World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
37879
World Ranking
2419
National Ranking
1402

Dale T. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale T. Miller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dale T. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale T. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Donald T. Campbell Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology

Overview

Dale T. Miller is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the Social Sciences, with focused contributions in Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Education, Applied Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including Social and Intergroup Psychology, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, African cultural and philosophical studies, Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Ethics in Business and Education.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Dale T. Miller are:

  • A Century of Pluralistic Ignorance: What We Have Learned About Its Origins, Forms, and Consequences (2023, Frontiers in Social Psychology)
  • From Whom Do We Learn Group Norms? Low-Ranking Group Members Are Perceived as the Best Sources (2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes)
  • A Dynamic Perspective on Moral Choice: Revisiting Moral Hypocrisy (2021, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes)
  • Psychology of Personal Political Engagement in Russia: Unpacking Perceived Community Culture, Pluralistic Ignorance, and System Justification (2024, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology)

The venues most frequently publishing their work include Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Frontiers in Social Psychology, and Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Jennifer Dannals, Emily Reit, Stephanie Lin, Albina Gallyamova, and Deborah A. Prentice.

Dale T. Miller received the Donald T. Campbell Award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives

    Daniel Kahneman;Dale T. Miller

  • Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?

    Dale T. Miller;Michael Ross

  • Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.

    Melvin J. Lerner;Dale T. Miller

  • Rediscovering Social Innovation

    James A. Phills;Kriss Deiglmeier;Dale T. Miller

  • Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.

    Benoît Monin;Dale T. Miller

  • When small effects are impressive

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • Disrespect and the experience of injustice.

    Dale T. Miller

  • The norm of self-interest.

    Dale T. Miller

  • Expectancies and interpersonal processes.

    Dale T. Miller;William Turnbull

  • Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller;Jenifer R. Lightdale

  • Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity.

    Dale T. Miller;Cathy McFarland

  • Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure.

    Dale T. Miller

  • Changing Norms to Change Behavior

    Dale T. Miller;Deborah A. Prentice

  • The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest.

    Dale T. Miller;Rebecca K. Ratner

  • Deserving and the Emergence of Forms of Justice1

    Melvin J. Lerner;Dale T. Miller;John G. Holmes

  • Pluralistic Ignorance and the Perpetuation of Social Norms by Unwitting Actors

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions.

    Dale T. Miller;Daniel A. Effron

  • The construction of social norms and standards.

    Dale T. Miller;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah A. Prentice
Deborah A. Prentice Princeton University
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University
Benoît Monin
Benoît Monin Stanford University
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Michael Ross
Michael Ross University of Waterloo
A.B. Cohen
A.B. Cohen Arizona State University
John G. Holmes
John G. Holmes University of Waterloo
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Sanjay K. Srivastava
Sanjay K. Srivastava Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Melvin J. Lerner
Melvin J. Lerner University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up diverse career pathways, particularly in education and counseling. Many students consider becoming school counselors due to high demand across the United States. However, certification requirements and pathways vary by state, so it's important to research the specific steps involved in the region where you plan to work.

For example, prospective counselors should familiarize themselves with the North Dakota school counselor certification requirements if they aim to practice in North Dakota. Similarly, understanding how to become a school counselor in Ohio and meeting those state-specific standards is essential for Ohio residents.

If you are considering Oklahoma, check out the requirements to be a school counselor in Oklahoma. For those interested in the West Coast, learning about the Oregon school counselor certification requirements will clarify the necessary qualifications.

Reviewing these resources can help you choose the right online degree and understand the credentials needed for your desired career in counseling or psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Dale T. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles