World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew F. Hayes

Andrew F. Hayes

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1388 1238 77 70 101 196224

Andrew F. Hayes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew F. Hayes between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew F. Hayes published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2009. 2 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2009. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew F. Hayes: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 0
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 0
2004 3
2005 5
2006 5
2007 9
2008 8
2009 15
2010 5
2011 2
2012 4
2013 8
2014 6
2015 3
2016 0
2017 7
2018 1
2019 2
2020 12
2021 1
2022 2
2023 2
2024 0
2025 2
Total 123
Download as CSV

Andrew F. Hayes publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew F. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 101 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 101
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew F. Hayes D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew F. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew F. Hayes is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Social Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Power and Status Dynamics

Their recent papers reflect a focus on methodological and applied psychological research. Notable publications include:

  • Use Omega Rather than Cronbach's Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But..., 2020, Communication Methods and Measures
  • Combatting Terrorism and Extremism in Wales: Operational Policing, 2021, The Journal of Intelligence Conflict and Warfare

Additional recent influential research within the broader scope of their academic environment includes:

  • Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: Concepts, Computations, and Some Common Confusions, 2021, The Spanish Journal of Psychology
  • Questions of value, questions of magnitude: An exploration and application of methods for comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, 2022, Behavior Research Methods
  • Factors affecting the association between maternal adverse childhood experiences and preschool children's behavioural problems: a systematic review of mediators and moderators, 2023, Clinical Medicine Insights Psychiatry

Andrew F. Hayes frequently collaborates with several coauthors in their research endeavors. These collaborators include:

  • Jacob J. Coutts
  • Stefan Kurbatfinski
  • Nicole Letourneau
  • Deborah Dewey
  • Aliyah Dosani

Publications by Andrew F. Hayes tend to appear in journals such as:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Communication Methods and Measures
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology
  • Clinical Medicine Insights Psychiatry
  • The Journal of Intelligence Conflict and Warfare

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach

    Andrew F. Hayes

  • Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Andrew F. Hayes

  • SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Andrew F. Hayes

  • Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium

    Andrew F. Hayes

  • Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Derek D. Rucker;Andrew F. Hayes

  • Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data

    Andrew F. Hayes;Klaus Krippendorff

  • Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable

    Andrew F. Hayes;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation.

    Andrew F. Hayes

  • Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation

    Andrew F. Hayes

  • Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations.

    Andrew F. Hayes;Jörg Matthes

  • The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis Does Method Really Matter

    Andrew F. Hayes;Michael Scharkow

  • Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation.

    Andrew F. Hayes;Nicholas J. Rockwood

  • Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…

    Andrew F. Hayes;Jacob J. Coutts

  • Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: an introduction and software implementation.

    Andrew F. Hayes;Li Cai

  • Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research.

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Andrew F. Hayes

  • The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling

    Andrew F. Hayes;Amanda K. Montoya;Nicholas J. Rockwood

  • Quantifying and Testing Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models When the Constituent Paths Are Nonlinear

    Andrew F. Hayes;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • Two-Condition Within-Participant Statistical Mediation Analysis: A Path-Analytic Framework.

    Amanda K Montoya;Andrew F Hayes

  • A Primer on Multilevel Modeling

    Andrew F. Hayes

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Slater
Michael D. Slater The Ohio State University
Kristopher J. Preacher
Kristopher J. Preacher Vanderbilt University
Jörg Matthes
Jörg Matthes University of Vienna
William P. Eveland
William P. Eveland The Ohio State University
Harvey J. Irwin
Harvey J. Irwin Macquarie University
James Shanahan
James Shanahan Indiana University
Dhavan V. Shah
Dhavan V. Shah University of Wisconsin–Madison
Hernando Rojas
Hernando Rojas University of Wisconsin–Madison
David Dunning
David Dunning University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lilian Lechner
Lilian Lechner The Open University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students now choose flexible online programs to fast-track education and career growth. For those seeking advanced credentials in less time, 1 year graduate programs enable quick upskilling and faster entry or progression in the workforce.

If you are looking to earn your undergraduate degree faster, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online offer an intensive curriculum that can help reduce both the time and cost of education. These programs are ideal for motivated students ready to balance a challenging workload with flexible scheduling.

Specialized pathways in social work and behavioral analysis are also in high demand. Social work aspirants can benefit from online msw programs, which provide affordable, accessible training for impactful community roles. Those interested in applied behavior analysis can explore bcba online masters programs to qualify for rewarding positions supporting individuals with behavioral needs.

These online pathways are not only convenient but can significantly boost career prospects in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew F. Hayes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles