World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Singapore
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
12185
World Ranking
2898
National Ranking
10

Edson C. Tandoc publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edson C. Tandoc sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 187 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Edson C. Tandoc D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edson C. Tandoc sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Singapore Leader Award

Overview

Edson C. Tandoc is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, focusing on research within the social sciences. Their research predominantly spans sociology, political science, and communication, with additional contributions to gender studies, artificial intelligence, and social psychology.

Their main research topics include social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, media studies and communication, the impact of technology on adolescents, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, gender, feminism, and media, as well as public relations and crisis communication.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Edson C. Tandoc include Zhang Hao Goh, Seth Seet, Hye Kyung Kim, Langcheng Zhang, and Oscar Westlund.

Publication venues where Edson C. Tandoc has frequently contributed comprise Digital Journalism, Journalism Practice, Health Communication, Journalism, and New Media & Society.

Significant recent papers by Edson C. Tandoc are:

  • Man vs. Machine? The Impact of Algorithm Authorship on News Credibility, 2020, Digital Journalism
  • When viruses and misinformation spread: How young Singaporeans navigated uncertainty in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, 2020, New Media & Society
  • What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories, 2021, Media and Communication

These works address critical aspects of news credibility, the spread of misinformation during public health crises, and the characteristics of fake news.

Best Publications

  • Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions

    Edson Castro Tandoc;Zheng Wei Lim;Richard Ling

  • Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students

    Edson C. Tandoc;Patrick Ferrucci;Margaret Duffy

  • Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping

    Edson C. Tandoc

  • Communicating on Twitter during a disaster

    Bruno Takahashi;Edson C. Tandoc;Christine Carmichael

  • Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework:

    Edson C Tandoc;Richard Ling;Oscar Westlund;Andrew Duffy

  • THE JOURNALIST IS MARKETING THE NEWS

    Edson C. Tandoc;Tim P. Vos

  • Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why:

    Edson C Tandoc;Darren Lim;Rich Ling

  • The facts of fake news: A research review

    Edson C. Tandoc

  • Too good to be true, too good not to share: the social utility of fake news

    Andrew Duffy;Edson Tandoc;Rich Ling

  • The Audience-Oriented Editor: Making sense of the audience in the newsroom

    Raul Ferrer-Conill;Edson C. Tandoc

  • MIND THE GAP: Between journalistic role conception and role enactment

    Edson C. Tandoc;Lea Hellmueller;Tim P. Vos

  • When News Meets the Audience: How Audience Feedback Online Affects News Production and Consumption

    Eun-Ju Lee;Edson C. Tandoc

  • Fake News as a Critical Incident in Journalism

    Edson C. Tandoc;Joy Jenkins;Stephanie Craft

  • The Ethics of Web Analytics

    Edson C. Tandoc;Ryan J. Thomas

  • The hybridization of journalistic cultures : a comparative study of journalistic role performance

    Claudia Mellado;Lea Hellmueller;Mireya Márquez-Ramírez;Maria Luisa Humanes

  • Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science: Learning about how people learn about science

    Bruno Takahashi;Edson C. Tandoc

  • Comments, analytics, and social media: The impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation:

    Folker Hanusch;Edson C Tandoc

  • Science Literacy or Value Predisposition? A Meta-Analysis of Factors Predicting Public Perceptions of Benefits, Risks, and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy

    Shirley Soo Yee Ho;Alisius Deon Leong;Jiemin Looi;Liang Chen

  • The Buzzfeedication of journalism? How traditional news organizations are talking about a new entrant to the journalistic field will surprise you!:

    Edson Tandoc;Joy Michelle Jenkins

  • Why Web Analytics Click

    Edson C. Tandoc

  • The real you? The role of visual cues and comment congruence in perceptions of social attractiveness from facebook profiles.

    Seoyeon Hong;Edson C. Tandoc;Eunjin Anna Kim;Bokyung Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar Westlund
Oscar Westlund OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Claudia Mellado
Claudia Mellado Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso
Folker Hanusch
Folker Hanusch University of Vienna
May O. Lwin
May O. Lwin Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education in Social Sciences and Humanities has never been more accessible, with a range of degrees designed to suit different career goals and schedules. For those interested in human behavior, a master in psychology online is a popular pathway. This flexible option prepares graduates for roles in counseling, research, and organizational settings.

If you are seeking leadership or advanced teaching roles, consider one of the many online doctorate of education programs. These degrees are designed for those aiming for upper-level positions in academia or educational policy.

Fast-track degrees are also growing in demand. Many students favor 1 year masters programs to quickly build expertise and enter the workforce ahead of schedule. Similarly, a variety of accelerated online programs allow undergraduates to complete their bachelor's degrees at a faster pace, maximizing career opportunities in a competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Edson C. Tandoc

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles