World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Singapore
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2898 2651 10 10 187 12185

Edson C. Tandoc publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edson C. Tandoc between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edson C. Tandoc published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2019. 20 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2019. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
2008 2026

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edson C. Tandoc: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 6
2014 9
2015 13
2016 11
2017 18
2018 16
2019 28
2020 21
2021 24
2022 26
2023 18
2024 10
2025 19
2026 1
Total 228
Download as CSV

Edson C. Tandoc publications per year - data summary

  • Edson C. Tandoc, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Nanyang Technological University, has 228 publications recorded across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2008 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2008, 2011, 2012 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 12.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.0 per year counting only the 19 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 74 publications, 32% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2008-2014: 23 publications (3.3 per year); 2015-2021: 131 publications (18.7 per year); 2022-2026: 74 publications (14.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Edson C. Tandoc publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edson C. Tandoc sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 187 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 187
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Edson C. Tandoc publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Edson C. Tandoc, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Nanyang Technological University, records 187 publications - the 59th percentile of the discipline.
  • 59% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Edson C. Tandoc, and about 41% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Edson C. Tandoc ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Edson C. Tandoc D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edson C. Tandoc sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Edson C. Tandoc D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Edson C. Tandoc, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Nanyang Technological University, records 49 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Edson C. Tandoc, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Edson C. Tandoc ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Singapore Leader Award

Overview

Edson C. Tandoc is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, focusing on research within the social sciences. Their research predominantly spans sociology, political science, and communication, with additional contributions to gender studies, artificial intelligence, and social psychology.

Their main research topics include social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, media studies and communication, the impact of technology on adolescents, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, gender, feminism, and media, as well as public relations and crisis communication.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Edson C. Tandoc include Zhang Hao Goh, Seth Seet, Hye Kyung Kim, Langcheng Zhang, and Oscar Westlund.

Publication venues where Edson C. Tandoc has frequently contributed comprise Digital Journalism, Journalism Practice, Health Communication, Journalism, and New Media & Society.

Significant recent papers by Edson C. Tandoc are:

  • Man vs. Machine? The Impact of Algorithm Authorship on News Credibility, 2020, Digital Journalism
  • When viruses and misinformation spread: How young Singaporeans navigated uncertainty in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, 2020, New Media & Society
  • What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories, 2021, Media and Communication

These works address critical aspects of news credibility, the spread of misinformation during public health crises, and the characteristics of fake news.

Best Publications

  • Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions

    Edson Castro Tandoc;Zheng Wei Lim;Richard Ling

  • Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students

    Edson C. Tandoc;Patrick Ferrucci;Margaret Duffy

  • Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping

    Edson C. Tandoc

  • Communicating on Twitter during a disaster

    Bruno Takahashi;Edson C. Tandoc;Christine Carmichael

  • Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework:

    Edson C Tandoc;Richard Ling;Oscar Westlund;Andrew Duffy

  • THE JOURNALIST IS MARKETING THE NEWS

    Edson C. Tandoc;Tim P. Vos

  • The facts of fake news: A research review

    Edson C. Tandoc

  • The Audience-Oriented Editor: Making sense of the audience in the newsroom

    Raul Ferrer-Conill;Edson C. Tandoc

  • MIND THE GAP: Between journalistic role conception and role enactment

    Edson C. Tandoc;Lea Hellmueller;Tim P. Vos

  • When News Meets the Audience: How Audience Feedback Online Affects News Production and Consumption

    Eun-Ju Lee;Edson C. Tandoc

  • Fake News as a Critical Incident in Journalism

    Edson C. Tandoc;Joy Jenkins;Stephanie Craft

  • The Ethics of Web Analytics

    Edson C. Tandoc;Ryan J. Thomas

  • The hybridization of journalistic cultures : a comparative study of journalistic role performance

    Claudia Mellado;Lea Hellmueller;Mireya Márquez-Ramírez;Maria Luisa Humanes

  • Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science: Learning about how people learn about science

    Bruno Takahashi;Edson C. Tandoc

  • Comments, analytics, and social media: The impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation:

    Folker Hanusch;Edson C Tandoc

  • Science Literacy or Value Predisposition? A Meta-Analysis of Factors Predicting Public Perceptions of Benefits, Risks, and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy

    Shirley Soo Yee Ho;Alisius Deon Leong;Jiemin Looi;Liang Chen

  • The Buzzfeedication of journalism? How traditional news organizations are talking about a new entrant to the journalistic field will surprise you!:

    Edson Tandoc;Joy Michelle Jenkins

  • Why Web Analytics Click

    Edson C. Tandoc

  • The real you? The role of visual cues and comment congruence in perceptions of social attractiveness from facebook profiles.

    Seoyeon Hong;Edson C. Tandoc;Eunjin Anna Kim;Bokyung Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar Westlund
Oscar Westlund OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Claudia Mellado
Claudia Mellado Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso
Folker Hanusch
Folker Hanusch University of Vienna
May O. Lwin
May O. Lwin Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education in Social Sciences and Humanities has never been more accessible, with a range of degrees designed to suit different career goals and schedules. For those interested in human behavior, a master in psychology online is a popular pathway. This flexible option prepares graduates for roles in counseling, research, and organizational settings.

If you are seeking leadership or advanced teaching roles, consider one of the many online doctorate of education programs. These degrees are designed for those aiming for upper-level positions in academia or educational policy.

Fast-track degrees are also growing in demand. Many students favor 1 year masters programs to quickly build expertise and enter the workforce ahead of schedule. Similarly, a variety of accelerated online programs allow undergraduates to complete their bachelor's degrees at a faster pace, maximizing career opportunities in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Edson C. Tandoc

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles