World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
102
Citations
42663
World Ranking
78
National Ranking
41

Max H. Bazerman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max H. Bazerman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 357 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Max H. Bazerman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max H. Bazerman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Max H. Bazerman is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, focusing on decision sciences, psychology, economics, and management.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Their research covers various subfields such as:

  • Applied Psychology
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Max H. Bazerman has collaborated frequently with the following co-authors:

  • Don A. Moore
  • Ariella Kristal
  • Ashley V. Whillans
  • Joshua D. Greene

Some of their recent publications include:

  • Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science, 2021, Nature
  • Signing at the beginning versus at the end does not decrease dishonesty, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Veil-of-ignorance reasoning mitigates self-serving bias in resource allocation during the COVID-19 crisis, 2021, Judgment and Decision Making
  • Leadership & overconfidence, 2022, Behavioral Science & Policy
  • Contents, 2022, Yale University Press eBooks

Publications appear in venues such as:

  • Nature
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Behavioral Science & Policy
  • Yale University Press eBooks

Their book publications include works released by prestigious academic presses. Titles include:

  • Complicit, published twice in 2022 by Princeton University Press
  • Decision Leadership, published twice in 2022 by Yale University Press
  • The Power of Experiments, published in 2020 by The MIT Press

Among the recognitions received, Max H. Bazerman has been named Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Judgment in Managerial Decision Making

    Max H. Bazerman

  • Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts

    George F. Loewenstein;Leigh Thompson;Max H. Bazerman

  • Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis.

    Christopher K. Hsee;George F. Loewenstein;Sally Blount;Max H. Bazerman

  • Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation

    Margaret Ann Neale;Max H. Bazerman

  • Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting

    Lisa D. Ordóñez;Maurice E. Schweitzer;Adam D. Galinsky;Max H. Bazerman

  • Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What's Right and What to Do about It

    Max H. Bazerman;Ann E. Tenbrunsel

  • Conflicts Of Interest And The Case Of Auditor Independence: Moral Seduction And Strategic Issue Cycling

    Don A. Moore;Philip E. Tetlock;Lloyd Tanlu;Max H. Bazerman

  • BLIND SPOTS IN INDUSTRY AND COMPETITOR ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS OF INTERFIRM (MIS)PERCEPTIONS FOR STRATEGIC DECISIONS

    Edward J. Zajac;Max H. Bazerman

  • The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes

    Margaret A. Neale;Max H. Bazerman

  • Dishonest Deed, Clear Conscience: When Cheating Leads to Moral Disengagement and Motivated Forgetting

    Lisa L. Shu;Francesca Gino;Max H. Bazerman

  • Why good accountants do bad audits.

    Max H Bazerman;George Loewenstein;Don A Moore

  • negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences

    Max H. Bazerman;Ann E. Tenbrunsel;Kimberly Wade-Benzoni

  • Integrative bargaining in a competitive market

    Max H Bazerman;Thomas Magliozzi;Margaret A Neale

  • The Impossibility of Auditor Independence

    Max H. Bazerman;Kimberly P. Morgan;George Loewenstein

  • Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end

    Lisa L. Shu;Nina Mazar;Francesca Gino;Dan Ariely

  • Predictable surprises : the disasters you should have seen coming, and how to prevent them

    Max H. Bazerman;Michael Watkins

  • When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction.

    Nicholas Epley;Eugene M. Caruso;Max H. Bazerman

  • Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest

    Dolly Chugh;Max H. Bazerman;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution

    Max H. Bazerman;Margaret A. Neale

  • Predictable Surprises

    Max H. Bazerman;Michael D. Watkins

  • Negotiating in Organizations

    Max H. Bazerman;Roy J. Lewicki

  • The Construction of Preference: Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review And Theoretical Analysis

    Christopher K. Hsee;George Loewenstein;Sally Blount;Max H. Bazerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesca Gino
Francesca Gino Harvard University
Margaret A. Neale
Margaret A. Neale Stanford University
Don A. Moore
Don A. Moore University of California, Berkeley
Leigh Thompson
Leigh Thompson Northwestern University
George Loewenstein
George Loewenstein Carnegie Mellon University
Henry S. Farber
Henry S. Farber Princeton University
Andrew J. Hoffman
Andrew J. Hoffman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David M. Messick
David M. Messick Northwestern University
Nicholas Epley
Nicholas Epley University of Chicago
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Social Sciences and Humanities, online degrees open doors to flexible, affordable, and accessible education. Choosing the right program often depends on professional goals, cost, and program structure.

If you are interested in psychology, learning about psychology degree cost can help you find an affordable path to careers in counseling, therapy, or research.

Those looking to make a direct impact through social work may consider an online MSW program. These allow graduates to work in community health, public policy, and family services.

For working professionals, a part time psyd program offers the flexibility to advance clinical psychology skills without putting your job on hold.

If your ambition lies in helping couples and families, consider completing your education through one of the mft degree programs available online. This qualification can quickly pave the way to a rewarding practice in marriage and family therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Max H. Bazerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles