World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michelle L. Coote

Michelle L. Coote

Award Badge
Chemistry
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
78
Citations
21292
World Ranking
3811
National Ranking
97

Michelle L. Coote publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle L. Coote sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 377 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Michelle L. Coote D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle L. Coote sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award
  • 2017 - Australian Laureate Fellow

Overview

Michelle L. Coote is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields and subfields with a focus on materials science and chemistry. Within these domains, they have contributed extensively in areas such as materials chemistry, organic chemistry, molecular biology, renewable energy and sustainability, as well as physical and theoretical chemistry.

The researcher's work touches on several key scientific topics, including crystallization and solubility studies, X-ray diffraction in crystallography, advanced polymer synthesis and characterization, radical photochemical reactions, CO2 reduction techniques and catalysts, electrochemical analysis and applications, and crystallography and molecular interactions.

Michelle L. Coote has authored publications in various significant venues. Notable among these are:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Angewandte Chemie

Some recent papers authored include:

  • "Reversing RAFT Polymerization: Near-Quantitative Monomer Generation Via a Catalyst-Free Depolymerization Approach," 2022, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "The corona of a surface bubble promotes electrochemical reactions," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "High Electric Fields on Water Microdroplets Catalyze Spontaneous and Fast Reactions in Halogen-Bond Complexes," 2023, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Recent advances in the chemistry of benzoe[1,2,4]triazinyl radicals," 2020, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
  • "Diradical Generation via Relayed Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer," 2022, Journal of the American Chemical Society

The researcher frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Li-Juan Yu
  • Martin G. Banwell
  • Le Nhan Pham
  • Annie L. Colebatch
  • Michael G. Gardiner

Michelle L. Coote received the Australian Laureate Fellow award in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Electrostatic catalysis of a Diels–Alder reaction

    Albert C. Aragonès;Naomi L. Haworth;Nadim Darwish;Simone Ciampi

  • Understanding atom transfer radical polymerization: effect of ligand and initiator structures on the equilibrium constants.

    Wei Tang;Yungwan Kwak;Wade Braunecker;Nicolay V. Tsarevsky

  • Comment on the correct use of continuum solvent models.

    Junming Ho;Andreas Klamt;Michelle L. Coote

  • Deep Learning in Chemistry.

    Adam C. Mater;Michelle L. Coote

  • Mechanism and kinetics of dithiobenzoate-mediated RAFT polymerization. I. The current situation

    Christopher Barner-Kowollik;Michael Buback;Bernadette Charleux;Michelle L. Coote

  • Computational electrochemistry: prediction of liquid-phase reduction potentials

    Aleksandr V. Marenich;Junming Ho;Michelle L. Coote;Christopher J. Cramer

  • A universal approach for continuum solvent pK a calculations: are we there yet?

    Junming Ho;Michelle L. Coote

  • Molecular dynamics-driven drug discovery: leaping forward with confidence.

    Aravindhan Ganesan;Michelle L. Coote;Khaled Barakat

  • Adaptable Hetero Diels-Alder Networks for Fast Self-Healing under Mild Conditions

    Kim K. Oehlenschlaeger;Jan O. Mueller;Josef Brandt;Stefan Hilf

  • Ab initio evaluation of the thermodynamic and electrochemical properties of alkyl halides and radicals and their mechanistic implications for atom transfer radical polymerization.

    Ching Yeh Lin;Michelle L. Coote;Armando Gennaro;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Harnessing electrostatic catalysis in single molecule, electrochemical and chemical systems: a rapidly growing experimental tool box

    Simone Ciampi;Nadim Darwish;Heather M. Aitken;Ismael Díez-Pérez

  • Trends in R-X bond dissociation energies (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu; X = H, CH3, OCH3, OH, F): a surprising shortcoming of density functional theory.

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;Michelle L. Coote;Leo Radom

  • Estimation of standard reduction potentials of halogen atoms and alkyl halides.

    Abdirisak A. Isse;Ching Yeh Lin;Michelle L. Coote;Armando Gennaro

  • Benchmark Calculations of Absolute Reduction Potential of Ferricinium/Ferrocene Couple in Nonaqueous Solutions.

    Mansoor Namazian;Ching Yeh Lin;Michelle L. Coote

  • Revising the mechanism of polymer autooxidation

    Ganna Gryn'ova;Jennifer L. Hodgson;Michelle L. Coote

  • Capturing snapshots of post-synthetic metallation chemistry in metal–organic frameworks

    Witold M. Bloch;Alexandre Burgun;Campbell J. Coghlan;Richmond Lee

  • The mechanism of the propagation step in free-radical copolymerisation

    M.L. Coote;T.P. Davis

  • Should contemporary density functional theory methods be used to study the thermodynamics of radical reactions

    Ekaterina I. Izgorodina;David R. B. Brittain;Jennifer L. Hodgson;Elizabeth H. Krenske

  • The reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer process and the strength and limitations of modeling: Comment on “the magnitude of the fragmentation rate coefficient”

    Christopher Barner-Kowollik;Michelle L. Coote;Thomas P. Davis;Leo Radom

  • Consistent experimental and theoretical evidence for long-lived intermediate radicals in living free radical polymerization

    Achim Feldermann;Michelle L. Coote;Martina H. Stenzel;Thomas P. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Barner-Kowollik
Christopher Barner-Kowollik Queensland University of Technology
Thomas P. Davis
Thomas P. Davis University of Queensland
Leo Radom
Leo Radom University of Sydney
Ekaterina I. Izgorodina
Ekaterina I. Izgorodina Monash University
Martina H. Stenzel
Martina H. Stenzel University of New South Wales
Anthony C. Willis
Anthony C. Willis Australian National University
Stephen J. Blanksby
Stephen J. Blanksby Queensland University of Technology
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski Carnegie Mellon University
Martin G. Banwell
Martin G. Banwell Australian National University
Gordon G. Wallace
Gordon G. Wallace University of Wollongong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens diverse career opportunities across healthcare, research, and industry sectors. Many students explore specialized paths such as becoming a pharmacist, where understanding is it hard to become a pharmacist helps set realistic expectations for the extensive education and training required.

For those interested in the pharmaceutical industry without patient-facing roles, a career as a pharmaceutical sales rep provides a lucrative alternative. Discovering the pharmaceutical sales rep salary and understanding career paths can guide students toward effective networking and skill development strategies.

Additionally, careers like autopsy technician offer unique opportunities to apply chemistry and biology knowledge in forensic settings. Learning about the educational requirements, compensation, and job outlook through resources on autopsy tech roles can help students decide if this niche is a good fit.

Moreover, for those considering legal aspects within scientific fields, exploring different types of paralegal degrees and their potential earnings is valuable. Understanding what types of paralegals make the most money can help chemistry graduates leverage their analytical skills in legal assistance roles.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle L. Coote

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles