World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
9146
World Ranking
6193
National Ranking
2778

Florian Schaub publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florian Schaub sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Florian Schaub D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florian Schaub sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Florian Schaub is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans across the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with a notable focus on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Psychology, and Human-Computer Interaction.

The main topics in Schaub's work include:

  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Media and Politics

Key recent papers authored by Schaub are:

  • "Follow My Recommendations: A Personalized Privacy Assistant for Mobile App Permissions" (2020), published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for All" (2022), published in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Expecting the Unexpected: Understanding Mismatched Privacy Expectations Online" (2020), published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "An Empirical Analysis of Data Deletion and Opt-Out Choices on 150 Websites" (2020), published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "Disparities in Students' Propensity to Consent to Learning Analytics" (2021), published in International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Frequently publishing venues include:

  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Florian Schaub has collaborated repeatedly with several researchers, including:

  • Yixin Zou
  • Alessandro Acquisti
  • Norman Sadeh
  • Kaiwen Sun
  • Abraham Mhaidli

Best Publications

  • Alexa, Are You Listening?: Privacy Perceptions, Concerns and Privacy-seeking Behaviors with Smart Speakers

    Josephine Lau;Benjamin Zimmerman;Florian Schaub

  • Nudges for Privacy and Security: Understanding and Assisting Users’ Choices Online

    Alessandro Acquisti;Idris Adjerid;Rebecca Balebako;Laura Brandimarte

  • Pseudonym Schemes in Vehicular Networks: A Survey

    Jonathan Petit;Florian Schaub;Michael Feiri;Frank Kargl

  • Your Location has been Shared 5,398 Times!: A Field Study on Mobile App Privacy Nudging

    Hazim Almuhimedi;Florian Schaub;Norman Sadeh;Idris Adjerid

  • (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the Field

    Christine Utz;Martin Degeling;Sascha Fahl;Florian Schaub

  • A design space for effective privacy notices

    Florian Schaub;Rebecca Balebako;Adam L. Durity;Lorrie Faith Cranor

  • We Value Your Privacy... Now Take Some Cookies: Measuring the GDPR’s Impact on Web Privacy

    Martin Degeling;Christine Utz;Christopher Lentzsch;Henry Hosseini

  • Disagreeable Privacy Policies: Mismatches between Meaning and Users’ Understanding

    Joel R. Reidenberg;Travis Breaux;Lorrie Faith Cranor;Brian French

  • The Creation and Analysis of a Website Privacy Policy Corpus

    Shomir Wilson;Florian Schaub;Aswarth Abhilash Dara;Frederick Liu

  • Polisis: Automated Analysis and Presentation of Privacy Policies Using Deep Learning

    Hamza Harkous;Kassem Fawaz;Rémi Lebret;Florian Schaub

  • Password entry usability and shoulder surfing susceptibility on different smartphone platforms

    Florian Schaub;Ruben Deyhle;Michael Weber

  • Follow My Recommendations: A Personalized Privacy Assistant for Mobile App Permissions.

    Bin Liu;Mads Schaarup Andersen;Florian Schaub;Hazim Almuhimedi

  • Automated analysis of privacy requirements for mobile apps

    Sebastian Zimmeck;Ziqi Wang;Lieyong Zou;Roger Iyengar

  • A VANET-based emergency vehicle warning system

    Andreas Buchenscheit;Florian Schaub;Frank Kargl;Michael Weber

  • Designing Effective Privacy Notices and Controls

    Florian Schaub;Rebecca Balebako;Lorrie Faith Cranor

  • Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for All

    Unknown

  • Privacy Requirements in Vehicular Communication Systems

    Florian Schaub;Zhendong Ma;Frank Kargl

  • PrivOnto: A semantic framework for the analysis of privacy policies

    Alessandro Oltramari;Dhivya Piraviperumal;Florian Schaub;Shomir Wilson

  • Exploring the design space of graphical passwords on smartphones

    Florian Schaub;Marcel Walch;Bastian Könings;Michael Weber

  • Crowdsourcing Annotations for Websites' Privacy Policies: Can It Really Work?

    Shomir Wilson;Florian Schaub;Rohan Ramanath;Norman Sadeh

  • Privacy and Security Threat Models and Mitigation Strategies of Older Adults

    Alisa Frik;Leysan Nurgalieva;Julia Bernd;Joyce Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Weber
Michael Weber University of Ulm
Norman Sadeh
Norman Sadeh Carnegie Mellon University
Lorrie Faith Cranor
Lorrie Faith Cranor Carnegie Mellon University
Frank Kargl
Frank Kargl University of Ulm
Alessandro Acquisti
Alessandro Acquisti Carnegie Mellon University
Enrico Rukzio
Enrico Rukzio University of Ulm
Thorsten Holz
Thorsten Holz Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy
Travis D. Breaux
Travis D. Breaux Carnegie Mellon University
Yuvraj Agarwal
Yuvraj Agarwal Carnegie Mellon University
Noah A. Smith
Noah A. Smith University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As demand for technology professionals continues to rise, students interested in Computer Science can explore a wide range of quickest degree to get online options. These accelerated programs allow you to fast-track your education while preparing for high-paying roles in the tech sector.

For those drawn to cutting-edge fields, many universities now offer specialized ai online degree programs. These degrees focus on machine learning, robotics, and data science, which are among the fastest-growing areas in STEM.

Choosing the best degree to get can shape your future career success and earning potential. For many, Computer Science remains a top choice due to its versatility and abundant job opportunities.

Those seeking post-graduate advancement or a career change may consider an easiest masters degree to get online. These programs provide flexibility while enhancing your credentials—opening pathways to roles in research, academia, or specialized tech fields.

Best Scientists Citing Florian Schaub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles