World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joseph P. Iannotti

Joseph P. Iannotti

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
29714
World Ranking
8368
National Ranking
4325

Joseph P. Iannotti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph P. Iannotti sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 369 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joseph P. Iannotti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph P. Iannotti sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors

Overview

Joseph P. Iannotti is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States, contributing extensively to the field of medicine, particularly within surgery and epidemiology. Their research focuses significantly on shoulder injury and treatment, as well as broader topics within orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation.

The scientist's recent publications reflect an emphasis on shoulder-related conditions and surgical outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • "Predictors of acromial and scapular stress fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES Complications of RSA Multicenter Research Group" (2021) published in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • "The Influence of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Design on Biomechanics" (2023) in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
  • "An Update on Surgical Management of the Repairable Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tear" (2020) in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • "Stepped Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 and B3 Glenoid Pathology" (2021) in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • "Predictors of dislocations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES complications of RSA multicenter research group" (2023) in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Joseph P. Iannotti frequently collaborates with a range of coauthors, some of whom include:

  • Eric T. Ricchetti
  • Vahid Entezari
  • Jason Ho
  • Kathleen A. Derwin
  • Sambit Sahoo

The majority of their publications appear in specialized journals within orthopedics and musculoskeletal medicine. The most common publication venues are:

  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • JSES International
  • Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Their work spans several subfields of medicine, with a primary focus on surgery, epidemiology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. These subfields reflect the range of topics they explore, from shoulder and clavicle injuries to cardiac valve diseases and treatments.

Main research topics include:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Joseph P. Iannotti has been recognized by professional organizations, including an appointment as a Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors in 2016.

Best Publications

  • A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function

    Robin R. Richards;Kai Nan An;Louis U. Bigliani;Richard J. Friedman

  • The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders.

    Joseph Iannotti;J. P. Gabriel;S. L. Schneck;B. G. Evans

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value

    J P Iannotti;M B Zlatkin;J L Esterhai;H Y Kressel

  • Porcine small intestine submucosa augmentation of surgical repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears. A randomized, controlled trial.

    Joseph P. Iannotti;Michael J. Codsi;Young W. Kwon;Kathleen Derwin

  • Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: A multicenter study

    Tom R. Norris;Joseph P. Iannotti

  • Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

    Joseph P Iannotti;Tom R Norris

  • Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging

    M B Zlatkin;J P Iannotti;M C Roberts;J L Esterhai

  • Commercial extracellular matrix scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon repair. Biomechanical, biochemical, and cellular properties.

    Kathleen A. Derwin;Andrew R. Baker;Rebecca K. Spragg;Diane R. Leigh

  • Conversion of Mechanical Force into TGF-β-Mediated Biochemical Signals

    Toru Maeda;Tomoya Sakabe;Ataru Sunaga;Keiko Sakai

  • Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study.

    Joseph P. Iannotti;Allen Deutsch;Andrew Green;Sally Rudicel

  • A standardized method for assessment of elbow function

    G J King;R R Richards;J D Zuckerman;R Blasier

  • Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.

    Young W. Kwon;Kimerly A. Powell;Jae Kwang Yum;John J. Brems

  • Prospective longitudinal analysis of postoperative shoulder function : a ten-year follow-up study of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

    Leesa M. Galatz;Sean Griggs;Brian D. Cameron;Joseph P. Iannotti

  • The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity.

    Brian G. Leggin;Lori A. Michener;Michael A. Shaffer;Susan K. Brenneman

  • Evaluation of the Neer System of Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Computerized Tomographic Scans and Plain Radiographs

    Joseph Bernstein;Louis M. Adler;John E. Blank;Robert M. Dalsey

  • Rotator cuff tendinosis in an animal model: role of extrinsic and overuse factors

    Louis J. Soslowsky;Stavros Thomopoulos;Adil Esmail;Colleen L. Flanagan

  • The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: a biomechanical analysis.

    John J. Klimkiewicz;Gerald R. Williams;Jerry S. Sher;Andrew Karduna

  • Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.

    Joseph P. Iannotti;James Ciccone;Daniel D. Buss;Jeffrey L. Visotsky

  • Intrarater and interrater reliability of three isometric dynamometers in assessing shoulder strength

    Brian G. Leggin;Brian G. Leggin;Ramona M. Neuman;Ramona M. Neuman;Joseph P. Iannotti;Joseph P. Iannotti;Gerald R. Williams;Gerald R. Williams

  • Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Surgical technique.

    Michael J. Codsi;Shawn Hennigan;Richard Herzog;Sami Kella

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Bauer
Thomas W. Bauer Hospital for Special Surgery
Jon J.P. Warner
Jon J.P. Warner Harvard University
Louis U. Bigliani
Louis U. Bigliani Columbia University
Kurt P. Spindler
Kurt P. Spindler Cleveland Clinic
Evan L. Flatow
Evan L. Flatow Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Herbert Y. Kressel
Herbert Y. Kressel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Thay Q. Lee
Thay Q. Lee University of California, Irvine
Michael A. Mont
Michael A. Mont Cleveland Clinic
Robert E. Booth
Robert E. Booth University of Colorado Denver
Xi Chen
Xi Chen University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of fulfilling health careers—and many pathways now extend online. For those interested in leadership roles within healthcare, consider a master's in healthcare administration online. This degree can prepare you for management positions in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations, often at your own pace.

Nurses aiming for advanced practice or executive roles may benefit from the most affordable dnp programs, which are offered online to fit busy professional schedules. PharmD hopefuls can now pursue part of their training through an online pharmacist degree, though some in-person clinical training may still be required.

Lastly, the digital health era has increased demand for IT specialists. If you are interested in the intersection of health and tech, health information technology programs online can offer a flexible route into this growing field. Online options make it possible to upskill while balancing work or family commitments, making healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph P. Iannotti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles