World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
74
Citations
25651
World Ranking
1471
National Ranking
766

Michael W. Mahoney publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Mahoney sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 307 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael W. Mahoney D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Mahoney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael W. Mahoney is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily concerns the domain of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their scholarship extends into related subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Mechanics, and Signal Processing.

The extent of Mahoney's published work includes 284 contributions within Computer Science, with 199 specifically in Artificial Intelligence, 45 in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 33 in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 30 in Computational Mechanics, and 17 in Signal Processing.

Topics frequently addressed in their research include:

  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Topic Modeling
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Mahoney has contributed papers to multiple publication venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Nature Communications
  • INFORMS Journal on Optimization
  • SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications

Some of the recent papers associated with Mahoney's research include:

  • "Q-BERT: Hessian Based Ultra Low Precision Quantization of BERT" (2020), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks" (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Shallow neural networks for fluid flow reconstruction with limited sensors" (2020), Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • "ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learning" (2021), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "AI and Memory Wall" (2024), IEEE Micro

Frequent collaborators in their academic work include Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami, N. Benjamin Erichson, Zhewei Yao, and Liam Hodgkinson. The collaborations with these coauthors indicate ongoing engagement with several experts in the fields of machine learning and computational science.

Best Publications

  • Community Structure in Large Networks: Natural Cluster Sizes and the Absence of Large Well-Defined Clusters

    Jure Leskovec;Kevin J. Lang;Anirban Dasgupta;Michael W. Mahoney

  • Empirical comparison of algorithms for network community detection

    Jure Leskovec;Kevin J. Lang;Michael Mahoney

  • Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks

    Jure Leskovec;Kevin J. Lang;Anirban Dasgupta;Michael W. Mahoney

  • On the Nyström Method for Approximating a Gram Matrix for Improved Kernel-Based Learning

    Petros Drineas;Michael W. Mahoney

  • CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis

    Michael W. Mahoney;Petros Drineas

  • A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference

    Amir Gholami;Sehoon Kim;Zhen Dong;Zhewei Yao

  • Randomized Algorithms for Matrices and Data

    Michael W. Mahoney

  • Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices II: Computing a Low-Rank Approximation to a Matrix

    Petros Drineas;Ravi Kannan;Michael W. Mahoney

  • Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions

    Petros Drineas;Michael W. Mahoney;S. Muthukrishnan

  • Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices I: Approximating Matrix Multiplication

    Petros Drineas;Ravi Kannan;Michael W. Mahoney

  • Faster least squares approximation

    Petros Drineas;Michael W. Mahoney;S. Muthukrishnan;Tamás Sarlós

  • Fast approximation of matrix coherence and statistical leverage

    Petros Drineas;Malik Magdon-Ismail;Michael W. Mahoney;David P. Woodruff

  • Q-BERT: Hessian Based Ultra Low Precision Quantization of BERT

    Sheng Shen;Zhen Dong;Jiayu Ye;Linjian Ma

  • HAWQ: Hessian AWare Quantization of Neural Networks With Mixed-Precision

    Zhen Dong;Zhewei Yao;Amir Gholami;Michael Mahoney

  • An improved approximation algorithm for the column subset selection problem

    Christos Boutsidis;Michael W. Mahoney;Petros Drineas

  • Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices III: Computing a Compressed Approximate Matrix Decomposition

    Petros Drineas;Ravi Kannan;Michael W. Mahoney

  • ZeroQ: A Novel Zero Shot Quantization Framework

    Yaohui Cai;Zhewei Yao;Zhen Dong;Amir Gholami

  • Revisiting the Nyström method for improved large-scale machine learning

    Alex Gittens;Michael W. Mahoney

  • PCA-correlated SNPs for structure identification in worldwide human populations.

    Peristera Paschou;Elad Ziv;Esteban G Burchard;Shweta Choudhry

  • Sampling algorithms for l2 regression and applications

    Petros Drineas;Michael W. Mahoney;S. Muthukrishnan

  • Sampling algorithms for l 2 regression and applications

    Petros Drineas;Michael W. Mahoney;S. Muthukrishnan

  • Fast approximation of matrix coherence and statistical leverage

    Petros Drineas;Malik Magdon-ismail;David Woodruff;Michael W. Mahoney

Frequent Co-Authors

Petros Drineas
Petros Drineas Purdue University West Lafayette
Kurt Keutzer
Kurt Keutzer University of California, Berkeley
David F. Gleich
David F. Gleich Purdue University West Lafayette
Ravi Kannan
Ravi Kannan Microsoft (United States)
David P. Woodruff
David P. Woodruff Carnegie Mellon University
Joseph E. Gonzalez
Joseph E. Gonzalez University of California, Berkeley
James Demmel
James Demmel University of California, Berkeley
Ananth Grama
Ananth Grama Purdue University West Lafayette
Malik Magdon-Ismail
Malik Magdon-Ismail Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Subbaratnam Muthukrishnan
Subbaratnam Muthukrishnan Kansas State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Computer Science, exploring related online degrees can open doors to in-demand technology jobs. There are quick degrees online that pay well, which can fast-track your entry into the tech workforce while offering flexible study options. These programs allow you to gain essential skills without the long commitment of a traditional on-campus degree.

As technology rapidly evolves, staying ahead with advanced knowledge is crucial. Pursuing the best online master's in artificial intelligence is a strategic choice for those seeking to specialize in AI, machine learning, or data science—fields that promise robust career growth.

If you’re wondering about the best long-term investment, take a look at the best college degrees for the future. These degrees are selected based on job market demand and potential earnings.

Those who want to enhance their credentials without an overwhelming workload may consider the easiest online masters degree options. These programs provide valuable qualifications with a manageable commitment, making them suitable for busy professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Mahoney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles