World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Saudi Arabia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
83
Citations
37954
World Ranking
1397
National Ranking
3

Jesse Poland publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Poland sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Jesse Poland D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Poland sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in Saudi Arabia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in Saudi Arabia Leader Award

Overview

Jesse Poland is affiliated with the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these domains, their work is particularly focused on subfields including Plant Science, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, and Ecology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, notably Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology, Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals, Genetics and Plant Breeding, Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics, Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, Bioenergy Crop Production and Management, and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jesse Poland include:

  • Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding, 2020, Nature
  • Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice, 2021, Molecular Plant
  • Population genomic analysis of Aegilops tauschii identifies targets for bread wheat improvement, 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • Chromosome-scale genome assembly provides insights into rye biology, evolution and agronomic potential, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Breeder friendly phenotyping, 2020, Plant Science

Their collaborative work involves frequent co-authors such as Ravi P. Singh, Sandesh Shrestha, Jean-Luc Jannink, Kauê de Sousa, and Carlo Fadda, with whom they have partnered on numerous publications.

Jesse Poland's output is distributed across several notable publication venues including Harvard Dataverse, Frontiers in Plant Science, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Plant Genome, and Theoretical and Applied Genetics. These outlets reflect the breadth of research activities and the multidisciplinary nature of their scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species

    Robert J. Elshire;Jeffrey C. Glaubitz;Qi-ying Sun;Jesse A. Poland

  • Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome

    Rudi Appels;Rudi Appels;Kellye Eversole;Nils Stein;Nils Stein

  • A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome

    Klaus F. X. Mayer;Jane Rogers;Jaroslav Doležel

  • Development of High-Density Genetic Maps for Barley and Wheat Using a Novel Two-Enzyme Genotyping-by-Sequencing Approach

    Jesse A. Poland;Jesse A. Poland;Patrick J. Brown;Mark E. Sorrells;Jean Luc Jannink;Jean Luc Jannink

  • A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome

    Klaus F.X. Mayer;Robbie Waugh;Peter Langridge;Timothy J. Close

  • A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome

    Martin Mascher;Heidrun Gundlach;Axel Himmelbach;Sebastian Beier

  • Genotyping-by-Sequencing for Plant Breeding and Genetics

    Jesse A. Poland;Trevor W. Rife

  • Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding.

    Sean Walkowiak;Sean Walkowiak;Liangliang Gao;Cecile Monat;Georg Haberer

  • Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance.

    Jesse A. Poland;Peter J. Balint-Kurti;Randall J. Wisser;Randall J. Wisser;Richard C. Pratt

  • Genomic Selection in Wheat Breeding using Genotyping-by-Sequencing

    Jesse A. Poland;Jeffrey Endelman;Julie Dawson;Jessica Rutkoski

  • Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux

    Jer Ming Chia;Chi Song;Peter J. Bradbury;Peter J. Bradbury;Denise Costich;Denise Costich

  • Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize

    Jesse A. Poland;Peter J. Bradbury;Edward S. Buckler;Rebecca J. Nelson

  • Canopy temperature and vegetation indices from high-throughput phenotyping improve accuracy of pedigree and genomic selection for grain yield in wheat

    Jessica Rutkoski;Jessica Rutkoski;Jesse Poland;Suchismita Mondal;Enrique Autrique

  • Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection.

    Julio Isidro;Jean‑Luc Jannink;Deniz Akdemir;Jesse Poland

  • Resistance gene cloning from a wild crop relative by sequence capture and association genetics.

    Sanu Arora;Burkhard Steuernagel;Kumar Gaurav;Sutha Chandramohan

  • Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker × environment interaction genomic selection model.

    Marco Lopez-Cruz;Jose Crossa;David Bonnett;Susanne Dreisigacker

  • A maize resistance gene functions against bacterial streak disease in rice

    Bingyu Zhao;Xinghua Lin;Jesse Poland;Harold Trick

  • Anchoring and ordering NGS contig assemblies by population sequencing (POPSEQ)

    Martin Mascher;Gary J. Muehlbauer;Daniel S. Rokhsar;Daniel S. Rokhsar;Jarrod Chapman

  • A whole-genome shotgun approach for assembling and anchoring the hexaploid bread wheat genome

    Jarrod A Chapman;Martin Mascher;Aydın Buluç;Kerrie Barry

  • Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice.

    Jia-Ming Song;Jia-Ming Song;Wen-Zhao Xie;Shuo Wang;Yi-Xiong Guo

  • Application of unmanned aerial systems for high throughput phenotyping of large wheat breeding nurseries

    Atena Haghighattalab;Lorena González Pérez;Suchismita Mondal;Daljit Singh

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi P. Singh
Ravi P. Singh International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
José Crossa
José Crossa International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Susanne Dreisigacker
Susanne Dreisigacker International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Mark E. Sorrells
Mark E. Sorrells Cornell University
Suchismita Mondal
Suchismita Mondal Montana State University
Nils Stein
Nils Stein University of Western Australia
Jean-Luc Jannink
Jean-Luc Jannink Agricultural Research Service
Allan K. Fritz
Allan K. Fritz Kansas State University
Martin Mascher
Martin Mascher Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research
Julio Huerta-Espino
Julio Huerta-Espino International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning has opened up flexible paths for those interested in careers and advanced study in healthcare and genetics. For registered nurses who want to build on their training without extra clinical requirements, there are online rn to bsn no clinicals programs that allow for continued professional development while accommodating busy schedules.

Those seeking higher credentials might consider short dnp programs, which allow nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time—ideal for entering leadership roles or focusing on genetics research. If you’re interested in starting a healthcare career quickly, medical assistant programs accelerated offer a fast-track into clinical support jobs, with some programs leading to employment in as little as six weeks.

For those who prioritize program accessibility, exploring the easiest dnp programs may help you find reputable options that balance academic rigor with a manageable workload. These online pathways provide diverse opportunities to integrate genetics into clinical practice or research—and shape the future of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse Poland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles