World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
9257
World Ranking
8264
National Ranking
59

Andrei Sabelfeld publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrei Sabelfeld sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrei Sabelfeld D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrei Sabelfeld sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrei Sabelfeld is affiliated with Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. Their body of research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with specific focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their research topics include:

  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)

Sabelfeld has published several recent papers covering topics related to browser extensions, information flow security, and data privacy. These include:

  • "Hardening the security analysis of browser extensions," 2022, Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • "Are chrome extensions compliant with the spirit of least privilege?", 2022, International Journal of Information Security
  • "VERONICA: Expressive and Precise Concurrent Information Flow Security (Extended Version with Technical Appendices)", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Data Privacy in Trigger-Action Systems", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent publication venues reflect an engagement with both conference proceedings and journal articles, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • International Journal of Information Security

Sabelfeld has collaborated with a number of researchers repeatedly in their recent works. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Pablo Picazo-Sanchez
  • Gerardo Schneider
  • Benjamin Eriksson
  • Ivan Oleynikov
  • Elena Pagnin

Best Publications

  • Language-based information-flow security

    A. Sabelfeld;A.C. Myers

  • Probabilistic noninterference for multi-threaded programs

    A. Sabelfeld;D. Sands

  • A Per Model of Secure Information Flow in Sequential Programs

    Andrei Sabelfeld;David Sands

  • Declassification: Dimensions and principles

    Andrei Sabelfeld;David Sands

  • Dimensions and principles of declassification

    A. Sabelfeld;D. Sands

  • A Model for Delimited Information Release

    Andrei Sabelfeld;Andrew C. Myers

  • Dynamic vs. Static Flow-Sensitive Security Analysis

    Alejandro Russo;Andrei Sabelfeld

  • Termination-Insensitive Noninterference Leaks More Than Just a Bit

    Aslan Askarov;Sebastian Hunt;Andrei Sabelfeld;David Sands

  • JSFlow: tracking information flow in JavaScript and its APIs

    Daniel Hedin;Arnar Birgisson;Luciano Bello;Andrei Sabelfeld

  • Information-Flow Security for a Core of JavaScript

    D. Hedin;A. Sabelfeld

  • Gradual Release: Unifying Declassification, Encryption and Key Release Policies

    A. Askarov;A. Sabelfeld

  • Computer Security – ESORICS 2006

    Dieter Gollmann;Jan Meier;Andrei Sabelfeld

  • Tight Enforcement of Information-Release Policies for Dynamic Languages

    Aslan Askarov;Andrei Sabelfeld

  • A Perspective on Information-Flow Control.

    Daniel Hedin;Andrei Sabelfeld

  • From dynamic to static and back: riding the roller coaster of information-flow control research

    Andrei Sabelfeld;Alejandro Russo

  • Enforcing robust declassification

    A.C. Myers;A. Sabelfeld;S. Zdancewic

  • Enforcing robust declassification and qualified robustness

    Andrew C. Myers;Andrei Sabelfeld;Steve Zdancewic

  • If This Then What?: Controlling Flows in IoT Apps

    Iulia Bastys;Musard Balliu;Andrei Sabelfeld

  • Static Confidentiality Enforcement for Distributed Programs

    Andrei Sabelfeld;Heiko Mantel

  • Tracking information flow in dynamic tree structures

    Alejandro Russo;Andrei Sabelfeld;Andrey Chudnov

  • Computer Security ESORICS 2006: 11th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, Hamburg, Germany, September 18-20, 2006, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

    Eugene Asarin;Dieter Gollmann;Jan Meier;Andrei Sabelfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew C. Myers
Andrew C. Myers Cornell University
Gilles Barthe
Gilles Barthe Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy
Anindya Banerjee
Anindya Banerjee Dartmouth College
Peter Müller
Peter Müller ETH Zurich
Wouter Joosen
Wouter Joosen KU Leuven
Steve Zdancewic
Steve Zdancewic University of Pennsylvania
John Hughes
John Hughes Chalmers University of Technology
Michael Pradel
Michael Pradel University of Stuttgart
Claudio Orlandi
Claudio Orlandi Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career paths. Many disciplines related to technology, management, and analytics can be pursued 100% online, providing flexibility and affordability for students.

For example, individuals interested in law enforcement and technology can explore a criminal justice degree online, which typically covers cybersecurity and digital evidence. For those drawn to finance or business data systems, pursuing a cheap online accounting degree is a cost-effective way to enter the growing world of financial technology (FinTech).

Advanced programs such as a data science master online are highly sought after in today’s workforce. These degrees blend computer science with analytics, preparing graduates for roles in AI and big data. Alternatively, those aiming for leadership positions in infrastructure projects can earn an online degree for construction management, useful for tech-driven construction roles.

Whatever your aspiration, online degrees offer diverse routes and career pathways interconnected with computer science—from security, data, and business to management.

Best Scientists Citing Andrei Sabelfeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles