World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 55 14993 13771 6272 5612 304 11604

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 19.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 73 publications in 2023. 96 of the 409 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 73. Peak 73 publications in 2023. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 73 publications 2024: 58 publications 2025: 38 publications
2005 2025

409 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 4
2009 11
2010 14
2011 9
2012 8
2013 24
2014 17
2015 24
2016 27
2017 21
2018 24
2019 13
2020 11
2021 20
2022 10
2023 73
2024 58
2025 38
Total 409
Download as CSV

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 297–306 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 304 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363 304
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149 55
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily within the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans a variety of subfields, including genetics, molecular biology, radiology, cancer research, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their primary research interests focus on topics such as glioma diagnosis and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, cancer genomics and diagnostics, epigenetics and DNA methylation, renal cell carcinoma treatment, DNA repair mechanisms, and microRNA in disease regulation.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow include:

  • Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, 2020, published in JAMA Oncology
  • Generative Adversarial Networks to Synthesize Missing T1 and FLAIR MRI Sequences for Use in a Multisequence Brain Tumor Segmentation Model, 2021, published in Radiology
  • Heterogeneous delivery across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of an EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugate in glioblastoma, 2021, published in Neuro-Oncology
  • A noncoding single-nucleotide polymorphism at 8q24 drives IDH1-mutant glioma formation, 2022, published in Science
  • Effects of Heterozygous Variants in the Leptin-Melanocortin Pathway on Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Outcomes: a 15-Year Case-Control Study, 2022, published in Obesity Surgery

Jeanette collaborates frequently with several researchers, indicating a strong network in their research community. Key collaborators include:

  • Paul A. Decker
  • Robert B. Jenkins
  • Daniel H. Lachance
  • Matthew Kosel
  • Danielle M. Burgenske

Their publications are often found in notable scientific venues such as:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors

    Jeanette E Eckel-Passow;Daniel H Lachance;Annette M. Molinaro;Kyle M. Walsh

  • A locus on 19p13 modifies risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and is associated with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in the general population

    Antonis C. Antoniou;Xianshu Wang;Zachary S. Fredericksen;Lesley McGuffog

  • Genome-wide association study of glioma subtypes identifies specific differences in genetic susceptibility to glioblastoma and non-glioblastoma tumors

    Beatrice S Melin;Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan;Margaret R Wrensch;Christoffer Johansen

  • Adult infiltrating gliomas with WHO 2016 integrated diagnosis: additional prognostic roles of ATRX and TERT.

    Melike Pekmezci;Terri Rice;Annette M. Molinaro;Kyle M. Walsh

  • Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA.

    Ann L. Oberg;Douglas W. Mahoney;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow;Christopher J. Malone

  • Measure transcript integrity using RNA-seq data

    Liguo Wang;Jinfu Nie;Hugues Sicotte;Ying Li

  • Genomic Analysis Reveals That Immune Function Genes Are Strongly Linked to Clinical Outcome in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Adjuvant Trastuzumab Trial

    Edith A. Perez;E. Aubrey Thompson;Karla V. Ballman;S. Keith Anderson

  • Variants near TERT and TERC influencing telomere length are associated with high-grade glioma risk

    Kyle M Walsh;Veryan Codd;Ivan V Smirnov;Terri Rice

  • The Mayo Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk Score: Implication for Surgical Site Infection Reporting and Risk Stratification

    Elie F. Berbari;Douglas R. Osmon;Brian Lahr;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 25 known breast cancer susceptibility loci as risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer

    Kristen S. Purrington;Susan Slager;Diana Eccles;Drakoulis Yannoukakos

  • LEF-1 is a prosurvival factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is expressed in the preleukemic state of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis

    Albert Gutierrez;Renee C. Tschumper;Xiaosheng Wu;Tait D. Shanafelt

  • Integrated analysis of gene expression, CpG island methylation, and gene copy number in breast cancer cells by deep sequencing.

    Zhifu Sun;Yan W. Asmann;Krishna R. Kalari;Brian Bot

  • A low-frequency variant at 8q24.21 is strongly associated with risk of oligodendroglial tumors and astrocytomas with IDH1 or IDH2 mutation

    Robert B Jenkins;Yuanyuan Xiao;Hugues Sicotte;Paul A Decker

  • Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a broad panel of patient-derived xenografts reflects the diversity of glioblastoma

    Rachael A Vaubel;Shulan Tian;Dioval Remonde;Mark A. Schroeder

  • Loss of BAP1 protein expression is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with low-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

    Richard W. Joseph;Payal Kapur;Daniel J. Serie;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

  • Antimicrobial resistance trends of Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates: a population-based study, 1998–2007

    Majdi N. Al-Hasan;Brian D. Lahr;Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow;Larry M. Baddour

  • Development and evaluation of BioScore: a biomarker panel to enhance prognostic algorithms for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

    Alexander S. Parker;Bradley C. Leibovich;Christine M. Lohse;Yuri Sheinin

  • A new statistic for identifying batch effects in high-throughput genomic data that uses guided principal component analysis

    Sarah E. Reese;Kellie J. Archer;Terry M. Therneau;Elizabeth J. Atkinson

  • Incidence Rate and Outcome of Gram‐Negative Bloodstream Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

    M. N. Al-Hasan;M. N. Al-Hasan;R. R. Razonable;J. E. Eckel-Passow;L. M. Baddour

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret R. Wrensch
Margaret R. Wrensch University of California, San Francisco
John K. Wiencke
John K. Wiencke University of California, San Francisco
John C. Cheville
John C. Cheville Mayo Clinic
Melissa L. Bondy
Melissa L. Bondy Stanford University
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan Case Western Reserve University
Richard S. Houlston
Richard S. Houlston Institute of Cancer Research
Joseph L. Wiemels
Joseph L. Wiemels University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a range of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and management. Many students expand their options by considering accelerated healthcare management degree online programs, which allow for quick entry into leadership roles within hospitals or clinics.

For those interested in mental health, enrolling in psych np programs online can be a flexible path to becoming a certified psychiatric nurse practitioner. This is an excellent option for biology or biochemistry graduates who wish to work directly with patients.

Nutrition is another popular pathway. Those looking for quicker qualification can explore a fastest nutrition degree online option, ideal for starting a career in nutritional science or dietetics.

Finally, if you're considering a future in healthcare leadership, an affordable online mba in healthcare management can provide vital business skills to complement your science background.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles