World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Saudi Arabia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 83 1397 1324 3 3 231 37954

Jesse Poland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jesse Poland between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jesse Poland published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2021. 22 of the 302 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2021. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 13 publications
2003 2025

302 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jesse Poland: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 5
2012 7
2013 10
2014 12
2015 20
2016 22
2017 20
2018 29
2019 29
2020 24
2021 44
2022 33
2023 21
2024 9
2025 13
Total 302
Download as CSV

Jesse Poland publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Poland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 225–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143 231
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Jesse Poland D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Poland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110 83
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in Saudi Arabia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in Saudi Arabia Leader Award

Overview

Jesse Poland is affiliated with the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these domains, their work is particularly focused on subfields including Plant Science, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, and Ecology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, notably Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology, Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals, Genetics and Plant Breeding, Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics, Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, Bioenergy Crop Production and Management, and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jesse Poland include:

  • Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding, 2020, Nature
  • Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice, 2021, Molecular Plant
  • Population genomic analysis of Aegilops tauschii identifies targets for bread wheat improvement, 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • Chromosome-scale genome assembly provides insights into rye biology, evolution and agronomic potential, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Breeder friendly phenotyping, 2020, Plant Science

Their collaborative work involves frequent co-authors such as Ravi P. Singh, Sandesh Shrestha, Jean-Luc Jannink, Kauê de Sousa, and Carlo Fadda, with whom they have partnered on numerous publications.

Jesse Poland's output is distributed across several notable publication venues including Harvard Dataverse, Frontiers in Plant Science, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Plant Genome, and Theoretical and Applied Genetics. These outlets reflect the breadth of research activities and the multidisciplinary nature of their scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species

    Robert J. Elshire;Jeffrey C. Glaubitz;Qi-ying Sun;Jesse A. Poland

  • Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome

    Rudi Appels;Rudi Appels;Kellye Eversole;Nils Stein;Nils Stein

  • A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome

    Klaus F. X. Mayer;Jane Rogers;Jaroslav Doležel

  • Development of High-Density Genetic Maps for Barley and Wheat Using a Novel Two-Enzyme Genotyping-by-Sequencing Approach

    Jesse A. Poland;Jesse A. Poland;Patrick J. Brown;Mark E. Sorrells;Jean Luc Jannink;Jean Luc Jannink

  • A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome

    Klaus F.X. Mayer;Robbie Waugh;Peter Langridge;Timothy J. Close

  • A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome

    Martin Mascher;Heidrun Gundlach;Axel Himmelbach;Sebastian Beier

  • Genotyping-by-Sequencing for Plant Breeding and Genetics

    Jesse A. Poland;Trevor W. Rife

  • Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding.

    Sean Walkowiak;Sean Walkowiak;Liangliang Gao;Cecile Monat;Georg Haberer

  • Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance.

    Jesse A. Poland;Peter J. Balint-Kurti;Randall J. Wisser;Randall J. Wisser;Richard C. Pratt

  • Genomic Selection in Wheat Breeding using Genotyping-by-Sequencing

    Jesse A. Poland;Jeffrey Endelman;Julie Dawson;Jessica Rutkoski

  • Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux

    Jer Ming Chia;Chi Song;Peter J. Bradbury;Peter J. Bradbury;Denise Costich;Denise Costich

  • Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize

    Jesse A. Poland;Peter J. Bradbury;Edward S. Buckler;Rebecca J. Nelson

  • Canopy temperature and vegetation indices from high-throughput phenotyping improve accuracy of pedigree and genomic selection for grain yield in wheat

    Jessica Rutkoski;Jessica Rutkoski;Jesse Poland;Suchismita Mondal;Enrique Autrique

  • Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection.

    Julio Isidro;Jean‑Luc Jannink;Deniz Akdemir;Jesse Poland

  • Resistance gene cloning from a wild crop relative by sequence capture and association genetics.

    Sanu Arora;Burkhard Steuernagel;Kumar Gaurav;Sutha Chandramohan

  • Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker × environment interaction genomic selection model.

    Marco Lopez-Cruz;Jose Crossa;David Bonnett;Susanne Dreisigacker

  • A maize resistance gene functions against bacterial streak disease in rice

    Bingyu Zhao;Xinghua Lin;Jesse Poland;Harold Trick

  • Anchoring and ordering NGS contig assemblies by population sequencing (POPSEQ)

    Martin Mascher;Gary J. Muehlbauer;Daniel S. Rokhsar;Daniel S. Rokhsar;Jarrod Chapman

  • A whole-genome shotgun approach for assembling and anchoring the hexaploid bread wheat genome

    Jarrod A Chapman;Martin Mascher;Aydın Buluç;Kerrie Barry

  • Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice.

    Jia-Ming Song;Jia-Ming Song;Wen-Zhao Xie;Shuo Wang;Yi-Xiong Guo

  • Application of unmanned aerial systems for high throughput phenotyping of large wheat breeding nurseries

    Atena Haghighattalab;Lorena González Pérez;Suchismita Mondal;Daljit Singh

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi P. Singh
Ravi P. Singh International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
José Crossa
José Crossa International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Susanne Dreisigacker
Susanne Dreisigacker International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Mark E. Sorrells
Mark E. Sorrells Cornell University
Suchismita Mondal
Suchismita Mondal Montana State University
Nils Stein
Nils Stein University of Western Australia
Jean-Luc Jannink
Jean-Luc Jannink Agricultural Research Service
Allan K. Fritz
Allan K. Fritz Kansas State University
Martin Mascher
Martin Mascher Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research
Julio Huerta-Espino
Julio Huerta-Espino International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning has opened up flexible paths for those interested in careers and advanced study in healthcare and genetics. For registered nurses who want to build on their training without extra clinical requirements, there are online rn to bsn no clinicals programs that allow for continued professional development while accommodating busy schedules.

Those seeking higher credentials might consider short dnp programs, which allow nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time—ideal for entering leadership roles or focusing on genetics research. If you’re interested in starting a healthcare career quickly, medical assistant programs accelerated offer a fast-track into clinical support jobs, with some programs leading to employment in as little as six weeks.

For those who prioritize program accessibility, exploring the easiest dnp programs may help you find reputable options that balance academic rigor with a manageable workload. These online pathways provide diverse opportunities to integrate genetics into clinical practice or research—and shape the future of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse Poland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles