World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias Teschner

Matthias Teschner

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
9790
World Ranking
6790
National Ranking
324

Matthias Teschner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Teschner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthias Teschner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Teschner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Teschner is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany and works primarily in the field of Engineering. Their research focuses on Computational Mechanics and explores various subfields, including Ecological Modeling, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics covered in their research involve Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies, Erosion and Abrasive Machining, Landslides and related hazards, Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics, and Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques.

They have published multiple papers in well-known venues. Some notable papers include:

  • Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Techniques for the Physics Based Simulation of Fluids and Solids, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An implicit compressible SPH solver for snow simulation, 2020, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • A Survey on SPH Methods in Computer Graphics, 2022, Computer Graphics Forum
  • Magnetic-assisted soft abrasive flow machining studied with smoothed particle hydrodynamics, 2021, Applied Mathematical Modelling
  • Particle-Based Numerical Simulation Study of Solid Particle Erosion of Ductile Materials Leading to an Erosion Model, Including the Particle Shape Effect, 2021, Materials

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Matthias Teschner include:

  • Dan Koschier
  • Jan Bender
  • Barbara Solenthaler
  • Shoya Mohseni-Mofidi
  • Claas Bierwisch

The primary venues for their publications are:

  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Applied Mathematical Modelling
  • Materials

Research conducted by Matthias Teschner has emphasized simulation techniques, particularly involving smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) methods. This is reflected in papers related to fluid and solid physics-based simulation, snow simulation, and abrasive flow machining, highlighting interdisciplinary applications crossing engineering and applied mathematical modeling.

Best Publications

  • Collision Detection for Deformable Objects

    M. Teschner;S. Kimmerle;B. Heidelberger;G. Zachmann

  • Meshless deformations based on shape matching

    Matthias Müller;Bruno Heidelberger;Matthias Teschner;Markus Gross

  • Optimized Spatial Hashing for Collision Detection of Deformable Objects.

    Matthias Teschner;Bruno Heidelberger;Matthias Müller;Danat Pomerantes

  • Weakly compressible SPH for free surface flows

    Markus Becker;Matthias Teschner

  • Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPH

    Nadir Akinci;Markus Ihmsen;Gizem Akinci;Barbara Solenthaler

  • Implicit Incompressible SPH

    Markus Ihmsen;Jens Cornelis;Barbara Solenthaler;Christopher Horvath

  • Interaction of fluids with deformable solids

    Matthias Müller;Simon Schirm;Matthias Teschner;Bruno Heidelberger

  • A versatile and robust model for geometrically complex deformable solids

    M. Teschner;B. Heidelberger;M. Muller;M. Gross

  • Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.

    Marc Christian Metzger;Bettina Hohlweg-Majert;Uli Schwarz;Matthias Teschner

  • A Parallel SPH Implementation on Multi-Core CPUs

    Markus Ihmsen;Nadir Akinci;Markus Becker;Matthias Teschner

  • SPH Fluids in Computer Graphics

    Markus Ihmsen;Jens Orthmann;Barbara Solenthaler;Andreas Kolb

  • CoRdE: Cosserat rod elements for the dynamic simulation of one-dimensional elastic objects

    J. Spillmann;M. Teschner

  • Versatile surface tension and adhesion for SPH fluids

    Nadir Akinci;Gizem Akinci;Matthias Teschner

  • A Survey on Position-Based Simulation Methods in Computer Graphics

    Jan Bender;Matthias Müller;Miguel A. Otaduy;Matthias Teschner

  • A state machine for real-time cutting of tetrahedral meshes

    D. Bielser;P. Glardon;M. Teschner;M. Gross

  • Interactive blood simulation for virtual surgery based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics

    Matthias Müller;Simon Schirm;Matthias Teschner

  • Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

    Marc Christian Metzger;Bettina Hohlweg-Majert;Ralf Schön;Matthias Teschner

  • Detection of Collisions and Self-collisions Using Image-space Techniques.

    Bruno Heidelberger;Matthias Teschner;Markus H. Gross

  • Real-Time Volumetric Intersections of Deforming Objects

    Bruno Heidelberger;Matthias Teschner;Markus H. Gross

  • Direct Forcing for Lagrangian Rigid-Fluid Coupling

    M. Becker;H. Tessendorf;M. Teschner

  • Consistent penetration depth estimation for deformable collision response

    Bruno Heidelberger;Matthias Teschner;Richard Keiser;Markus Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Gross
Markus Gross ETH Zurich
Matthias Müller
Matthias Müller Nvidia (United States)
Wolfram Burgard
Wolfram Burgard University of Technology Nuremberg
Cyrill Stachniss
Cyrill Stachniss University of Bonn
Marie-Paule Cani
Marie-Paule Cani École Polytechnique
Miguel A. Otaduy
Miguel A. Otaduy King Juan Carlos University
Bernhard Nebel
Bernhard Nebel University of Freiburg
Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann
Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann University of Geneva
Bernd Girod
Bernd Girod Stanford University
Chris Wojtan
Chris Wojtan Institute of Science and Technology Austria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Computer Science students in the USA enjoy flexible options for advancing their education and careers. For those seeking quick entry into the tech workforce, easy certifications to get online offer targeted skills that can result in strong salary prospects and job opportunities.

If you want a more comprehensive qualification in a shorter timeframe, exploring the fastest online master's degree programs could help you build advanced expertise and move up the career ladder efficiently.

It’s important to choose programs that offer long-term value. Some of the most in-demand fields can be found among today’s graduate degrees that are worth it, balancing strong earnings potential with career stability.

For those looking to begin their education or upskill quickly, 2 year online degrees are an accessible way to build foundational knowledge in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Teschner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles