World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edoardo M. Airoldi

Edoardo M. Airoldi

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
19941
World Ranking
6650
National Ranking
2938

Edoardo M. Airoldi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edoardo M. Airoldi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 173 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Edoardo M. Airoldi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edoardo M. Airoldi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)
  • 2012 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Edoardo M. Airoldi is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their research spans several fields within mathematics, particularly focusing on statistics and probability.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Stacking models for nearly optimal link prediction in complex networks, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition), 2021, Americanae (AECID Library)
  • Identification and Estimation of Treatment and Interference Effects in Observational Studies on Networks, 2020, Journal of the American Statistical Association
  • Induction of social contagion for diverse outcomes in structured experiments in isolated villages, 2024, Science
  • Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative With COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Airoldi frequently collaborates with the following coauthors:

  • Laura Forastiere
  • Rachel R. Kelz
  • Luke Keele
  • Nicholas A. Christakis
  • Kathryn Turnbull

Their publications often appear in these venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association
  • UNC Libraries

The primary area of study is mathematics, with subfields including:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • General Health Professions
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Main topics addressed in their work consist of:

  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods

Airoldi has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2020 and a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;David M. Blei;Stephen E. Fienberg;Eric P. Xing

  • A Survey of Statistical Network Models

    Anna Goldenberg;Alice X. Zheng;Stephen E. Fienberg;Edoardo M. Airoldi

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences

    Margaret E. Roberts;Brandon M. Stewart;Edoardo M. Airoldi

  • The structural topic model and applied social science

    Margaret Roberts;Brandon Stewart;Dustin Tingley;Edoardo Airoldi

  • Stochastic blockmodels with a growing number of classes.

    David S. Choi;Patrick J. Wolfe;Edoardo M. Airoldi

  • Summarizing topical content with word frequency and exclusivity

    Jonathan Bischof;Edoardo M. Airoldi

  • Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues.

    Alexander Franks;Edoardo M. Airoldi;Nikolai Slavov

  • Quantitative visualization of alternative exon expression from RNA-seq data.

    Yarden Katz;Eric T. Wang;Jacob Silterra;Schraga Schwartz

  • Mixed Membership Stochastic Block Models for Relational Data with Application to Protein-Protein Interactions

    E. M. Airoldi;D. M. Blei;S. E. Fienberg;E. P. Xing

  • Stochastic blockmodel approximation of a graphon: Theory and consistent estimation

    Edoardo M Airoldi;Thiago B Costa;Stanley H Chan

  • Integrating utility into face de-identification

    Ralph Gross;Edoardo Airoldi;Bradley Malin;Latanya Sweeney

  • Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;David Blei;Elena A. Erosheva;Stephen E. Fienberg

  • Block-LDA: Jointly Modeling Entity-Annotated Text and Entity-Entity Links

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;David M. Blei;Elena A. Erosheva;Stephen E. Fienberg

  • Care and Feeding of Topic Models: Problems, Diagnostics, and Improvements

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;David M. Blei;Elena A. Erosheva;Stephen E. Fienberg

  • A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics

    Tuan Q. Phan;Edoardo M. Airoldi

  • Improving and Evaluating Topic Models and Other Models of Text

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;Jonathan M. Bischof

  • Identification and Estimation of Treatment and Interference Effects in Observational Studies on Networks

    Laura Forastiere;Edoardo M. Airoldi;Fabrizia Mealli

  • Stacking models for nearly optimal link prediction in complex networks.

    Amir Ghasemian;Amir Ghasemian;Amir Ghasemian;Homa Hosseinmardi;Aram Galstyan;Edoardo M. Airoldi

  • Predicting Cellular Growth from Gene Expression Signatures

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;Curtis Huttenhower;David Gresham;Charles Lu

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
David M. Blei
David M. Blei Columbia University
Eric P. Xing
Eric P. Xing Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Bradley A. Malin
Bradley A. Malin Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Dustin Tran
Dustin Tran Google (United States)
Olga G. Troyanskaya
Olga G. Troyanskaya Princeton University
Alexander van Oudenaarden
Alexander van Oudenaarden University Medical Center Utrecht
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A computer science degree opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities. Many students also explore related fields, such as engineering or environmental science, to diversify their skills and job options. For those interested in merging technology with environmental challenges, exploring jobs for environmental science majors can offer insight into eco-focused tech roles like environmental data analysis or sustainability consulting.

If you're eager to accelerate your path into the tech workforce, consider a fast track computer science degree. These programs are ideal for motivated learners looking to earn their degree more quickly and start building experience sooner.

Online education also makes it possible to branch into specialized engineering fields. You might explore an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online for careers in green technology, or pursue online mechanical engineering degrees for roles in robotics, product design, or manufacturing.

Each of these online pathways can complement a foundation in computer science, broadening your expertise and enhancing your career prospects in a rapidly evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Edoardo M. Airoldi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles