World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
10458
World Ranking
5605
National Ranking
2559

Mathematics

D-Index
46
Citations
7619
World Ranking
1376
National Ranking
612

Carey E. Priebe publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey E. Priebe sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 321 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Carey E. Priebe D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey E. Priebe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Carey E. Priebe is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has a substantial body of research primarily situated within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans topics related to Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Statistics and Probability.

The research topics associated with Priebe include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Priebe has published extensively, with a strong presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Applied Network Science, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, and the Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Priebe include:

  • "The connectome of an insect brain," 2023, Science
  • "A Statistical Interpretation of Spectral Embedding: The Generalised Random Dot Product Graph," 2022, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
  • "Variability and heritability of mouse brain structure: Microscopic MRI atlases and connectomes for diverse strains," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Eliminating accidental deviations to minimize generalization error and maximize replicability: Applications in connectomics and genomics," 2021, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "One-Hot Graph Encoder Embedding," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Frequent collaborators in Priebe's research include Youngser Park, Hayden S. Helm, Joshua T Vogelstein, Vince Lyzinski, and Avanti Athreya. The volume of collaboration with these coauthors ranges from 20 to 43 joint publications.

In recognition of their contributions, Carey E. Priebe was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2002.

Best Publications

  • The complete connectome of a learning and memory centre in an insect brain

    Katharina Eichler;Feng Li;Ashok Litwin-Kumar;Youngser Park

  • Scan Statistics on Enron Graphs

    Carey E. Priebe;John M. Conroy;David J. Marchette;Youngser Park

  • A Consistent Adjacency Spectral Embedding for Stochastic Blockmodel Graphs

    Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Donniell E. Fishkind;Carey E. Priebe

  • Discovery of Brainwide Neural-Behavioral Maps via Multiscale Unsupervised Structure Learning

    Joshua T. Vogelstein;Youngser Park;Tomoko Ohyama;Rex A. Kerr

  • COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY

    Kevin S. Woods;Christopher C. Doss;Kevin W. Bowyer;Jeffrey L. Solka

  • FlashGraph: processing billion-node graphs on an array of commodity SSDs

    Da Zheng;Disa Mhembere;Randal Burns;Joshua Vogelstein

  • Random Forests for Photometric Redshifts

    Samuel Carliles;Tamás Budavári;Sébastien Heinis;Carey Priebe

  • Fast approximate quadratic programming for graph matching.

    Joshua T. Vogelstein;John M. Conroy;Vince Lyzinski;Louis J. Podrazik

  • Universally consistent vertex classification for latent positions graphs

    Minh Tang;Daniel L. Sussman;Carey E. Priebe

  • Community Detection and Classification in Hierarchical Stochastic Blockmodels

    Vince Lyzinski;Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya;Youngser Park

  • Statistical inference on random dot product graphs: a survey

    Avanti Athreya;Donniell E. Fishkind;Minh Tang;Carey E. Priebe

  • Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk

    Vince Lyzinski;Donniell E. Fishkind;Marcelo Fiori;Joshua T. Vogelstein

  • A Semiparametric Two-Sample Hypothesis Testing Problem for Random Graphs

    Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya;Daniel L. Sussman;Vince Lyzinski

  • A statistical interpretation of spectral embedding: the generalised random dot product graph

    Patrick Rubin-Delanchy;Carey E. Priebe;Minh Tang;Joshua Cape

  • Consistent Latent Position Estimation and Vertex Classification for Random Dot Product Graphs

    Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Carey E. Priebe

  • Perfect clustering for stochastic blockmodel graphs via adjacency spectral embedding

    Vince Lyzinski;Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya

  • A Limit Theorem for Scaled Eigenvectors of Random Dot Product Graphs

    A. Athreya;C. E. Priebe;M. Tang;V. Lyzinski

  • Consistent Adjacency-Spectral Partitioning for the Stochastic Block Model When the Model Parameters Are Unknown

    Donniell E. Fishkind;Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Joshua T. Vogelstein

  • Locality Statistics for Anomaly Detection in Time Series of Graphs

    Heng Wang;Minh Tang;Youngser Park;Carey E. Priebe

  • A nonparametric two-sample hypothesis testing problem for random graphs

    Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya;Daniel L. Sussman;Vince Lyzinski

  • Statistical inference on random dot product graphs: a survey

    Avanti Athreya;Donniell E. Fishkind;Keith Levin;Vince Lyzinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua T. Vogelstein
Joshua T. Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University
Randal Burns
Randal Burns Johns Hopkins University
Michael A. Rosen
Michael A. Rosen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sanjeev Khudanpur
Sanjeev Khudanpur Johns Hopkins University
Alexander S. Szalay
Alexander S. Szalay Johns Hopkins University
Mauro Maggioni
Mauro Maggioni Johns Hopkins University
Albert Cardona
Albert Cardona University of Cambridge
Michael W. Mahoney
Michael W. Mahoney University of California, Berkeley
Ting Xu
Ting Xu University of California, Davis
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career paths. A master in data analytics is an excellent option for those interested in turning mathematical skills into actionable business insights. This growing field leverages statistical analysis and computational techniques, making it a natural extension for math graduates.

For those looking to combine quantitative skills with leadership abilities, pursuing an MBA might be the next step. Many students consider enrolling in the easiest MBA programs to get into, which can provide flexibility and accessibility without sacrificing quality. Alternatively, easy online MBA programs offer a convenient option for working professionals aiming to enhance their managerial expertise while continuing to work.

For those interested in advanced business leadership roles, exploring the dba online programs can be a valuable step. These Doctorate of Business Administration programs combine rigorous research with practical business strategies, complementing mathematical analytical skills with high-level decision-making capabilities.

Best Scientists Citing Carey E. Priebe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles