World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bart P. Knijnenburg

Bart P. Knijnenburg

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5150
World Ranking
12609
National Ranking
5108

Bart P. Knijnenburg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart P. Knijnenburg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bart P. Knijnenburg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart P. Knijnenburg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bart P. Knijnenburg is affiliated with Clemson University in the United States. Their research spans across multiple domains, primarily focusing on social sciences and computer science, with significant contributions to sociology, political science, artificial intelligence, social psychology, and information systems.

Their work explores a variety of topics, including:

  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media

Knijnenburg has published research extensively in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators include Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Kaileigh A. Byrne, Daricia Wilkinson, Nathan J. McNeese, and Christopher Flathmann.

Selected recent papers by Knijnenburg include:

  • Examining Rural and Racial Disparities in the Relationship Between Loneliness and Social Technology Use Among Older Adults, 2021, Frontiers in Public Health
  • Why or Why Not? The Effect of Justification Styles on Chatbot Recommendations, 2021, ACM Transactions on Information Systems
  • Emotional and Practical Considerations Towards the Adoption and Abandonment of VPNs as a Privacy-Enhancing Technology, 2020, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Don't Disturb My Circles! Boundary Preservation Is at the Center of Location-Sharing Concerns, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Predicting Privacy Behavior on Online Social Networks, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Best Publications

  • Explaining the user experience of recommender systems

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Martijn C. Willemsen;Zeno Gantner;Hakan Soncu

  • Understanding choice overload in recommender systems

    Dirk Bollen;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Martijn C. Willemsen;Mark Graus

  • Making Decisions about Privacy: Information Disclosure in Context-Aware Recommender Systems

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Alfred Kobsa

  • Evaluating recommender systems with user experiments

    BP Bart Knijnenburg;MC Martijn Willemsen

  • Dimensionality of information disclosure behavior

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Alfred Kobsa;Hongxia Jin

  • Inspectability and control in social recommenders

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Svetlin Bostandjiev;John O'Donovan;Alfred Kobsa

  • Each to his own: how different users call for different interaction methods in recommender systems

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Niels J.M. Reijmer;Martijn C. Willemsen

  • Making privacy personal

    Pamela J. Wisniewski;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Heather Richter Lipford

  • Privacy Aspects of Recommender Systems

    Arik Friedman;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Kris Vanhecke;Luc Martens

  • Recommender Systems for Self-Actualization

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Saadhika Sivakumar;Daricia Wilkinson

  • Effectiveness and Users' Experience of Obfuscation as a Privacy-Enhancing Technology for Sharing Photos

    Yifang Li;Nishant Vishwamitra;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Hongxin Hu

  • Understanding the role of latent feature diversification on choice difficulty and satisfaction

    Martijn C. Willemsen;Mark P. Graus;Bart P. Knijnenburg

  • Inferring Capabilities of Intelligent Agents from Their External Traits

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Martijn C. Willemsen

  • A pragmatic procedure to support the user-centric evaluation of recommender systems

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Martijn C. Willemsen;Alfred Kobsa

  • A Data-Driven Approach to Developing IoT Privacy-Setting Interfaces

    Paritosh Bahirat;Yangyang He;Abhilash Menon;Bart Knijnenburg

  • Preference-based location sharing: are more privacy options really better?

    Bart P. Knijnenburg;Alfred Kobsa;Hongxia Jin

  • Location sharing privacy preference: analysis and personalized recommendation

    Jierui Xie;Bart Piet Knijnenburg;Hongxia Jin

  • Cross-Cultural Privacy Prediction

    Yao Li;Alfred Kobsa;Bart P. Knijnenburg;M-H. Carolyn Nguyen

  • Blur vs. Block: Investigating the Effectiveness of Privacy-Enhancing Obfuscation for Images

    Yifang Li;Nishant Vishwamitra;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Hongxin Hu

  • Give Social Network Users the Privacy They Want

    Pamela Wisniewski;A.K.M. Najmul Islam;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Sameer Patil

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfred Kobsa
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
Hongxia Jin
Hongxia Jin Samsung (United States)
Heather Richter Lipford
Heather Richter Lipford University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Shlomo Berkovsky
Shlomo Berkovsky Macquarie University
Sabarish V. Babu
Sabarish V. Babu Clemson University
Hongxin Hu
Hongxin Hu University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Andrew T. Duchowski
Andrew T. Duchowski Clemson University
Jens Grossklags
Jens Grossklags Technical University of Munich
Luc Martens
Luc Martens Ghent University
Jessica Vitak
Jessica Vitak University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science often opens doors to related fields and diverse career paths. Many students interested in technology look to fields such as physics, data science, or electrical engineering for overlapping skills and career flexibility.

Those looking for affordable options may want to consider the cheapest online physics degree programs, which can provide a strong foundation in analytical thinking and problem-solving. If you’re drawn to working with data, finding the cheapest data science masters in USA can help you gain in-demand skills without overwhelming student debt.

For those attracted to engineering, comparing electrical engineering online tuition costs can help you choose a top-ranked program that fits your budget. Additionally, if you are seeking quick entry into the tech workforce or a career boost, you might explore easy certifications to get that can lead to well-paid jobs in a short time.

Exploring these related subjects and certifications can help you customize your educational journey and find a pathway that aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Bart P. Knijnenburg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles