World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Felicia Marie Knaul

Felicia Marie Knaul

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1731 1553 832 735 248 18328

Felicia Marie Knaul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Felicia Marie Knaul between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Felicia Marie Knaul published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2015. 30 of the 305 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2015. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 16 publications
1996 2025

305 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Felicia Marie Knaul: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 13
2001 3
2002 7
2003 9
2004 2
2005 7
2006 14
2007 11
2008 5
2009 16
2010 6
2011 14
2012 13
2013 13
2014 10
2015 23
2016 12
2017 12
2018 15
2019 5
2020 11
2021 20
2022 10
2023 14
2024 14
2025 16
Total 305
Download as CSV

Felicia Marie Knaul publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felicia Marie Knaul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 248 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 248
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Felicia Marie Knaul D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felicia Marie Knaul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Felicia Marie Knaul is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, economics and econometrics, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, and health.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Frequent co-authors of Felicia Marie Knaul include Héctor Arreola-Ornelas, Afsan Bhadelia, William E. Rosa, Michael Touchton, and Lukas Radbruch.

Their publications often appear in several key venues, with the most frequent being:

  • The Lancet
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
  • The Lancet Global Health
  • The Lancet Public Health

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Redefining Palliative Care-A New Consensus-Based Definition" (2020), published in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • "Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic - Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021), published in Journal of Criminal Justice
  • "The key role of palliative care in response to the COVID-19 tsunami of suffering" (2020), published in The Lancet
  • "The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission" (2024), published in The Lancet
  • "Punt Politics as Failure of Health System Stewardship: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic Response in Brazil and Mexico" (2021), published in The Lancet Regional Health - Americas

Best Publications

  • Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report

    Felicia Marie Knaul;Paul E Farmer;Eric L Krakauer;Eric L Krakauer;Liliana De Lima

  • Expanding global access to radiotherapy

    Rifat Atun;David A Jaffray;David A Jaffray;David A Jaffray;Michael B Barton;Freddie Bray

  • Redefining Palliative Care—A New Consensus-Based Definition

    Lukas Radbruch;Liliana De Lima;Felicia Knaul;Roberto Wenk

  • Expansion of cancer care and control in countries of low and middle income: a call to action.

    Paul Farmer;Julio Frenk;Felicia M Knaul;Lawrence N Shulman

  • Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America

    Rifat Atun;Luiz Odorico Monteiro De Andrade;Luiz Odorico Monteiro De Andrade;Gisele Almeida;Daniel Cotlear

  • The quest for universal health coverage: achieving social protection for all in Mexico

    Felicia Marie Knaul;Eduardo González-Pier;Octavio Gómez-Dantés;David García-Junco

  • Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic - Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Alex R. Piquero;Alex R. Piquero;Wesley G. Jennings;Erin Jemison;Catherine Kaukinen

  • Planning cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean

    Paul E. Goss;Brittany L. Lee;Brittany L. Lee;Tanja Badovinac-Crnjevic;Kathrin Strasser-Weippl

  • Sistema de salud de México

    Octavio Gómez Dantés;Sergio Sesma;Victor M. Becerril;Felicia M. Knaul

  • Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico

    Julio Frenk;Eduardo González-Pier;Octavio Gómez-Dantés;Miguel A Lezana

  • Women and Health: the key for sustainable development

    Ana Langer;Afaf Meleis;Felicia M Knaul;Rifat Atun

  • Evidence is good for your health system: policy reform to remedy catastrophic and impoverishing health spending in Mexico.

    Felicia Marie Knaul;Héctor Arreola-Ornelas;Oscar Méndez-Carniado;Chloe Bryson-Cahn

  • Improving responsiveness of health systems to non-communicable diseases

    Rifat Atun;Shabbar Jaffar;Sania Nishtar;Felicia M Knaul

  • Health insurance in Mexico: achieving universal coverage through structural reform.

    Felicia Marie Knaul;Julio Frenk

  • Financial Crisis, Health Outcomes, and Aging: Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s

    David M Cutler;Felicia Knaul;Rafael Lozano;Oscar Méndez

  • A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

    Unknown

  • Youth Education and Work in Mexico

    Deborah Levison;Karine S Moe;Felicia Marie Knaul

  • Overcoming social segregation in health care in Latin America

    Daniel Cotlear;Octavio Gómez-Dantés;Felicia Knaul;Rifat Atun

  • A standard set of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) initiative

    Wee Loon Ong;Wee Loon Ong;Maartje G. Schouwenburg;Annelotte C.M. Van Bommel;Caleb Stowell

  • Costs, affordability, and feasibility of an essential package of cancer control interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition.

    Hellen Gelband;Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan;Cindy L Gauvreau;Susan Horton

  • Evidence-based health policy: three generations of reform in Mexico.

    Julio Frenk;Jaime Sepúlveda;Octavio Gómez-Dantés;Felicia Knaul

Frequent Co-Authors

Julio Frenk
Julio Frenk University of California, Los Angeles
Rifat Atun
Rifat Atun Harvard University
Rafael Lozano
Rafael Lozano University of Washington
David A. Jaffray
David A. Jaffray The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Dean T. Jamison
Dean T. Jamison University of California, San Francisco
Lawrence N. Shulman
Lawrence N. Shulman University of Pennsylvania
Julie R. Gralow
Julie R. Gralow American Society of Clinical Oncology
Lukas Radbruch
Lukas Radbruch University Hospital Bonn
Paul Farmer
Paul Farmer Harvard University
Mary K. Gospodarowicz
Mary K. Gospodarowicz Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers a range of flexible online degree options to help fit your career goals and lifestyle. Many students choose to pursue a online master degree in psychology, which can open doors to roles in counseling, human resources, and research.

For those interested in education leadership, accelerated edd programs provide a fast-track route to advanced credentials, allowing you to enter high-level academic or administrative careers quickly. Accelerated formats can help you progress faster, but they also require strong time management skills.

Exploring a master degree online can offer both flexibility and depth, allowing you to upskill or switch focus in just one year. For undergraduates seeking speed and convenience, there are also online accelerated programs that condense several years of study into a shorter timeframe.

Each pathway presents unique benefits and challenges. Consider your schedule, learning style, and professional goals when choosing an online program to ensure success in the evolving fields of social science and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Felicia Marie Knaul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles