World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
24688
World Ranking
14676
National Ranking
7424

Nikhil N. Verma publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikhil N. Verma sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 746 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nikhil N. Verma D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikhil N. Verma sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nikhil N. Verma is affiliated with Rush University Medical Center in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio in medicine, particularly focusing on surgery and orthopedics. Their work spans several subfields including surgery, epidemiology, orthopedics and sports medicine, rehabilitation, and rheumatology.

Their main topics of research include:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment

Verma's frequent publication venues demonstrate a focused contribution to orthopedic and sports medicine literature. Key journals where their work appears include:

  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Their collaboration network includes several prominent co-authors with repeated joint publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships. Notable frequent co-authors are:

  • Brian J. Cole
  • Jorge Chahla
  • Adam B. Yanke
  • Brian Forsythe
  • Grant E. Garrigues

Nikhil N. Verma has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed papers. Selected recent publications include:

  • InSpace Implant Compared with Partial Repair for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears, 2022, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Anterior Shoulder Instability Part I-Diagnosis, Nonoperative Management, and Bankart Repair-An International Consensus Statement, 2021, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Anterior Shoulder Instability Part II-Latarjet, Remplissage, and Glenoid Bone-Grafting-An International Consensus Statement, 2021, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Relative Efficacy of Intra-articular Injections in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis, 2021, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Regenerative Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis and Chondral Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2020, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Best Publications

  • Normalization of the Constant score

    Leonid I. Katolik;Anthony A. Romeo;Brian J. Cole;Nikhil N. Verma

  • Glenoid bone deficiency in recurrent anterior shoulder instability: diagnosis and management.

    Dana P. Piasecki;Nikhil N. Verma;Anthony A. Romeo;William N. Levine

  • Long-term outcomes after Bankart shoulder stabilization.

    Joshua D. Harris;Anil K. Gupta;Nathan A. Mall;Geoffrey D. Abrams

  • Long Head of the Biceps Tendinopathy: Diagnosis and Management

    Shane J. Nho;Eric J. Strauss;Brett A. Lenart;Matthew T. Provencher

  • Does Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Provide Clinically Superior Outcomes Compared With Other Therapies in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses.

    Kirk A. Campbell;Bryan M. Saltzman;Randy Mascarenhas;M. Michael Khair

  • Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

    Geoffrey D. Abrams;Joshua D. Harris;Anil K. Gupta;Frank M. McCormick

  • Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

    Gregory L. Cvetanovich;Anirudh K. Gowd;Joseph N. Liu;Benedict U. Nwachukwu

  • Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: Low rates of incidence following surgery

    Shane J. Nho;Stefanie N. Reiff;Nikhil N. Verma;Mark A. Slabaugh

  • Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair

    Mark A. Slabaugh;Shane J. Nho;Robert C. Grumet;Joseph B. Wilson

  • Is Local Viscosupplementation Injection Clinically Superior to Other Therapies in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses

    Kirk A. Campbell;Brandon J. Erickson;Bryan M. Saltzman;Randhir Mascarenhas

  • All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up.

    Nikhil N. Verma;Warren Dunn;Ronald S. Adler;Frank A. Cordasco

  • The role of platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review with quantitative synthesis.

    Jaskarndip Chahal;Jaskarndip Chahal;Geoffrey S. Van Thiel;Nathan Mall;Wendell Heard

  • Normalization of Glenohumeral Articular Contact Pressures After Latarjet or Iliac Crest Bone-Grafting

    Neil Ghodadra;Aman Gupta;Anthony A Romeo;Bernard R Bach

  • Multimedia article. The arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of the literature.

    Eric J. Strauss;Michael J. Salata;James Kercher;Joseph U. Barker

  • Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Goutallier Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proposal of a Simplified Classification System to Increase Reliability

    Mark A. Slabaugh;Nicole A. Friel;Vasili Karas;Anthony A. Romeo

  • Prospective evaluation of allograft meniscus transplantation : A minimum 2-year follow-up

    Brian J. Cole;Michael G. Dennis;Stephen J. Lee;Shane J. Nho

  • Contact pressure at osteochondral donor sites in the patellofemoral joint

    Ralph B. Garretson;Leonid I. Katolik;Nikhil Verma;Paul R. Beck

  • Return to sport after ACL reconstruction.

    Joshua D. Harris;Geoffrey D. Abrams;Bernard R. Bach;Donna Williams

  • Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years

    Robert A. Sershon;Geoffrey S. Van Thiel;Emery C. Lin;Kevin C. McGill

  • An Evidenced-Based Examination of the Epidemiology and Outcomes of Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears

    Nathan A. Mall;Andrew S. Lee;Jaskarndip Chahal;Seth L. Sherman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian J. Cole
Brian J. Cole Rush University Medical Center
Anthony A. Romeo
Anthony A. Romeo Rush University Medical Center
Bernard R. Bach
Bernard R. Bach Rush University Medical Center
Shane J. Nho
Shane J. Nho Rush University Medical Center
Stephen J. O'Brien
Stephen J. O'Brien Nova Southeastern University
Pradeep Das
Pradeep Das Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences
Augustus D. Mazzocca
Augustus D. Mazzocca Harvard Medical School
Russell F. Warren
Russell F. Warren Hospital for Special Surgery
Alison Finnegan
Alison Finnegan Rush University Medical Center
Sujit K. Bhattacharya
Sujit K. Bhattacharya Indian Council of Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t just mean becoming a doctor. There are a range of online degrees that open doors to rewarding roles in healthcare. For those interested in healthcare management, pursuing a health care administration degree is a strong choice, offering skills in leadership, hospital operations, and strategy.

Registered nurses seeking to advance their careers can look into asn to nurse practitioner programs, which bridge the gap between an associate nursing degree and a master’s-level nurse practitioner credential. These programs provide more independence in clinical roles and higher earning potential.

The growing interest in nutrition and wellness has created pathways for those interested in the science behind food and health. If this is your passion, consider earning a best online food science degree to learn about human nutrition, dietetics, and food innovation.

Aspiring healthcare leaders should also review the cahme accredited online mha programs list for advanced graduate programs in healthcare administration. These accredited master’s degrees ensure rigorous standards for preparing future executives and administrators.

Best Scientists Citing Nikhil N. Verma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles