World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stéphane Verguet

Stéphane Verguet

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4280 3953 2042 1851 182 13863

Stéphane Verguet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stéphane Verguet between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stéphane Verguet published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 12.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2017. 21 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2017. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications
2010 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stéphane Verguet: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 12
2014 6
2015 17
2016 19
2017 29
2018 14
2019 18
2020 20
2021 14
2022 16
2023 11
2024 9
2025 12
Total 203
Download as CSV

Stéphane Verguet publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stéphane Verguet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 182 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 182
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Stéphane Verguet D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stéphane Verguet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Stéphane Verguet is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within Medicine and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. The subfields in which they have published extensively include General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Finance, and Health.

Their work addresses a range of topics related to global and health economic issues. Key areas of focus include:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Stéphane Verguet has contributed to several frequently published venues. These include:

  • BMJ Global Health
  • Value in Health
  • Health Policy and Planning
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Quantifying the global burden of mental disorders and their economic value," 2022, published in EClinicalMedicine
  • "Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 to 2030: a modelling study," 2021, published in The Lancet
  • "The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion," 2020, published in The Lancet
  • "Toward universal health coverage in the post-COVID-19 era," 2021, published in Nature Medicine
  • "Protecting essential health services in low-income and middle-income countries and humanitarian settings while responding to the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, published in BMJ Global Health

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Solomon Tessema Memirie
  • Sarah Bolongaita
  • Ole Frithjof Norheim
  • Mieraf Taddesse Tolla
  • Ryoko Sato

Best Publications

  • Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.

    John G Meara;John G Meara;Andrew J M Leather;Lars E Hagander;Blake C Alkire

  • Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report

    Felicia Marie Knaul;Paul E Farmer;Eric L Krakauer;Eric L Krakauer;Liliana De Lima

  • Quantifying the global burden of mental disorders and their economic value

    Unknown

  • Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010–30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN Sustainable Development Goal for health

    Ole Frithjof Norheim;Prabhat Jha;Kesetebirhan Admasu;Tore Godal

  • Quality of basic maternal care functions in health facilities of five African countries: an analysis of national health system surveys

    Margaret E Kruk;Hannah H Leslie;Stéphane Verguet;Godfrey M Mbaruku

  • Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Address Health Equity Concerns

    Richard Cookson;Andrew J. Mirelman;Susan Griffin;Miqdad Asaria

  • The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion

    Gene Bukhman;Ana O Mocumbi;Rifat Atun;Anne E Becker

  • Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 to 2030: a modelling study.

    Xiang Li;Christinah Mukandavire;Zulma M Cucunubá;Susy Echeverria Londono

  • Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health Policy Assessment: A Tutorial

    Stéphane Verguet;Jane J. Kim;Dean T. Jamison;Dean T. Jamison

  • Estimates of Cancer Incidence in Ethiopia in 2015 Using Population-Based Registry Data.

    Solomon Tessema Memirie;Mahlet Kifle Habtemariam;Mathewos Asefa;Biniyam Tefera Deressa

  • Universal Public Finance of Tuberculosis Treatment in India: An Extended Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis

    Stéphane Verguet;Ramanan Laxminarayan;Ramanan Laxminarayan;Ramanan Laxminarayan;Dean T. Jamison

  • Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.

    John G. Meara;John G. Meara;Andrew J M Leather;Lars Hagander;Blake C. Alkire

  • Cardiovascular, respiratory, and related disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition.

    Dorairaj Prabhakaran;Shuchi Anand;D. A. Watkins;Thomas A. Gaziano

  • Universal health coverage and intersectoral action for health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition

    Dean T. Jamison;Ala Alwan;Charles N. Mock;Rachel Nugent

  • The consequences of tobacco tax on household health and finances in rich and poor smokers in China:an extended cost-effectiveness analysis

    Stéphane Verguet;Cindy L Gauvreau;Sujata Mishra;Mary MacLennan

  • Public Finance Of Rotavirus Vaccination In India And Ethiopia: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

    Stéphane Verguet;Shane Murphy;Benjamin Anderson;Kjell Arne Johansson

  • Health gains and financial risk protection afforded by public financing of selected interventions in Ethiopia: An extended cost-effectiveness analysis

    Stéphane Verguet;Zachary D Olson;Joseph B Babigumira;Dawit Desalegn

  • Universal Health Coverage and Essential Packages of Care

    David A Watkins;Dean T Jamison;Anne Mills;Rifat Atun

  • Controlling measles using supplemental immunization activities: a mathematical model to inform optimal policy.

    Stéphane Verguet;Mira Johri;Shaun K. Morris;Cindy L. Gauvreau

  • Cost-effectiveness and resource implications of aggressive action on tuberculosis in China, India, and South Africa: a combined analysis of nine models.

    Nicolas A. Menzies;Gabriela B. Gomez;Gabriela B. Gomez;Fiammetta Bozzani;Susmita Chatterjee

  • Estimates of case-fatality ratios of measles in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and modelling analysis.

    Allison Portnoy;Mark Jit;Mark Jit;Matthew Ferrari;Matthew Hanson

  • Global Problems, Smart Solutions: Chronic Disease

    Prabhat Jha;Rachel Nugent;Stéphane Verguet;David Bloom

Frequent Co-Authors

Ole Frithjof Norheim
Ole Frithjof Norheim University of Bergen
Dean T. Jamison
Dean T. Jamison University of California, San Francisco
Mark Jit
Mark Jit New York University
Margaret E. Kruk
Margaret E. Kruk Washington University in St. Louis
Prabhat Jha
Prabhat Jha University of Toronto
Atul A. Gawande
Atul A. Gawande Brigham and Women's Hospital
Donald A.P. Bundy
Donald A.P. Bundy London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Rifat Atun
Rifat Atun Harvard University
Paul Farmer
Paul Farmer Harvard University
Joshua A. Salomon
Joshua A. Salomon Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand grows for professionals in social sciences and humanities, many students are turning to online programs to advance their education and career options. Pursuing accredited degrees online can offer both flexibility and affordability, especially for those balancing work and family commitments.

If you’re interested in counseling, earning a degree from one of the cacrep accredited counseling programs is an excellent starting point. These programs help prepare graduates for licensure and clinical practice. Those passionate about supporting families may also consider marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by professional organizations, which pave the way for rewarding careers in therapy and relationship counseling.

For students looking to enter broader behavioral health fields, there are a number of cheap online psychology degree options, making education in this field more accessible than ever. Additionally, social work is a popular choice for those committed to social justice and community outreach. The easiest msw online program options enable future social workers to start their careers without unnecessary barriers to entry.

These online degrees make it easier to pursue a range of career pathways, from clinical counseling and therapy to social services, advocacy, and research within the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Stéphane Verguet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles