature and literary theory, artificial intelligence, and political science and international relations. Across these fields, Xenos has contributed significantly to understanding the intersections of media, politics, and society.

Their scholarly work addresses multiple key research topics, including:

  • Social Media and Politics
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Media Studies and Communication
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Xenos has published numerous articles in respected academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • New Media & Society
  • Public Understanding of Science
  • PLoS ONE
  • Social Media + Society
  • Journal of Science Communication

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Whose AI? How different publics think about AI and its social impacts," 2022, published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "The science of YouTube: What factors influence user engagement with online science videos?" 2022, published in PLoS ONE
  • "Incidental news exposure via social media and political participation: Evidence of reciprocal effects," 2020, published in New Media & Society
  • "Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism," 2020, published in Public Understanding of Science
  • "Social media news deserts: Digital inequalities and incidental news exposure on social media platforms," 2021, published in New Media & Society

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Dietram A. Scheufele
  • Dominique Brossard
  • Emily L. Howell
  • Todd P. Newman
  • Shiyu Yang

Best Publications

  • The Nasty Effect: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies

    Ashley A. Anderson;Dominique Brossard;Dietram A. Scheufele;Michael A. Xenos

  • Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement

    Michael Xenos;Patricia Moy

  • The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies

    Michael Andrew Xenos;Ariadne Vromen;Brian Loader

  • The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement

    Brian Loader;Ariadne Vromen;Michael Andrew Xenos

  • Communication and Citizenship: Mapping the Political Effects of Infotainment

    Patricia Moy;Michael A. Xenos;Verena K. Hess

  • Media Framing and Effective Public Deliberation

    Adam Simon;Michael Xenos

  • Young people, social media and connective action: from organisational maintenance to everyday political talk

    Ariadne Vromen;Michael A. Xenos;Brian Loader

  • Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on Information Seeking and Political Learning

    Michael A. Xenos;Amy B. Becker

  • Priming Effects of Late-Night Comedy

    Patricia Moy;Michael A. Xenos;Verena K. Hess

  • Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments

    Xuan Liang;Leona Yi-Fan Su;Sara K. Yeo;Dietram A. Scheufele

  • Analyzing Linking Practices: Candidate Sites in the 2002 US Electoral Web Sphere

    Kirsten A. Foot;Steven M. Schneider;Meghan Dougherty;Michael Xenos

  • Of Attitudes and Engagement: Clarifying the Reciprocal Relationship Between Civic Attitudes and Political Participation

    John Gastil;Michael Andrew Xenos

  • Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media:

    Michael A. Cacciatore;Ashley A. Anderson;Doo-Hun Choi;Dominique Brossard

  • Toxic Talk: How Online Incivility Can Undermine Perceptions of Media

    Ashley A Anderson;Sara K Yeo;Dominique Brossard;Dietram A Scheufele

  • U.S. attitudes on human genome editing

    Dietram A. Scheufele;Dietram A. Scheufele;Michael A. Xenos;Emily L. Howell;Kathleen M. Rose

  • Politics As Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. Elections

    Michael A. Xenos;Kirsten A. Foot

  • Uncivil and personal? Comparing patterns of incivility in comments on the Facebook pages of news outlets:

    Leona Yi-Fan Su;Leona Yi-Fan Su;Michael A Xenos;Kathleen M Rose;Christopher Wirz

  • Effects of Campaign‐to‐User and Text‐Based Interactivity in Political Candidate Campaign Web sites

    Barbara Warnick;Michael Xenos;Danielle Endres;John Gastil

  • New Mediated Deliberation: Blog and Press Coverage of the Alito Nomination

    Michael Xenos

  • Analyzing public sentiments online: combining human- and computer-based content analysis

    Leona Yi-Fan Su;Michael A. Cacciatore;Xuan Liang;Dominique Brossard

  • Social distraction? Social media use and political knowledge in two U.S. Presidential elections

    Sangwon Lee;Michael Xenos

  • Performing for the young networked citizen? Celebrity politics, social networking and the political engagement of young people:

    Brian D Loader;Ariadne Vromen;Michael A Xenos

  • Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected

    Michael A. Xenos

Frequent Co-Authors

Dominique Brossard
Dominique Brossard University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dietram A. Scheufele
Dietram A. Scheufele University of Wisconsin–Madison
John Gastil
John Gastil Pennsylvania State University
Shanto Iyengar
Shanto Iyengar Stanford University
W. Lance Bennett
W. Lance Bennett University of Washington
Paul F. Nealey
Paul F. Nealey University of Chicago
Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Kathleen Hall Jamieson University of Pennsylvania
David Domke
David Domke University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens the door to a versatile range of online degrees and potential career paths. Many students interested in public policy, government, or advocacy also consider related fields such as environmental science. Exploring high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds can offer insight into how political decisions impact ecological matters.

For those drawn to analytical and problem-solving roles, careers in mathematics are closely aligned with data-driven governance and policy analysis. Reviewing options in applied mathematics jobs can help you see how numbers influence political decisions and drive innovation in public service roles.

Library science is another exciting, related field. Today’s top top library science programs equip graduates with the skills needed for research, information management, and archival work—critical assets in governmental, legal, and nonprofit sectors.

Finally, the study of history is essential for anyone interested in understanding political systems and societal change. Find out more about how to get a degree in history and how this academic path complements your studies in political science.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Xenos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles