World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
20906
World Ranking
6289
National Ranking
50

Meeyoung Cha publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meeyoung Cha sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Meeyoung Cha D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meeyoung Cha sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Meeyoung Cha is affiliated with the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology in South Korea. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and social sciences, focusing on intersections of technology, society, and communication.

The primary fields of study for Meeyoung Cha include:

  • Computer Science
  • Social Sciences

The subfields of study further detail the expertise as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Safety Research

Key research topics covered by Meeyoung Cha consist of:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Topic Modeling
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Meeyoung Cha include:

  • "Emoticon Style: Interpreting Differences in Emoticons Across Cultures" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Perception Differences between the Depressed and Non-Depressed Users in Twitter" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Media Landscape in Twitter: A World of New Conventions and Political Diversity" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic" (2022), PLoS ONE
  • "The Potential of Chatbots for Emotional Support and Promoting Mental Well-Being in Different Cultures: Mixed Methods Study" (2023), Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Meeyoung Cha are:

  • Sungwon Han
  • Gabriel Lima
  • Sundong Kim
  • Jiyoung Han
  • Sungwon Park

The main publication venues where Meeyoung Cha's work appears repeatedly include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Journal of KIISE
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Best Publications

  • Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy

    Meeyoung Cha;Hamed Haddadi;Fabr´ıcio Benevenuto;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system

    Meeyoung Cha;Haewoon Kwak;Pablo Rodriguez;Yong-Yeol Ahn

  • On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook

    Bimal Viswanath;Alan Mislove;Meeyoung Cha;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Characterizing user behavior in online social networks

    Fabrício Benevenuto;Tiago Rodrigues;Meeyoung Cha;Virgílio Almeida

  • A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network

    Meeyoung Cha;Alan Mislove;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks

    Jing Ma;Wei Gao;Prasenjit Mitra;Sejeong Kwon

  • Prominent Features of Rumor Propagation in Online Social Media

    Sejeong Kwon;Meeyoung Cha;Kyomin Jung;Wei Chen

  • Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods

    Pollyanna Gonçalves;Matheus Araújo;Fabrício Benevenuto;Meeyoung Cha

  • Analyzing the video popularity characteristics of large-scale user generated content systems

    Meeyoung Cha;Haewoon Kwak;Pablo Rodriguez;Yong-Yeol Ahn

  • Rumor Detection over Varying Time Windows.

    Sejeong Kwon;Meeyoung Cha;Kyomin Jung

  • Watching television over an IP network

    Meeyoung Cha;Pablo Rodriguez;Jon Crowcroft;Sue Moon

  • Characterizing social cascades in flickr

    Meeyoung Cha;Alan Mislove;Ben Adams;Krishna P. Gummadi

  • Depressive Moods of Users Portrayed in Twitter

    Minsu Park;Chiyoung Cha;Meeyoung Cha

  • Emoticon Style: Interpreting Differences in Emoticons Across Cultures

    Jaram Park;Vladimir Barash;Clay Fink;Meeyoung Cha

  • The World of Connections and Information Flow in Twitter

    Meeyoung Cha;F. Benevenuto;H. Haddadi;K. Gummadi

  • Cross-Cultural Comparison of Nonverbal Cues in Emoticons on Twitter: Evidence from Big Data Analysis

    Jaram Park;Young Min Baek;Meeyoung Cha

  • Media landscape in Twitter: A world of new conventions and political diversity

    Jisun An;Meeyoung Cha;Krishna P. Gummadi;Jon Crowcroft

  • On word-of-mouth based discovery of the web

    Tiago Rodrigues;Fabrício Benevenuto;Meeyoung Cha;Krishna Gummadi

  • Perception Differences between the Depressed and Non-Depressed Users in Twitter

    Minsu Park;David W. McDonald;Meeyoung Cha

  • On next-generation telco-managed P2P TV architectures

    Meeyoung Cha;Pablo Rodriguez;Sue Moon;Jon Crowcroft

  • Characterizing user navigation and interactions in online social networks

    Fabrício Benevenuto;Tiago Rodrigues;Meeyoung Cha;Virgílio Almeida

Frequent Co-Authors

Krishna P. Gummadi
Krishna P. Gummadi Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Sue Moon
Sue Moon Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Fabrício Benevenuto
Fabrício Benevenuto Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Jon Crowcroft
Jon Crowcroft University of Cambridge
Virgilio Almeida
Virgilio Almeida Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Haewoon Kwak
Haewoon Kwak Indiana University
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Daniele Quercia
Daniele Quercia Nokia Bell Labs
Yong-Yeol Ahn
Yong-Yeol Ahn Indiana University
Yong Li
Yong Li Tsinghua University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of related online degrees that further enhance your skills and career prospects. Many students find that pursuing advanced education online offers both flexibility and affordability.

For professionals seeking leadership roles in business, executive mba programs online are a popular option. These programs help students develop management and strategy skills tailored for today’s tech-driven industries.

Those interested in data, information systems, or digital libraries should consider a master in library science. This credential is valuable for careers in information management, data curation, and digital archiving.

Cost can be a concern for many students. Fortunately, there is a diverse range of least expensive online masters that provide high-quality education without breaking the bank.

Ambitious professionals aiming for upper-level management in tech organizations may consider a doctorate in organizational leadership online. This path prepares graduates for executive roles and leadership positions across many industries.

Best Scientists Citing Meeyoung Cha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles