World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
109
Citations
122521
World Ranking
230
National Ranking
129

David M. Blei publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Blei sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 332 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David M. Blei D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Blei sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2015 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the theory and practice of probabilistic topic modeling and Bayesian machine learning.
  • 2013 - ACM Prize in Computing For pioneering the area of topic modeling, which has had profound influence on machine learning foundations as well as industrial practice.
  • 2010 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

David M. Blei is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the field of computer science, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and statistics and probability. Their work also intersects with molecular biology, economics and econometrics, and immunology.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Topic Modeling
  • Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods

David M. Blei has contributed extensively to multiple venues, with frequent publications in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Their recent papers include:

  • "Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians" (2023), published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University
  • "Starfysh integrates spatial transcriptomic and histologic data to reveal heterogeneous tumor-immune hubs" (2024), published in Nature Biotechnology
  • "Adjusting for indirectly measured confounding using large-scale propensity score" (2022), published in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • "SHOPPER: A probabilistic model of consumer choice with substitutes and complements" (2020), published in The Annals of Applied Statistics
  • "Counterfactual inference for consumer choice across many product categories" (2021), published in Quantitative Marketing and Economics

The scientist has frequently collaborated with several notable co-authors, including:

  • Achille Nazaret
  • Zhaoran Wang
  • John P. Cunningham
  • Claudia Shi
  • Keyon Vafa

David M. Blei's recognition includes being named an ACM Fellow in 2015 for contributions to probabilistic topic modeling and Bayesian machine learning. In 2013, they received the ACM Prize in Computing for pioneering work in topic modeling, influencing machine learning both theoretically and practically.

Additional honors include being a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2017 and a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2010. These awards reflect engagement with foundational aspects of machine learning, probabilistic modeling, and applied statistics.

Best Publications

  • Latent dirichlet allocation

    David M. Blei;Andrew Y. Ng;Michael I. Jordan

  • Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians

    David M. Blei;Alp Kucukelbir;Jon D. McAuliffe

  • Probabilistic topic models

    David M. Blei

  • Sharing Clusters among Related Groups: Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes

    Yee W. Teh;Michael I. Jordan;Matthew J. Beal;David M. Blei

  • Dynamic topic models

    David M. Blei;John D. Lafferty

  • Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models

    Jonathan Chang;Sean Gerrish;Chong Wang;Jordan L. Boyd-graber

  • Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels

    Edoardo M. Airoldi;David M. Blei;Stephen E. Fienberg;Eric P. Xing

  • Stochastic variational inference

    Matthew D. Hoffman;David M. Blei;Chong Wang;John Paisley

  • A correlated topic model of Science

    David M. Blei;John D. Lafferty

  • Matching words and pictures

    Kobus Barnard;Pinar Duygulu;David Forsyth;Nando de Freitas

  • Online Learning for Latent Dirichlet Allocation

    Matthew Hoffman;Francis R. Bach;David M. Blei

  • Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles

    Chong Wang;David M. Blei

  • Variational Inference for Dirichlet Process Mixtures

    David M. Blei;Michael I. Jordan

  • Supervised Topic Models

    David M. Blei;Jon D. Mcauliffe

  • Correlated Topic Models

    John D. Lafferty;David M. Blei

  • Modeling annotated data

    David M. Blei;Michael I. Jordan

  • Hierarchical Topic Models and the Nested Chinese Restaurant Process

    Thomas L. Griffiths;Michael I. Jordan;Joshua B. Tenenbaum;David M. Blei

  • Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding

    Paul DiMaggio;Manish Nag;David Blei

  • Black Box Variational Inference

    Rajesh Ranganath;Sean Gerrish;David M. Blei

  • The nested chinese restaurant process and bayesian nonparametric inference of topic hierarchies

    David M. Blei;Thomas L. Griffiths;Michael I. Jordan

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajesh Ranganath
Rajesh Ranganath New York University
Edoardo M. Airoldi
Edoardo M. Airoldi Temple University
Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
Dustin Tran
Dustin Tran Google (United States)
Michael I. Jordan
Michael I. Jordan University of California, Berkeley
John Paisley
John Paisley Columbia University
Matthew D. Hoffman
Matthew D. Hoffman Google (United States)
Eric P. Xing
Eric P. Xing Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Jordan Boyd-Graber
Jordan Boyd-Graber University of Maryland, College Park
Samuel J. Gershman
Samuel J. Gershman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens doors to a range of related programs and career opportunities. Alongside core computer science study, many students consider branching into technical areas with strong career prospects.

For those interested in expanding their expertise, the best online electrical engineering programs USA offer a blend of practical and theoretical training in areas closely related to computing. Alternatively, if you are seeking quicker credentials, check out certifications that pay well to enhance your resume and boost your employability in a short period.

Time is an important consideration for many students. The shortest master degree programs can help you gain advanced skills and credentials without spending years in school. It's also crucial to choose a graduate path with a strong return on investment; discover graduate degrees that are worth it to ensure your education leads to valuable, in-demand career options.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Blei

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles