World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
11604
World Ranking
14999
National Ranking
6275

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 304 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily within the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans a variety of subfields, including genetics, molecular biology, radiology, cancer research, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their primary research interests focus on topics such as glioma diagnosis and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, cancer genomics and diagnostics, epigenetics and DNA methylation, renal cell carcinoma treatment, DNA repair mechanisms, and microRNA in disease regulation.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow include:

  • Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, 2020, published in JAMA Oncology
  • Generative Adversarial Networks to Synthesize Missing T1 and FLAIR MRI Sequences for Use in a Multisequence Brain Tumor Segmentation Model, 2021, published in Radiology
  • Heterogeneous delivery across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of an EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugate in glioblastoma, 2021, published in Neuro-Oncology
  • A noncoding single-nucleotide polymorphism at 8q24 drives IDH1-mutant glioma formation, 2022, published in Science
  • Effects of Heterozygous Variants in the Leptin-Melanocortin Pathway on Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Outcomes: a 15-Year Case-Control Study, 2022, published in Obesity Surgery

Jeanette collaborates frequently with several researchers, indicating a strong network in their research community. Key collaborators include:

  • Paul A. Decker
  • Robert B. Jenkins
  • Daniel H. Lachance
  • Matthew Kosel
  • Danielle M. Burgenske

Their publications are often found in notable scientific venues such as:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors

    Jeanette E Eckel-Passow;Daniel H Lachance;Annette M. Molinaro;Kyle M. Walsh

  • Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

    Annette M. Molinaro;Shawn Hervey-Jumper;Ramin A. Morshed;Jacob Young

  • A locus on 19p13 modifies risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and is associated with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in the general population

    Antonis C. Antoniou;Xianshu Wang;Zachary S. Fredericksen;Lesley McGuffog

  • Genome-wide association study of glioma subtypes identifies specific differences in genetic susceptibility to glioblastoma and non-glioblastoma tumors

    Beatrice S Melin;Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan;Margaret R Wrensch;Christoffer Johansen

  • Adult infiltrating gliomas with WHO 2016 integrated diagnosis: additional prognostic roles of ATRX and TERT.

    Melike Pekmezci;Terri Rice;Annette M. Molinaro;Kyle M. Walsh

  • Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA.

    Ann L. Oberg;Douglas W. Mahoney;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow;Christopher J. Malone

  • Measure transcript integrity using RNA-seq data

    Liguo Wang;Jinfu Nie;Hugues Sicotte;Ying Li

  • Genomic Analysis Reveals That Immune Function Genes Are Strongly Linked to Clinical Outcome in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Adjuvant Trastuzumab Trial

    Edith A. Perez;E. Aubrey Thompson;Karla V. Ballman;S. Keith Anderson

  • Variants near TERT and TERC influencing telomere length are associated with high-grade glioma risk

    Kyle M Walsh;Veryan Codd;Ivan V Smirnov;Terri Rice

  • The Mayo Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk Score: Implication for Surgical Site Infection Reporting and Risk Stratification

    Elie F. Berbari;Douglas R. Osmon;Brian Lahr;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 25 known breast cancer susceptibility loci as risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer

    Kristen S. Purrington;Susan Slager;Diana Eccles;Drakoulis Yannoukakos

  • LEF-1 is a prosurvival factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is expressed in the preleukemic state of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis

    Albert Gutierrez;Renee C. Tschumper;Xiaosheng Wu;Tait D. Shanafelt

  • Integrated analysis of gene expression, CpG island methylation, and gene copy number in breast cancer cells by deep sequencing.

    Zhifu Sun;Yan W. Asmann;Krishna R. Kalari;Brian Bot

  • A low-frequency variant at 8q24.21 is strongly associated with risk of oligodendroglial tumors and astrocytomas with IDH1 or IDH2 mutation

    Robert B Jenkins;Yuanyuan Xiao;Hugues Sicotte;Paul A Decker

  • Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a broad panel of patient-derived xenografts reflects the diversity of glioblastoma

    Rachael A Vaubel;Shulan Tian;Dioval Remonde;Mark A. Schroeder

  • Loss of BAP1 protein expression is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with low-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

    Richard W. Joseph;Payal Kapur;Daniel J. Serie;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

  • Antimicrobial resistance trends of Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates: a population-based study, 1998–2007

    Majdi N. Al-Hasan;Brian D. Lahr;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow;Larry M. Baddour

  • Development and evaluation of BioScore: a biomarker panel to enhance prognostic algorithms for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

    Alexander S. Parker;Bradley C. Leibovich;Christine M. Lohse;Yuri Sheinin

  • A new statistic for identifying batch effects in high-throughput genomic data that uses guided principal component analysis

    Sarah E. Reese;Kellie J. Archer;Terry M. Therneau;Elizabeth J. Atkinson

  • Incidence Rate and Outcome of Gram‐Negative Bloodstream Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

    M. N. Al-Hasan;M. N. Al-Hasan;R. R. Razonable;J. E. Eckel-Passow;L. M. Baddour

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret R. Wrensch
Margaret R. Wrensch University of California, San Francisco
John K. Wiencke
John K. Wiencke University of California, San Francisco
John C. Cheville
John C. Cheville Mayo Clinic
Melissa L. Bondy
Melissa L. Bondy Stanford University
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan Case Western Reserve University
Richard S. Houlston
Richard S. Houlston Institute of Cancer Research
Joseph L. Wiemels
Joseph L. Wiemels University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a range of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and management. Many students expand their options by considering accelerated healthcare management degree online programs, which allow for quick entry into leadership roles within hospitals or clinics.

For those interested in mental health, enrolling in psych np programs online can be a flexible path to becoming a certified psychiatric nurse practitioner. This is an excellent option for biology or biochemistry graduates who wish to work directly with patients.

Nutrition is another popular pathway. Those looking for quicker qualification can explore a fastest nutrition degree online option, ideal for starting a career in nutritional science or dietetics.

Finally, if you're considering a future in healthcare leadership, an affordable online mba in healthcare management can provide vital business skills to complement your science background.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles