World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
72
Citations
19531
World Ranking
1691
National Ranking
864

James J. Cimino publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Cimino sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 383 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

James J. Cimino D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Cimino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

James J. Cimino is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant portion of work dedicated to biomedical text mining and ontologies, electronic health records systems, and machine learning applications within healthcare.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, with main publications distributed across these domains. Subfields of study include genetics, health information management, molecular biology, artificial intelligence, and general health professions.

Frequent research topics addressed in Cimino's work include:

  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences Research and Education

Among the most frequented publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Applied Clinical Informatics
  • Yearbook of Medical Informatics

James J. Cimino has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including Robert L. Bradford, David A. Hanauer, Tiago K. Colicchio, Riccardo Bellazzi, and Douglas S. Bell, each contributing to a significant number of joint publications.

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Cimino include:

  • The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment (2020), published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Clinical Characterization and Prediction of Clinical Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Adults Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative (2021), published in JAMA Network Open
  • International electronic health record-derived COVID-19 clinical course profiles: the 4CE consortium (2020), published in npj Digital Medicine
  • Towards standardization of echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular function in adult rodents: a position paper of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial Function (2020), published in Cardiovascular Research
  • Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations (2022), published in Genome Medicine

James J. Cimino was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine

    Edward H. Shortliffe;James J. Edward H. Shortliffe. James J. Cimino Cimino

  • A General Natural-language Text Processor for Clinical Radiology

    Carol Friedman;Philip O. Alderson;John H. M. Austin;James J. Cimino

  • Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century

    James.J. Cimino

  • DXplain: An Evolving Diagnostic Decision-Support System

    G O Barnett;J J Cimino;J A Hupp;E P Hoffer

  • Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

    William R. Hersh;Mark G. Weiner;Peter J. Embi;Judith R. Logan

  • The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, Design, Infrastructure, and Deployment.

    Melissa A Haendel;Melissa A Haendel;Christopher G Chute;Tellen D Bennett;David A Eichmann

  • A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study

    Steven Shea;Ruth S. Weinstock;Ruth S. Weinstock;Jeanne A. Teresi;Jeanne A. Teresi;Walter Palmas

  • Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology.

    James J. Cimino;Paul D. Clayton;George Hripcsak;Stephen B. Johnson

  • Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces.

    André Kushniruk;Vimla L. Patel;James J. Cimino

  • AskHERMES: An online question answering system for complex clinical questions

    Yonggang Cao;Feifan Liu;Pippa Simpson;Lamont D. Antieau

  • Internet as Clinical Information System: Application Development Using the World Wide Web

    James J. Cimino;Socrates A. Socratous;Paul D. Clayton

  • The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records.

    James J Cimino;Vimla L Patel;Andre W Kushniruk

  • Toward a Medical-concept Representation Language

    David A. Evans;James J. Cimino;William R. Hersh;Stanley M. Huff

  • Designing an Introspective, Multipurpose, Controlled Medical Vocabulary.

    Cimino Jj;Hripcsak G;Johnson Sb;Clayton Pd

  • In defense of the desiderata

    James J. Cimino

  • International electronic health record-derived COVID-19 clinical course profiles: the 4CE consortium

    Gabriel A. Brat;Griffin M. Weber;Nils Gehlenborg;Paul Avillach

  • Perceived Information Needs and Communication Difficulties of Inpatient Physicians and Nurses

    Lawrence K. McKnight;Peter D. Stetson;Suzanne Bakken;Christine Curran

  • The practical impact of ontologies on biomedical informatics.

    J. J. Cimino;X. Zhu

  • From data to knowledge through concept-oriented terminologies: experience with the Medical Entities Dictionary.

    James J. Cimino

  • Auditing the Unified Medical Language System with Semantic Methods

    James J. Cimino

Frequent Co-Authors

Vimla L. Patel
Vimla L. Patel Columbia University
Suzanne Bakken
Suzanne Bakken Columbia University
Stephen B. Johnson
Stephen B. Johnson Columbia University
George Hripcsak
George Hripcsak Columbia University
Yehoshua Perl
Yehoshua Perl New Jersey Institute of Technology
Andre Kushniruk
Andre Kushniruk University of Victoria
Carol Friedman
Carol Friedman Columbia University
Chunhua Weng
Chunhua Weng Columbia University
G. Octo Barnett
G. Octo Barnett Massachusetts General Hospital
Stanley M. Huff
Stanley M. Huff University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees offers flexibility for students interested in computer science and related fields. Choosing the best degree to get is a critical decision, as it impacts future job opportunities and earning potential. Some degrees open doors to high-demand careers in technology, engineering, and data analytics.

If you are considering graduate education, you may be interested in the easiest master degree to get. These programs can be an excellent way to advance your qualifications, often with a manageable course load and flexible study options for working professionals.

Doctoral programs increasingly cater to online learners seeking affordability. The cheapest doctorate degree online options allow students to pursue the highest level of education without a heavy financial burden.

For those aiming for leadership roles in education, there are online edd programs affordable and designed for rapid completion. These programs can fast-track your career progression while keeping tuition costs in check.

Best Scientists Citing James J. Cimino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles