World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4337
World Ranking
11806
National Ranking
4822

Heather Richter Lipford publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather Richter Lipford sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 104 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Heather Richter Lipford D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather Richter Lipford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heather Richter Lipford is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research spans the intersection of social sciences and computer science, focusing on themes related to privacy, security, and human-technology interaction.

Their recent research contributions include work published in venues such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, the Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, and the Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

Notable papers by Heather Richter Lipford include:

  • Towards Building Community Collective Efficacy for Managing Digital Privacy and Security within Older Adult Communities (2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • From Parental Control to Joint Family Oversight (2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • Examining Collaborative Support for Privacy and Security in the Broader Context of Tech Caregiving (2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction)
  • Evaluating Students' Perceptions of Online Learning with 2-D Virtual Spaces (2022, Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education)
  • Exploring privacy implications of awareness and control mechanisms in smart home devices (2023, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies)

Their work addresses various main topics, including:

  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Child Development and Digital Technology

Heather Richter Lipford's research fields focus primarily on social sciences, with a significant body of work in computer science. Subfields include sociology and political science, information systems, human-computer interaction, education, and computer networks and communications.

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, reflecting a multidisciplinary and team-based approach to research. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Pamela Wiśniewski
  • Jess Kropczynski
  • Mamtaj Akter
  • Leena Alghamdi
  • Amy J. Godfrey

Publication venues where Heather Richter Lipford has contributed multiple works include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Best Publications

  • Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community

    Katherine Strater;Heather Richter Lipford

  • Moving beyond untagging: photo privacy in a tagged world

    Andrew Besmer;Heather Richter Lipford

  • Understanding privacy settings in facebook with an audience view

    Heather Richter Lipford;Andrew Besmer;Jason Watson

  • Contextual gaps: privacy issues on Facebook

    Gordon Hull;Heather Richter Lipford;Celine Latulipe

  • Fighting for my space: coping mechanisms for sns boundary regulation

    Pamela Wisniewski;Heather Lipford;David Wilson

  • Flipped Classroom Strategies for CS Education

    Mary Lou Maher;Celine Latulipe;Heather Lipford;Audrey Rorrer

  • Recovering Reasoning Processes from User Interactions

    Wenwen Dou;Dong Hyun Jeong;F. Stukes;W. Ribarsky

  • Usable Security: History, Themes, and Challenges

    Simson Garfinkel;Heather Richter Lipford

  • Making privacy personal

    Pamela J. Wisniewski;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Heather Richter Lipford

  • Game2Learn: building CS1 learning games for retention

    Tiffany Barnes;Heather Richter;Eve Powell;Amanda Chaffin

  • Game2Learn: improving the motivation of CS1 students

    Tiffany Barnes;Eve Powell;Amanda Chaffin;Heather Lipford

  • A team collaboration space supporting capture and access of virtual meetings

    Werner Geyer;Heather Richter;Ludwin Fuchs;Tom Frauenhofer

  • Tagged photos: concerns, perceptions, and protections

    Andrew Besmer;Heather Lipford

  • Why do programmers make security errors

    Jing Xie;Heather Richter Lipford;Bill Chu

  • Integrating Meeting Capture within a Collaborative Team Environment

    Heather A. Richter;Gregory D. Abowd;Werner Geyer;Ludwin Fuchs

  • Questions developers ask while diagnosing potential security vulnerabilities with static analysis

    Justin Smith;Brittany Johnson;Emerson Murphy-Hill;Bill Chu

  • The impact of social navigation on privacy policy configuration

    Andrew Besmer;Jason Watson;Heather Richter Lipford

  • Formalizing and integrating the dynamic model within OMT

    Enoch Y. Wang;Heather A. Richter;Betty H. C. Cheng

  • Social applications: exploring a more secure framework

    Andrew Besmer;Heather Richter Lipford;Mohamed Shehab;Gorrell Cheek

  • ASIDE: IDE support for web application security

    Jing Xie;Bill Chu;Heather Richter Lipford;John T. Melton

  • Investigating Users' Preferences and Expectations for Always-Listening Voice Assistants

    Madiha Tabassum;Tomasz Kosiński;Alisa Frik;Nathan Malkin

  • +Your circles: sharing behavior on Google+

    Jason Watson;Andrew Besmer;Heather Richter Lipford

  • From Parental Control to Joint Family Oversight

    Unknown

  • Visible Flows: Contextual Integrity and the Design of Privacy Mechanisms on Social Network Sites

    Heather Richter Lipford;Gordon Hull;Celine Latulipe;Andrew Besmer

  • Security During Application Development: an Application Security Expert Perspective

    Tyler W. Thomas;Madiha Tabassum;Bill Chu;Heather Lipford

  • I don't own the data: end user perceptions of smart home device data practices and risks

    Madiha Tabassum;Tomasz Kosiński;Heather Richter Lipford

Frequent Co-Authors

Emerson Murphy-Hill
Emerson Murphy-Hill Google (United States)
David Wilson
David Wilson Binghamton University
Gail-Joon Ahn
Gail-Joon Ahn Arizona State University
Bart P. Knijnenburg
Bart P. Knijnenburg Clemson University
Remco Chang
Remco Chang Tufts University
Tiffany Barnes
Tiffany Barnes North Carolina State University
Robert Biddle
Robert Biddle Carleton University
Mary Lou Maher
Mary Lou Maher University of North Carolina at Charlotte
William Ribarsky
William Ribarsky University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jessica Staddon
Jessica Staddon Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways in STEM fields. Many students choose to expand their skillset by considering related programs, which offer both flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in engineering, pursuing an online degree in mechanical engineering is a strong option. This field combines computer science concepts with hands-on problem solving and design.

If you’re fascinated by the fundamentals of matter and energy, a bachelor of science in physics online can be a great fit, offering foundational knowledge applicable to software development, data analysis, and more.

Data science is another booming area. By enrolling in the cheapest master in data science programs, students can develop in-demand analytical and technological skills for top careers in research, tech, and business.

If your interests lie in electronics and digital systems, the best online electrical engineering programs USA provide pathways to work in robotics, IoT, and telecommunications.

Best Scientists Citing Heather Richter Lipford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles