World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anthony O. Gramolini

Anthony O. Gramolini

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
9794
World Ranking
17571
National Ranking
610

Anthony O. Gramolini publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony O. Gramolini sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 174 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Anthony O. Gramolini D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony O. Gramolini sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony O. Gramolini is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work covers several specialized subfields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, surgery, biomedical engineering, and biomaterials. Gramolini's research topics include cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, cardiac fibrosis and remodeling, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, cardiovascular effects of exercise, cardiovascular function and risk factors, and electrospun nanofibers in biomedical applications.

Gramolini has contributed to numerous recent papers, demonstrating active engagement with current scientific challenges in cardiac health. Some of these publications include:

  • "Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality" (2020, ESC Heart Failure)
  • "Machine Learning Compared With Conventional Statistical Models for Predicting Myocardial Infarction Readmission and Mortality: A Systematic Review" (2021, Canadian Journal of Cardiology)
  • "Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 (IGFBP7) links senescence to heart failure" (2022, Nature Cardiovascular Research)
  • "REEP5 depletion causes sarco-endoplasmic reticulum vacuolization and cardiac functional defects" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "An organ-on-a-chip model for pre-clinical drug evaluation in progressive non-genetic cardiomyopathy" (2021, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology)

The venues where Gramolini frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology Plus
  • Circulation Research
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation

Frequent collaborators in their scientific work comprise:

  • Uroš Kuzmanov
  • Allen C. T. Teng
  • Cristine J. Reitz
  • Meghan J. McFadden
  • Filio Billia

Gramolini's academic production is grounded in extensive expertise within these areas, supported by a well-established network of co-authors and publication venues. Their publication record reflects a sustained effort in exploring the molecular and clinical aspects of cardiovascular disease, particularly focused on cardiac function, remodeling, and novel methods such as machine learning applied to cardiac readmission and mortality prediction.

Best Publications

  • Ankyrin-B mutation causes type 4 long-QT cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death

    Peter J. Mohler;Jean-Jacques Schott;Anthony O. Gramolini;Keith W. Dilly

  • SIRPA is a specific cell-surface marker for isolating cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells

    Nicole C Dubois;April M Craft;Parveen Sharma;David A Elliott

  • Global survey of organ and organelle protein expression in mouse: combined proteomic and transcriptomic profiling.

    Thomas Kislinger;Brian Cox;Anitha Kannan;Clement Chung

  • Human phospholamban null results in lethal dilated cardiomyopathy revealing a critical difference between mouse and human

    Kobra Haghighi;Fotis Kolokathis;Luke Pater;Roy A. Lynch

  • A mutation in the human phospholamban gene, deleting arginine 14, results in lethal, hereditary cardiomyopathy

    Kobra Haghighi;Fotis Kolokathis;Anthony O. Gramolini;Jason R. Waggoner

  • Self-renewing resident arterial macrophages arise from embryonic CX3CR1 + precursors and circulating monocytes immediately after birth

    Sherine Ensan;Angela Li;Rickvinder Besla;Norbert Degousee

  • Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT): Technical overview of a profiling method optimized for the comprehensive proteomic investigation of normal and diseased heart tissue

    Thomas Kislinger;Anthony O. Gramolini;David H. MacLennan;Andrew Emili

  • Proteome Dynamics during C2C12 Myoblast Differentiation

    Thomas Kislinger;Anthony O. Gramolini;Yan Pan;Khaled Rahman

  • Cardiovascular proteomics: tools to develop novel biomarkers and potential applications.

    Sara Arab;Anthony O. Gramolini;Anthony O. Gramolini;Peipei Ping;Thomas Kislinger

  • The ankyrin-B C-terminal domain determines activity of ankyrin-B/G chimeras in rescue of abnormal inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and ryanodine receptor distribution in ankyrin-B (-/-) neonatal cardiomyocytes.

    Peter J. Mohler;Anthony O. Gramolini;Vann Bennett

  • Induction of utrophin gene expression by heregulin in skeletal muscle cells: Role of the N-box motif and GA binding protein

    Anthony O. Gramolini;Lindsay M. Angus;Laurent Schaeffer;Edward A. Burton

  • Cell-Surface Proteomics Identifies Lineage-Specific Markers of Embryo-Derived Stem Cells

    Peter J. Rugg-Gunn;Brian J. Cox;Fredrik Lanner;Parveen Sharma

  • Cardiac-specific overexpression of sarcolipin inhibits sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA2a) activity and impairs cardiac function in mice

    Michio Asahi;Kinya Otsu;Hiroyuki Nakayama;Shungo Hikoso

  • Genes, proteins and complexes: the multifaceted nature of FHL family proteins in diverse tissues.

    Thiruchelvi Shathasivam;Thomas Kislinger;Thomas Kislinger;Anthony O. Gramolini

  • Cardiac-specific elevations in thyroid hormone enhance contractility and prevent pressure overload-induced cardiac dysfunction

    Maria Giovanna Trivieri;Gavin Y. Oudit;Rajan Sah;Benoit Gilles Kerfant

  • Comparative Proteomics Profiling of a Phospholamban Mutant Mouse Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Reveals Progressive Intracellular Stress Responses

    Anthony O. Gramolini;Thomas Kislinger;Rasoul Alikhani-Koopaei;Vincent Fong

  • Targeted proteomics identifies liquid-biopsy signatures for extracapsular prostate cancer

    Yunee Kim;Jouhyun Jeon;Salvador Mejia;Cindy Q Yao;Cindy Q Yao

  • Local Transcriptional Control of Utrophin Expression at the Neuromuscular Synapse

    Anthony O. Gramolini;Carina L. Dennis;Jonathon M. Tinsley;George S. Robertson

  • Cathepsin-L ameliorates cardiac hypertrophy through activation of the autophagy-lysosomal dependent protein processing pathways.

    Mei Sun;Maral Ouzounian;Geoffrey de Couto;Manyin Chen

  • Increased expression of utrophin in a slow vs. a fast muscle involves posttranscriptional events

    Anthony O. Gramolini;Guy Bélanger;Jennifer M. Thompson;Joe V. Chakkalakal

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Kislinger
Thomas Kislinger University of Toronto
David H. MacLennan
David H. MacLennan University of Toronto
Andrew Emili
Andrew Emili Boston University
Peter H. Backx
Peter H. Backx York University
Bernard J. Jasmin
Bernard J. Jasmin University of Ottawa
Peter Liu
Peter Liu University of Ottawa
Douglas S. Lee
Douglas S. Lee University Health Network
Gavin Y. Oudit
Gavin Y. Oudit University of Alberta
Kay E. Davies
Kay E. Davies University of Oxford
Hongbo Guo
Hongbo Guo Beihang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates in Biology and Biochemistry can explore a variety of online degrees and career opportunities in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. One popular path is medical billing and coding, which offers flexible work options and strong job demand. If you’re interested in earning a competitive certified medical coder salary, this could be a great fit. It’s important to research if is medical coding a good career for your long-term goals, as this profession offers both benefits and unique challenges.

For those who wish to manage health data, a health information management online degree can open doors to administrative roles that blend healthcare and technology. Alternatively, you might deepen your expertise with an online nutrition masters for careers in wellness, public health, or clinical nutrition. These programs offer flexible learning, making them ideal for busy students or professionals looking to advance their education and careers in healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony O. Gramolini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles