World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
12483
World Ranking
3281
National Ranking
1589

Lujo Bauer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lujo Bauer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lujo Bauer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lujo Bauer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lujo Bauer is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and conducts research principally in computer science and social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, including artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, information systems, computer networks and communications, and signal processing.

The scientist's research frequently addresses topics related to privacy, security, and data protection. Other key areas include anomaly detection techniques and applications, adversarial robustness in machine learning, user authentication and security systems, advanced malware detection techniques, privacy-preserving technologies in data, and mobile crowdsensing and crowdsourcing.

Lujo Bauer has published extensively, with a strong presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, and Pervasive and Mobile Computing. Other publication venues include JAMA Internal Medicine and Health Affairs.

Notable recent papers include:
"What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention" (2021, Pervasive and Mobile Computing)
"'I would have to evaluate their objections': Privacy tensions between smart home device owners and incidental users" (2021, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies)
"Speculative Privacy Concerns about AR Glasses Data Collection" (2023, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies)
"Did you know this camera tracks your mood?": Understanding Privacy Expectations and Preferences in the Age of Video Analytics" (2021, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies)
"OmniCrawl: Comprehensive Measurement of Web Tracking With Real Desktop and Mobile Browsers" (2021, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies)

Lujo Bauer collaborates frequently with a number of co-authors. These include Keane Lucas, Camille Cobb, Sruti Bhagavatula, Michael K. Reiter, and Yuvraj Agarwal. Collaborations with these researchers reflect ongoing work in topics related to privacy, security, and data protection within their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face Recognition

    Mahmood Sharif;Sruti Bhagavatula;Lujo Bauer;Michael K. Reiter

  • Guess Again (and Again and Again): Measuring Password Strength by Simulating Password-Cracking Algorithms

    P. G. Kelley;S. Komanduri;M. L. Mazurek;R. Shay

  • Of passwords and people: measuring the effect of password-composition policies

    Saranga Komanduri;Richard Shay;Patrick Gage Kelley;Michelle L. Mazurek

  • Edit automata: enforcement mechanisms for run-time security policies

    Jay Ligatti;Lujo Bauer;David Walker

  • Encountering stronger password requirements: user attitudes and behaviors

    Richard Shay;Saranga Komanduri;Patrick Gage Kelley;Pedro Giovanni Leon

  • How does your password measure up? the effect of strength meters on password creation

    Blase Ur;Patrick Gage Kelley;Saranga Komanduri;Joel Lee

  • Measuring password guessability for an entire university

    Michelle L. Mazurek;Saranga Komanduri;Timothy Vidas;Lujo Bauer

  • Android taint flow analysis for app sets

    William Klieber;Lori Flynn;Amar Bhosale;Limin Jia

  • Fast, lean, and accurate: modeling password guessability using neural networks

    William Melicher;Blase Ur;Sean M. Segreti;Saranga Komanduri

  • Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world

    Pardis Emami-Naeini;Sruti Bhagavatula;Hana Habib;Martin Degeling

  • Run-Time Enforcement of Nonsafety Policies

    Jay Ligatti;Lujo Bauer;David Walker

  • Composing security policies with polymer

    Lujo Bauer;Jay Ligatti;David Walker

  • Do Users' Perceptions of Password Security Match Reality?

    Blase Ur;Jonathan Bees;Sean M. Segreti;Lujo Bauer

  • “I added '!' at the end to make it secure”: observing password creation in the lab

    Blase Ur;Fumiko Noma;Jonathan Bees;Sean M. Segreti

  • Expandable grids for visualizing and authoring computer security policies

    Robert W. Reeder;Lujo Bauer;Lorrie Faith Cranor;Michael K. Reiter

  • Tag, you can see it!: using tags for access control in photo sharing

    Peter Klemperer;Yuan Liang;Michelle Mazurek;Manya Sleeper

  • Can long passwords be secure and usable

    Richard Shay;Saranga Komanduri;Adam L. Durity;Phillip (Seyoung) Huh

  • Measuring real-world accuracies and biases in modeling password guessability

    Blase Ur;Sean M. Segreti;Lujo Bauer;Nicolas Christin

  • A General Framework for Adversarial Examples with Objectives

    Mahmood Sharif;Sruti Bhagavatula;Lujo Bauer;Michael K. Reiter

  • What matters to users?: factors that affect users' willingness to share information with online advertisers

    Pedro Giovanni Leon;Blase Ur;Yang Wang;Manya Sleeper

  • Measuring Password Guessability for an Entire University (CMU-CyLab-13-013)

    Michelle L. Mazurek;Saranga Komanduri;Tim Vidas;Lujo Bauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorrie Faith Cranor
Lorrie Faith Cranor Carnegie Mellon University
Michael K. Reiter
Michael K. Reiter Duke University
Nicolas Christin
Nicolas Christin Carnegie Mellon University
Blase Ur
Blase Ur University of Chicago
David Walker
David Walker Princeton University
Patrick Gage Kelley
Patrick Gage Kelley University of New Mexico
Frank Pfenning
Frank Pfenning Carnegie Mellon University
Edward W. Felten
Edward W. Felten Princeton University
Norman Sadeh
Norman Sadeh Carnegie Mellon University
Gregory R. Ganger
Gregory R. Ganger Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up new career pathways within computer science and related STEM fields. Many universities now offer a 2-year computer science degree online, making it easier to advance your skills quickly and enter the job market sooner.

Beyond computer science, students may consider related disciplines such as engineering or applied sciences. Programs like an environmental engineering online degree open up roles in green technology and sustainability sectors. Similarly, those interested in technical design and innovation often look for a mechanical engineering degree online cost to help manage expenses while earning a respected credential.

For students passionate about fundamental science, an online bachelor's degree in physics can lead to exciting opportunities in research, technology, and education. Choosing an online degree allows for flexibility, affordability, and access to a wide range of in-demand careers across the tech and engineering landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Lujo Bauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles