World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11254 10578 5777 5343 269 33069

Stephen S. Burkhart publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen S. Burkhart between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen S. Burkhart published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2004. 1 of the 277 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2004. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

277 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen S. Burkhart: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 8
1997 6
1998 5
1999 2
2000 9
2001 10
2002 10
2003 21
2004 23
2005 8
2006 10
2007 9
2008 8
2009 8
2010 11
2011 12
2012 19
2013 7
2014 9
2015 8
2016 14
2017 15
2018 5
2019 10
2020 5
2021 1
2022 0
2023 3
2024 3
2025 0
2026 1
Total 277
Download as CSV

Stephen S. Burkhart publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen S. Burkhart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 269 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 269
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen S. Burkhart D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen S. Burkhart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen S. Burkhart is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Surgery, Epidemiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Neurology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Trauma Management and Diagnosis
  • Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • History of Medical Practice

Burkhart has a number of recent peer-reviewed papers. These include:

  • "Prospective 1-Year Outcomes Are Maintained at Short-Term Final Follow-Up After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Augmentation of Complete Rotator Cuff Repair," published in 2021 in Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • "Shoulder arthroscopy: a bridge from the past to the future," published in 2020 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • "Similar Value Demonstrated in the Short-Term Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears," published in 2023 in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Successful Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Is Possible in the Setting of Prior Deep Infection," published in 2020 in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, Manipulation Under Anesthesia, and Capsular Release for Concurrent Rotator Cuff Tear and Adhesive Capsulitis Maintain Improvements in Outcomes and Range of Motion at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up," published in 2023 in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Burkhart include:

  • Robert U. Hartzler
  • Timothy J. Degan
  • Andrés Rahal
  • Thomas M. DeBerardino
  • Andrew M. Gabig

Burkhart's work is frequently published in journals such as:

  • Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Best Publications

  • Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Joe F. De Beer

  • The disabled throwing shoulder: Spectrum of pathology part I: Pathoanatomy and biomechanics

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Craig D. Morgan;W.Ben Kibler

  • The disabled throwing shoulder: Spectrum of pathology. Part III: The SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation

    Stephen S Burkhart;Craig D Morgan;W Ben Kibler

  • Results of Modified Latarjet Reconstruction in Patients With Anteroinferior Instability and Significant Bone Loss

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Joe F. De Beer;Johannes R.H. Barth;Tim Criswell

  • Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from "engaging/non-engaging" lesion to "on-track/off-track" lesion.

    Giovanni Di Giacomo;Eiji Itoi;Stephen S. Burkhart

  • The peel-back mechanism: its role in producing and extending posterior type II SLAP lesions and its effect on SLAP repair rehabilitation

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Craig D. Morgan

  • Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique—margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Steven M. Danaceau;Charles E. Pearce

  • Orthopaedic applications for PLA-PGA biodegradable polymers

    KA Athanasiou;CM Agrawal;FA Barber;SS Burkhart

  • Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Wesley M. Nottage;Darrell J. Ogilvie-Harris;Harvey S. Kohn

  • The Rotator Crescent and Rotator Cable: An Anatomic Description of the Shoulder's “Suspension Bridge”

    Stephen S. Burkhart;James C. Esch;R. Scott Jolson

  • The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss.

    Ian K.Y Lo;Peter M Parten;Stephen S Burkhart

  • Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Joe F. DeBeer;Armin M. Tehrany;Peter M. Parten

  • Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff

    Ian K.Y Lo;Stephen S Burkhart

  • Shoulder injuries in overhead athletes. The "dead arm" revisited.

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Craig D. Morgan;W. Benjamin Kibler

  • Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Jose L. Diaz Pagàn;Michael A. Wirth;K.A. Athanasiou

  • The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology. Part II: evaluation and treatment of SLAP lesions in throwers.

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Craig D. Morgan;W.Ben Kibler

  • Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale.

    Stephen S. Burkhart

  • Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: Technique and preliminary results

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Armin M. Tehrany

  • Preliminary Results of Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction with Dermal Allograft.

    Patrick J. Denard;Paul C. Brady;Christopher R. Adams;John M. Tokish

  • Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears With Stage 3 and 4 Fatty Degeneration

    Stephen S. Burkhart;Johannes R.H. Barth;David P. Richards;Michael B. Zlatkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kyriacos A. Athanasiou
Kyriacos A. Athanasiou University of California, Irvine
Brian J. Cole
Brian J. Cole Rush University Medical Center
Thay Q. Lee
Thay Q. Lee University of California, Irvine
Anthony A. Romeo
Anthony A. Romeo Rush University Medical Center
Eiji Itoi
Eiji Itoi Tohoku University
Robert A. Arciero
Robert A. Arciero University of Connecticut
Peter J. Millett
Peter J. Millett Steadman Clinic
Augustus D. Mazzocca
Augustus D. Mazzocca Harvard Medical School
James C.H. Goh
James C.H. Goh National University of Singapore
Jon J.P. Warner
Jon J.P. Warner Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but prefer alternatives to the traditional path of studying Medicine in the USA, there are flexible online degrees that offer rewarding career options. Many students choose paths such as pharmacy, health information management, medical billing and coding, or advanced nursing practice, all of which can be pursued remotely.

For those considering the pharmaceutical field, pursuing pharmacy school online is a cost-effective way to earn a doctorate in pharmacy while balancing other commitments. If you excel at organizing health data, accredited him programs train students to manage patient records, an increasingly vital specialty within the healthcare system.

Another high-demand path is medical coding. Obtaining a medical coding certification online can quickly open doors to remote jobs in hospitals and clinics. Additionally, aspiring nurse practitioners can find top-quality education through the cheapest online fnp program options, making an advanced nursing career more accessible and affordable.

These online degrees support varied career ambitions and give students the flexibility to enter or advance within the healthcare sector from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen S. Burkhart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles