World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
20349
World Ranking
18486
National Ranking
9217

Thay Q. Lee publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thay Q. Lee sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 424 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thay Q. Lee D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thay Q. Lee sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thay Q. Lee is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on surgery. Their research includes a strong emphasis on orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation, encompassing topics related to shoulder, elbow, forearm, and knee injuries.

The scientist's work spans multiple subfields of medicine, prominently including:

  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Lee's main research topics include:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
  • Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

The researcher has published 293 papers in the field of medicine, with a significant number of publications in surgery (173 studies). Their frequent publication venues are noted for orthopedic and sports medicine research:

  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (22 publications)
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (11 publications)
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (9 publications)
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (7 publications)
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery (6 publications)

Several recent papers highlight the scope and focus of Lee's research:

  • Supplemental Fixation of Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Dual-Plate and Plate-Nail Constructs, 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes With and Without Subscapularis Tear, 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Allograft Compared With Double- and Single-Layer Dermal Allograft: A Biomechanical Study, 2020, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Human Motor Endplate Remodeling After Traumatic Nerve Injury, 2020, Journal of Neurosurgery
  • Anterolateral Structure Reconstruction Similarly Improves the Stability and Causes Less Overconstraint in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees Compared With Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis: A Biomechanical Study, 2021, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lee include:

  • Michelle H. McGarry
  • Gregory J. Adamson
  • Victor Hung
  • Genevieve Fraipont
  • Nilay A. Patel

This combination of prolific output, diverse subfields, and consistent collaboration across multiple orthopedic and sports medicine venues positions Thay Q. Lee as an active contributor to the ongoing development of clinical and biomechanical understanding within their domains of expertise.

Best Publications

  • Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

    Teruhisa Mihata;Thay Q. Lee;Chisato Watanabe;Kunimoto Fukunishi

  • Superior Capsule Reconstruction to Restore Superior Stability in Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

    Teruhisa Mihata;Teruhisa Mihata;Teruhisa Mihata;Michelle H. McGarry;Michelle H. McGarry;Joseph M. Pirolo;Joseph M. Pirolo;Mitsuo Kinoshita

  • Biomechanical Comparison of a Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Anchor Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair

    David H. Kim;Neal S. ElAttrache;James E. Tibone;Bong-Jae Jun

  • Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique

    Maxwell C. Park;Neal S. ElAttrache;James E. Tibone;Christopher S. Ahmad

  • Part II: Biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique.

    Maxwell C. Park;James E. Tibone;Neal S. ElAttrache;Christopher S. Ahmad

  • The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure.

    Thay Q Lee;Garrett Morris;Rick P Csintalan

  • Stability and instability of the glenohumeral joint: the role of shoulder muscles.

    Joanne E. Labriola;Thay Q. Lee;Richard E. Debski;Patrick J. McMahon

  • A cadaveric model of the throwing shoulder: a possible etiology of superior labrum anterior-to-posterior lesions.

    Mark G. Grossman;James E. Tibone;Michelle H. McGarry;David J. Schneider

  • The influence of fixed rotational deformities of the femur on the patellofemoral contact pressures in human cadaver knees.

    Thay Q. Lee;Sanford H. Anzel;Kimberly A. Bennett;Donald Pang

  • Biomechanical Effect of Thickness and Tension of Fascia Lata Graft on Glenohumeral Stability for Superior Capsule Reconstruction in Irreparable Supraspinatus Tears.

    Teruhisa Mihata;Michelle H. McGarry;Timothy Kahn;Iliya Goldberg

  • Biomechanical Evaluation of a New Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique with Interference Screw Fixation

    Christopher S. Ahmad;Thay Q. Lee;Neal S. ElAttrache

  • Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics.

    Rick P Csintalan;Michele M Schulz;Jonathan Woo;Patrick J McMahon

  • Biomechanical Role of Capsular Continuity in Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon.

    Teruhisa Mihata;Teruhisa Mihata;Michelle H. McGarry;Timothy Kahn;Iliya Goldberg

  • Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty.

    Todd A. Shapiro;Michelle H. McGarry;Ranjan Gupta;Yeon Soo Lee

  • Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Can Eliminate Pseudoparalysis in Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

    Teruhisa Mihata;Thay Q. Lee;Thay Q. Lee;Akihiko Hasegawa;Takeshi Kawakami

  • Return to Sports and Physical Work After Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Among Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

    Teruhisa Mihata;Thay Q Lee;Thay Q Lee;Kunimoto Fukunishi;Yasuo Itami

  • The effects of axial and multi-plane loading of the extensor mechanism on the patellofemoral joint.

    Christopher M. Powers;James C. Lilley;James C. Lilley;Thay Q. Lee;Thay Q. Lee;Thay Q. Lee

  • A biomechanical cadaveric study comparing superior capsule reconstruction using fascia lata allograft with human dermal allograft for irreparable rotator cuff tear.

    Teruhisa Mihata;Christopher N.H. Bui;Masaki Akeda;Matthew A. Cavagnaro

  • Role of the superior shoulder capsule in passive stability of the glenohumeral joint.

    Yoko Ishihara;Teruhisa Mihata;Teruhisa Mihata;Mallika Tamboli;Lauren Nguyen

  • Five-Year Follow-up of Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

    Teruhisa Mihata;Thay Q Lee;Akihiko Hasegawa;Kunimoto Fukunishi

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher M. Powers
Christopher M. Powers University of Southern California
Savio L. C. Woo
Savio L. C. Woo Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Stephen S. Burkhart
Stephen S. Burkhart The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Steven R. Garfin
Steven R. Garfin University of California, San Diego
David W. Altchek
David W. Altchek Hospital for Special Surgery
Richard J. Hawkins
Richard J. Hawkins University of Western Ontario
Joseph P. Iannotti
Joseph P. Iannotti Cleveland Clinic
Christopher Uggen
Christopher Uggen University of Minnesota
Oswald Steward
Oswald Steward University of California, Irvine
Peter O. Newton
Peter O. Newton Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career pathways in medicine extends well beyond becoming a physician. Many students consider online options that offer flexibility and specialization. For those interested in leadership and management roles within healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration accelerated degree can be an efficient route. These programs are designed to fast-track students into rewarding administrative careers in various healthcare settings.

If you're already an RN, you might think about bridging to advanced clinical roles. ADN to MSN bridge programs help registered nurses gain their master's degree, opening doors to higher-level practice, education, or leadership roles.

Nutrition is another expanding field related to medicine. Accredited online degrees in nutrition prepare graduates for impactful roles in public health, research, or wellness coaching.

For those aiming at top-level executive positions in hospitals or health systems, pursuing accredited mha programs can be a strategic choice. These recognized degrees provide in-depth knowledge in healthcare management and can help lead to senior roles in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Thay Q. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles