World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 46 1376 1183 613 488 321 7619
Computer Science 50 5606 5448 2560 2472 378 10458

Carey E. Priebe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carey E. Priebe between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carey E. Priebe published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 21 of the 462 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 1988: 5 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

462 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carey E. Priebe: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 5
1989 1
1990 1
1991 3
1992 6
1993 12
1994 9
1995 5
1996 2
1997 9
1998 5
1999 2
2000 4
2001 9
2002 3
2003 9
2004 4
2005 7
2006 5
2007 8
2008 11
2009 5
2010 10
2011 15
2012 12
2013 23
2014 12
2015 16
2016 23
2017 26
2018 12
2019 31
2020 34
2021 35
2022 25
2023 20
2024 22
2025 20
2026 1
Total 462
Download as CSV

Carey E. Priebe publications per year - data summary

  • Carey E. Priebe, a Mathematics scholar from Johns Hopkins University, has 462 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 35 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1990 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 11.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.8 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 88 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 64 publications (4.9 per year); 2001-2013: 121 publications (9.3 per year); 2014-2026: 277 publications (21.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Carey E. Priebe publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey E. Priebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 317–321 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 321 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13 321
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Carey E. Priebe publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 42–46 to 537+ publications.
  • Carey E. Priebe, a Mathematics scholar from Johns Hopkins University, records 321 publications - the 88th percentile of the discipline.
  • 88% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Carey E. Priebe, and about 12% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 172–176 publications range, and Carey E. Priebe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–146 publications, holding 112 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 47% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 537 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Carey E. Priebe D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey E. Priebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103 46
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Carey E. Priebe D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 57 ranges running from 30 to 86+ D-Index.
  • Carey E. Priebe, a Mathematics scholar from Johns Hopkins University, records 46 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Carey E. Priebe, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Carey E. Priebe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 30 D-Index, holding 174 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Carey E. Priebe is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has a substantial body of research primarily situated within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans topics related to Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Statistics and Probability.

The research topics associated with Priebe include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Priebe has published extensively, with a strong presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Applied Network Science, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, and the Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Priebe include:

  • "The connectome of an insect brain," 2023, Science
  • "A Statistical Interpretation of Spectral Embedding: The Generalised Random Dot Product Graph," 2022, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
  • "Variability and heritability of mouse brain structure: Microscopic MRI atlases and connectomes for diverse strains," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Eliminating accidental deviations to minimize generalization error and maximize replicability: Applications in connectomics and genomics," 2021, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "One-Hot Graph Encoder Embedding," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Frequent collaborators in Priebe's research include Youngser Park, Hayden S. Helm, Joshua T Vogelstein, Vince Lyzinski, and Avanti Athreya. The volume of collaboration with these coauthors ranges from 20 to 43 joint publications.

In recognition of their contributions, Carey E. Priebe was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2002.

Best Publications

  • The complete connectome of a learning and memory centre in an insect brain

    Katharina Eichler;Feng Li;Ashok Litwin-Kumar;Youngser Park

  • Scan Statistics on Enron Graphs

    Carey E. Priebe;John M. Conroy;David J. Marchette;Youngser Park

  • A Consistent Adjacency Spectral Embedding for Stochastic Blockmodel Graphs

    Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Donniell E. Fishkind;Carey E. Priebe

  • Discovery of Brainwide Neural-Behavioral Maps via Multiscale Unsupervised Structure Learning

    Joshua T. Vogelstein;Youngser Park;Tomoko Ohyama;Rex A. Kerr

  • COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY

    Kevin S. Woods;Christopher C. Doss;Kevin W. Bowyer;Jeffrey L. Solka

  • FlashGraph: processing billion-node graphs on an array of commodity SSDs

    Da Zheng;Disa Mhembere;Randal Burns;Joshua Vogelstein

  • Random Forests for Photometric Redshifts

    Samuel Carliles;Tamás Budavári;Sébastien Heinis;Carey Priebe

  • Fast approximate quadratic programming for graph matching.

    Joshua T. Vogelstein;John M. Conroy;Vince Lyzinski;Louis J. Podrazik

  • Universally consistent vertex classification for latent positions graphs

    Minh Tang;Daniel L. Sussman;Carey E. Priebe

  • Community Detection and Classification in Hierarchical Stochastic Blockmodels

    Vince Lyzinski;Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya;Youngser Park

  • Statistical inference on random dot product graphs: a survey

    Avanti Athreya;Donniell E. Fishkind;Minh Tang;Carey E. Priebe

  • Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk

    Vince Lyzinski;Donniell E. Fishkind;Marcelo Fiori;Joshua T. Vogelstein

  • A Semiparametric Two-Sample Hypothesis Testing Problem for Random Graphs

    Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya;Daniel L. Sussman;Vince Lyzinski

  • A statistical interpretation of spectral embedding: the generalised random dot product graph

    Patrick Rubin-Delanchy;Carey E. Priebe;Minh Tang;Joshua Cape

  • Consistent Latent Position Estimation and Vertex Classification for Random Dot Product Graphs

    Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Carey E. Priebe

  • Perfect clustering for stochastic blockmodel graphs via adjacency spectral embedding

    Vince Lyzinski;Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya

  • A Limit Theorem for Scaled Eigenvectors of Random Dot Product Graphs

    A. Athreya;C. E. Priebe;M. Tang;V. Lyzinski

  • Consistent Adjacency-Spectral Partitioning for the Stochastic Block Model When the Model Parameters Are Unknown

    Donniell E. Fishkind;Daniel L. Sussman;Minh Tang;Joshua T. Vogelstein

  • Locality Statistics for Anomaly Detection in Time Series of Graphs

    Heng Wang;Minh Tang;Youngser Park;Carey E. Priebe

  • A nonparametric two-sample hypothesis testing problem for random graphs

    Minh Tang;Avanti Athreya;Daniel L. Sussman;Vince Lyzinski

  • Statistical inference on random dot product graphs: a survey

    Avanti Athreya;Donniell E. Fishkind;Keith Levin;Vince Lyzinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua T. Vogelstein
Joshua T. Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University
Randal Burns
Randal Burns Johns Hopkins University
Michael A. Rosen
Michael A. Rosen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sanjeev Khudanpur
Sanjeev Khudanpur Johns Hopkins University
Alexander S. Szalay
Alexander S. Szalay Johns Hopkins University
Mauro Maggioni
Mauro Maggioni Johns Hopkins University
Albert Cardona
Albert Cardona University of Cambridge
Michael W. Mahoney
Michael W. Mahoney University of California, Berkeley
Ting Xu
Ting Xu University of California, Davis
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career paths. A master in data analytics is an excellent option for those interested in turning mathematical skills into actionable business insights. This growing field leverages statistical analysis and computational techniques, making it a natural extension for math graduates.

For those looking to combine quantitative skills with leadership abilities, pursuing an MBA might be the next step. Many students consider enrolling in the easiest MBA programs to get into, which can provide flexibility and accessibility without sacrificing quality. Alternatively, easy online MBA programs offer a convenient option for working professionals aiming to enhance their managerial expertise while continuing to work.

For those interested in advanced business leadership roles, exploring the dba online programs can be a valuable step. These Doctorate of Business Administration programs combine rigorous research with practical business strategies, complementing mathematical analytical skills with high-level decision-making capabilities.

Best Scientists Citing Carey E. Priebe

Trending Scientists