World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
11732
World Ranking
7979
National Ranking
204

Mats Dynesius publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mats Dynesius sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 73 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mats Dynesius D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mats Dynesius sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mats Dynesius is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their research focuses on several interconnected areas within agricultural and biological sciences, particularly in forest ecology and biodiversity studies.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Their subfields of study encompass:

  • Insect Science
  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science
  • Global and Planetary Change

The principal research topics they have been involved in include:

  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Lichen and fungal ecology
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology

Their recent published papers illustrate specific research interests and include:

  • "Restoration measures emulating natural disturbances alter beetle assemblages in boreal forest" (2020, Forest Ecology and Management)
  • "Bryophyte species composition at the stand scale (1 ha) - Differences between secondary stands half a century after clear-cutting and older semi-natural boreal forests" (2020, Forest Ecology and Management)
  • "The European palaeoecological record of Swedish red-listed beetles" (2021, Biological Conservation)

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations are:

  • Therese Löfroth
  • Jörgen Olsson
  • Jean-Michel Roberge
  • Joakim Hjältén
  • Tone Birkemoe

The publication venues where Mats Dynesius has most commonly published are:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Biological Conservation

Best Publications

  • Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems

    Christer Nilsson;Christer Nilsson;Catherine A. Reidy;Catherine A. Reidy;Mats Dynesius;Mats Dynesius;Carmen Revenga;Carmen Revenga

  • Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.

    Mats Dynesius;Christer Nilsson

  • Evolutionary consequences of changes in species' geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations

    Mats Dynesius;Roland Jansson

  • The Fate of Clades in a World of Recurrent Climatic Change: Milankovitch Oscillations and Evolution

    Roland Jansson;Mats Dynesius

  • Effects of river regulation on river-margin vegetation : A comparison of eight boreal rivers

    Roland Jansson;Christer Nilsson;Christer Nilsson;Mats Dynesius;Elisabet Andersson

  • Spatial and Temporal Variability in Growing-Season Net Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Exchange at a Large Peatland in Ontario, Canada

    Jill L. Bubier;Gaytri Bhatia;Tim R. Moore;Nigel T. Roulet

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • Local temperatures inferred from plant communities suggest strong spatial buffering of climate warming across Northern Europe

    Jonathan Lenoir;Bente Jessen Graae;Per Arild Aarrestad;Inger Greve Alsos

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • A Comparison of Species Richness and Traits of Riparian Plants between a Main River Channel and Its Tributaries

    Christer Nilsson;Alf Ekblad;Mats Dynesius;Susanne Backe

  • Plant Species Numbers Predicted by a Topography-based Groundwater Flow Index

    Ursula Zinko;Jan Seibert;Jan Seibert;Mats Dynesius;Christer Nilsson

  • SUBSTRATE FORM DETERMINES THE FATE OF BRYOPHYTES IN RIPARIAN BUFFER STRIPS

    Kristoffer Hylander;Mats Dynesius;I Bengt Gunnar Jonsson;Christer Nilsson;Christer Nilsson

  • Ecological effects of river regulation on mammals and birds: A review

    Christer Nilsson;Mats Dynesius

  • Effects of slash harvest on bryophytes and vascular plants in southern boreal forest clear‐cuts

    Marcus Åström;Mats Dynesius;Kristoffer Hylander;Christer Nilsson

  • Eighteen years of tree mortality and structural change in an experimentally fragmented Norway spruce forest

    Mari T. Jönsson;Shawn Fraver;Bengt Gunnar Jonsson;Mats Dynesius

  • Persistence of within-species lineages: a neglected control of speciation rates.

    Mats Dynesius;Roland Jansson

  • Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity

    Fredrik Stenbacka;Joakim Hjältén;Jacek Hilszczański;Mats Dynesius

  • Dating uprooted trees: comparison and application of eight methods in a boreal forest

    Mats Dynesius;Bengt Gunnar Jonsson

  • Slope aspect modifies community responses to clear-cutting in boreal forests.

    Marcus Åström;Mats Dynesius;Kristoffer Hylander;Christer Nilsson

  • Resilience of bryophyte communities to clear-cutting of boreal stream-side forests

    Mats Dynesius;Kristoffer Hylander

  • Uprooting in boreal spruce forests: long-term variation in disturbance rate

    Bengt Gunnar Jonsson;Mats Dynesius

Frequent Co-Authors

Christer Nilsson
Christer Nilsson Umeå University
Kristoffer Hylander
Kristoffer Hylander Stockholm University
Joakim Hjältén
Joakim Hjältén Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Jörg Brunet
Jörg Brunet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Alain Dejean
Alain Dejean Paul Sabatier University
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Tony R. Walker
Tony R. Walker Dalhousie University
Jérémy Bouyer
Jérémy Bouyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Ecology and Evolution opens up a diverse range of career opportunities in science, research, and education. However, many students are interested in how online programs can fast-track their professional journey while accommodating a flexible schedule.

For those considering parallel healthcare careers, online nursing degrees are a popular alternative. Programs like the rn to bsn online option help registered nurses quickly advance their qualifications. Similarly, bridge programs such as the adn to np enable swift progression from associate to advanced nursing practice.

Even individuals without a nursing background can access healthcare professions through innovative pathways like online direct entry msn programs. For those focused on efficiency, learning how to become a nurse practitioner in the shortest possible time offers valuable insights.

Whether your passion lies with environmental science or healthcare, online degrees and bridge programs offer flexible options to reach your goals and respond to today’s urgent global challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Mats Dynesius

Trending Scientists