World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 49 14852 13378 327 310 121 8344

Ekaterina I. Izgorodina publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ekaterina I. Izgorodina between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ekaterina I. Izgorodina published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2006. 1 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2006. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ekaterina I. Izgorodina: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 12
2007 6
2008 8
2009 6
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 5
2014 4
2015 4
2016 4
2017 8
2018 10
2019 6
2020 6
2021 7
2022 7
2023 10
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 128
Download as CSV

Ekaterina I. Izgorodina publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ekaterina I. Izgorodina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 121 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918 121
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ekaterina I. Izgorodina D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ekaterina I. Izgorodina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 49
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ekaterina I. Izgorodina is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on materials science and chemistry.

The main fields of study for Ekaterina I. Izgorodina include:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemistry

Their subfields of study highlight a focus on:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Catalysis
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Their research covers diverse topics such as:

  • Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies

Ekaterina I. Izgorodina has published in several scientific journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society

Representative recent publications include:

  • Reversible Reduction of the TEMPO Radical: One Step Closer to an All-Organic Redox Flow Battery, 2020, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • A Systematic Study of DFT Performance for Geometry Optimizations of Ionic Liquid Clusters, 2020, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • Ordered Solvents and Ionic Liquids Can Be Harnessed for Electrostatic Catalysis, 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Experimental Evidence of Long-Lived Electric Fields of Ionic Liquid Bilayers, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The effect of descriptor choice in machine learning models for ionic liquid melting point prediction, 2020, The Journal of Chemical Physics

The researcher has collaborated repeatedly with several co-authors, including:

  • Thomas G. Mason
  • Michelle L. Coote
  • Benny D. Freeman
  • Zoe L. Seeger
  • Kaycee Low

Best Publications

  • On the concept of ionicity in ionic liquids

    Douglas R. MacFarlane;Maria Forsyth;Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Andrew P. Abbott

  • Ionic Liquids in Electrochemical Devices and Processes: Managing Interfacial Electrochemistry

    Douglas Robert Macfarlane;Maria Forsyth;Patrick Craig Howlett;Jennifer Mary Pringle

  • Electrochemistry at Negative Potentials in Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide Ionic Liquids

    Patrick Craig Howlett;Ekaterina Izgorodina;Maria Forsyth;Douglas Robert Macfarlane

  • Ionicity and proton transfer in protic ionic liquids

    Jelena Stoimenovski;Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Douglas R. MacFarlane

  • Trends in R-X bond dissociation energies (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu; X = H, CH3, OCH3, OH, F): a surprising shortcoming of density functional theory.

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Michelle L. Coote;Leo Radom

  • Quantum Chemical Methods for the Prediction of Energetic, Physical, and Spectroscopic Properties of Ionic Liquids.

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Zoe L. Seeger;David L. A. Scarborough;Samuel Y. S. Tan

  • Liquids intermediate between "molecular" and "ionic" liquids: liquid ion pairs?

    Kevin James Fraser;Ekaterina Izgorodina;Maria Forsyth;Janet Scott

  • Low overpotential water oxidation to hydrogen peroxide on a MnOx catalyst

    Alex Izgorodin;Ekaterina Izgorodina;Douglas R. MacFarlane

  • On the components of the dielectric constants of ionic liquids: ionic polarization?

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Maria Forsyth;Douglas R. MacFarlane

  • Should contemporary density functional theory methods be used to study the thermodynamics of radical reactions

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;David R. B. Brittain;Jennifer L. Hodgson;Elizabeth H. Krenske

  • Ion-Pair Binding Energies of Ionic Liquids: Can DFT Compete with Ab Initio-Based Methods?

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Uditha L. Bernard;Douglas R. MacFarlane

  • Protic ionic liquids based on the dimeric and oligomeric anions: [(AcO)xHx−1]−

    Katarina Maria Johansson;Ekaterina Izgorodina;Maria Forsyth;Douglas Robert Macfarlane

  • Nature of hydrogen bonding in charged hydrogen-bonded complexes and imidazolium-based ionic liquids.

    Ekaterina Ivanovna Izgorodina;Douglas Macfarlane

  • Accurate ab initio prediction of propagation rate coefficients in free-radical polymerization: Acrylonitrile and vinyl chloride

    Ekaterina Izgorodina;M L Coote

  • Protic pharmaceutical ionic liquids and solids: aspects of protonics

    Jelena Stoimenovski;Pamela M. Dean;Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Douglas R. MacFarlane

  • Computational studies of RAFT polymerization-mechanistic insights and practical applications

    Michelle L. Coote;Elizabeth H. Krenske;Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

  • Towards large-scale, fully ab initio calculations of ionic liquids.

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

  • Calculation of 0-0 excitation energies of organic molecules by CIS(D) quantum chemical methods

    Stefan Grimme;Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

  • Assessment of Kohn–Sham density functional theory and Møller–Plesset perturbation theory for ionic liquids

    Stefan Zahn;Douglas R. MacFarlane;Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

  • Importance of dispersion forces for prediction of thermodynamic and transport properties of some common ionic liquids

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Dorothea Golze;Radha Maganti;Vanessa Armel

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas R. MacFarlane
Douglas R. MacFarlane Monash University
Michelle L. Coote
Michelle L. Coote Flinders University
Maria Forsyth
Maria Forsyth Deakin University
Bayden R. Wood
Bayden R. Wood Monash University
Glen B. Deacon
Glen B. Deacon Monash University
Christopher Barner-Kowollik
Christopher Barner-Kowollik Queensland University of Technology
Stuart Robert Batten
Stuart Robert Batten Monash University
Jennifer M. Pringle
Jennifer M. Pringle Deakin University
Philippe Poizot
Philippe Poizot University of Nantes
Dermot Diamond
Dermot Diamond Dublin City University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that blend science with practical application. Many chemistry graduates pursue roles in pharmaceuticals, healthcare, and forensic science, which require specialized education and training.

For those interested in legal support within scientific fields, understanding what types of paralegals make the most money can help tailor education choices toward lucrative paralegal degrees that align with a chemistry background.

Career options also include becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative. Knowing the pharmaceutical rep salary and the required skills can guide chemistry students toward roles that combine scientific knowledge with business acumen.

For those aiming at healthcare professions, the path to how to become a pharmacist salary offers valuable insight into the required degrees, certifications, and earning potential in this vital role.

Another specialized career is forensic science, where chemistry graduates can explore becoming an autopsy technician. Understanding the autopsy technician salary and job outlook helps assess the educational commitment and career benefits in this field.

By exploring these related degrees and career pathways, chemistry students can make informed decisions to maximize their education and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Ekaterina I. Izgorodina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles