World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
37106
World Ranking
9229
National Ranking
4759

Frederick A. Matsen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick A. Matsen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 406 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederick A. Matsen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick A. Matsen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick A. Matsen is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their body of research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Surgery, as well as related subfields such as Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Clinical Biochemistry.

Their work explores several main topics, including:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Surgical site infection prevention
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Frederick A. Matsen's research has been published across multiple venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • International Orthopaedics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • JBJS Open Access
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Recent significant papers include:

  • Impact of previous non-arthroplasty surgery on clinical outcomes after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, 2020, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty with Nonprosthetic Glenoid Arthroplasty, 2021, JBJS Reviews
  • Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with All-Polyethylene Glenoid Component for Primary Osteoarthritis with Glenoid Deficiencies, 2020, JBJS Open Access
  • Assessing the Value to the Patient of New Technologies in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, 2021, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • The minimal clinically important differences of the Simple Shoulder Test are different for different arthroplasty types, 2022, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Their frequent collaborators include Anastasia J. Whitson, Jason E. Hsu, Corey J. Schiffman, and Jie Yao, who have coauthored a substantial number of publications with Matsen.

Best Publications

  • Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff.

    D T Harryman;L A Mack;K Y Wang;S E Jackins

  • Electrospun chitosan-based nanofibers and their cellular compatibility.

    Narayan Bhattarai;Dennis Edmondson;Omid Veiseh;Frederick A. Matsen

  • TRANSLATION OF THE HUMERAL HEAD ON THE GLENOID WITH PASSIVE GLENOHUMERAL MOTION

    Douglas T. Harryman;John A. Sidles;John M. Clark;Kevin J. Mcquade

  • pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree

    Frederick A Matsen;Robin B Kodner;E Virginia Armbrust

  • Orthopedic saw guide for use in a robot-aided system for surgery

    Frederick A. Matsen;Joseph L. Garbini;John A. Sidles;Donald C. Baumgarten

  • The role of the rotator interval capsule in passive motion and stability of the shoulder.

    D T Harryman;J A Sidles;S L Harris;F A Matsen

  • Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty: Association with rotator cuff deficiency

    Jonathan L. Franklin;William P. Barrett;Sarah E. Jackins;Frederick A. Matsen

  • Diagnosis and management of compartmental syndromes.

    Frederick A. Matsen;Robert A. Winquist;Richard B. Krugmire

  • Bacterial Communities in Women with Bacterial Vaginosis: High Resolution Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Relationships of Microbiota to Clinical Criteria

    Sujatha Srinivasan;Noah G. Hoffman;Martin T. Morgan;Frederick A. Matsen

  • Total shoulder arthroplasty.

    W P Barrett;J L Franklin;S E Jackins;C R Wyss

  • PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes.

    Aaron E. Darling;Aaron E. Darling;Guillaume Jospin;Eric Lowe;Frederick A. Matsen

  • Glenohumeral Stability From Concavity-Compression: A Quantitative Analysis

    Steven B. Lippitt;J. Eric Vanderhooft;Scott L. Harris;John A. Sidles

  • Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability.

    Steven Lippitt;Frederick Matsen

  • The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion.

    Mark D. Lazarus;Kirk L. Jensen;Carleton Southworth;Frederick A. Matsen

  • Rotator Cuff Repair: Published Evidence on Factors Associated With Repair Integrity and Clinical Outcome

    Matthew D. McElvany;Erik McGoldrick;Albert O. Gee;Moni Blazej Neradilek

  • Ligament length relationships in the moving knee

    John A. Sidles;Roger V. Larson;Joseph L. Garbini;Daniel J. Downey

  • Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties.

    Samer S. Hasan;Jordan M. Leith;Barry Campbell;Ranjit Kapil

  • Optimization of Periprosthetic Culture for Diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes Prosthetic Joint Infection

    Susan M. Butler-Wu;Erica M. Burns;Paul S. Pottinger;Amalia S. Magaret

  • Complications about the glenohumeral joint related to the use of screws and staples.

    J D Zuckerman;F A Matsen

  • An approach to the repair of avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments in the management of traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability.

    S C Thomas;F A Matsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Narayan Bhattarai
Narayan Bhattarai North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
Joseph D. Zuckerman
Joseph D. Zuckerman New York University
Roger E. Bumgarner
Roger E. Bumgarner University of Washington
Miqin Zhang
Miqin Zhang University of Washington
Anthony A. Romeo
Anthony A. Romeo Rush University Medical Center
Nayak L. Polissar
Nayak L. Polissar University of Washington
Eiji Itoi
Eiji Itoi Tohoku University
Gilles Walch
Gilles Walch University of California, San Francisco
Joseph P. Iannotti
Joseph P. Iannotti Cleveland Clinic
James D. Kelly
James D. Kelly Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education doesn’t end with traditional MD programs. Today, there are diverse medical billing and coding online schools that equip students with in-demand healthcare administration and records skills—including options with financial aid.

For those interested in patient care, several nursing schools that don’t require teas or hesi make it easier for adult learners and career changers to enter the nursing field without standardized testing barriers.

Leadership roles in the health sector are also more accessible through a health care administration degree online. Accelerated programs allow you to fast-track your managerial career and make a broader impact within hospitals and clinics.

Practicing nurses ready to advance can enroll in rn to np programs that bridge the gap to becoming a Nurse Practitioner. These online pathways offer flexibility and advanced clinical preparation for greater responsibility in health care delivery.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick A. Matsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles