World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 56 4116 4001 1950 1883 355 11319

Mary Lou Maher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Lou Maher between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Lou Maher published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2013. 18 of the 413 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

413 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Lou Maher: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 4
1986 8
1987 6
1988 4
1989 3
1990 6
1991 2
1992 4
1993 6
1994 11
1995 7
1996 16
1997 8
1998 5
1999 8
2000 15
2001 4
2002 3
2003 7
2004 7
2005 14
2006 12
2007 18
2008 7
2009 18
2010 7
2011 11
2012 7
2013 24
2014 24
2015 10
2016 10
2017 7
2018 15
2019 12
2020 11
2021 11
2022 15
2023 13
2024 10
2025 17
2026 1
Total 413
Download as CSV

Mary Lou Maher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Lou Maher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 352–361 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 355 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162 355
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Lou Maher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Lou Maher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458 56
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Lou Maher is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of computer science and social sciences, with notable contributions in artificial intelligence, computer science applications, human-computer interaction, sociology and political science, and safety research.

The main topics covered in Mary Lou Maher's work include misinformation and its impacts, ethics and social impacts of AI, innovative human-technology interaction, online learning and analytics, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, design education and practice, and teaching and learning programming.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Maher include the following:

  • Designing Creative AI Partners with COFI: A Framework for Modeling Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creative Systems (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • The Effect of AI-Based Inspiration on Human Design Ideation (2023), published in International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
  • Understanding User Perceptions, Collaborative Experience and User Engagement in Different Human-AI Interaction Designs for Co-Creative Systems (2022), published in Creativity and Cognition
  • Perspectives on Design Creativity and Innovation Research: 10 Years Later (2022), published in International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
  • User Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Human-AI Co-Creativity: A Design Fiction Study (2023), published in Creativity and Cognition

Mary Lou Maher frequently collaborates with these co-authors:

  • Jeba Rezwana
  • Ali Almadan
  • Sri Yash Tadimalla
  • Mohsen Dorodchi
  • Xi Niu

The venues where Maher's work appears regularly include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • EDULEARN proceedings
  • International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning

    Ramon Lopez De Mantaras;David McSherry;Derek Bridge;David Leake

  • Case-Based Reasoning in Design

    Mary Lou Maher;M. Bala Balachandran;Dong Mei Zhang

  • Formalising Design Exploration as Co-Evolution

    Mary Lou Maher;Josiah Poon;Sylvie Boulanger

  • Modeling Design Exploration as Co-Evolution

    Mary Lou Maher;Josiah Poon

  • Modeling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design

    John S. Gero;Mary Lou Maher

  • Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design

    Mary Lou Maher;Hsien-Hui Tang

  • Process models for design synthesis

    Mary Lou Maher

  • Understanding Virtual Design Studios

    Mary Lou Maher;Simeon J. Simoff;Anna Cicognani

  • Case-Based Reasoning in Design

    M.L. Maher;A. Gomez de Silva Garza

  • The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design

    Mi Jeong Kim;Mary Lou Maher

  • Integrated of software environment for building design and construction

    S. J. Fenves;U. Flemming;U. Flemming;C. Henndrickson;M. L. Maher

  • Issues and Applications of Case Based Reasoning to Design

    Mary Lou Maher;Pearl Pu

  • Flipped Classroom Strategies for CS Education

    Mary Lou Maher;Celine Latulipe;Heather Lipford;Audrey Rorrer

  • Multidisciplinary collaborative design in virtual environments

    Mike A. Rosenman;Gregory Smith;M. L. Maher;Lan Ding

  • Analysing participation in collaborative design environments

    Simeon J Simoff;Mary Lou Maher

  • Shared understanding in computer-supported collaborative design

    Milad Saad;Mary Lou Maher

  • Coding and modelling communication in architectural collaborative design

    Gerard Cesar Gabriel;Mary Lou Maher

  • Expert Systems for Civil Engineers: Technology and Application

    Mary Lou Maher

  • A Model of Co-evolutionary Design

    Mary Lou Maher

  • Co-evolution and emergence in design

    Josiah Poon;Mary Lou Maher

  • CADSYN: A case-based design process model

    Mary Lou Maher;Dong Mei Zhang

  • An Integrated Software Environment for Building Design and Construction

    S. J. Fenves;U. Flemming;C. Hendrickson;M. L. Maher

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Gero
John S. Gero University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Pearl Pu
Pearl Pu École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Steven G. Rogelberg
Steven G. Rogelberg University of North Carolina at Charlotte
David R. Marchant
David R. Marchant Boston University
Chris Hendrickson
Chris Hendrickson Carnegie Mellon University
Bojan Cukic
Bojan Cukic University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Heng Li
Heng Li Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Ashok K. Goel
Ashok K. Goel Georgia Institute of Technology
Michael M. Cox
Michael M. Cox University of Wisconsin–Madison
Barbara Tversky
Barbara Tversky Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA unlocks a variety of related online degree and career opportunities. As technology shapes all industries, professionals often look to diversify their skill sets through flexible, affordable education options. For those pursuing leadership roles in the tech sector, exploring the cheapest executive mba programs online can be a cost-effective way to gain advanced business and management skills.

Beyond Computer Science, fields like library and information science are growing more digitally focused. An library science masters degree can open doors to roles in data management, digital archives, and information systems, all highly relevant in the tech-driven economy.

For those interested in broadening their expertise, numerous affordable online masters programs exist in technology, business, education, and related fields. These programs provide flexibility for working professionals and international students alike.

Ambitious learners who wish to reach the highest academic qualifications can also pursue the cheapest online doctorate in organizational leadership. Such a degree prepares graduates for executive positions, consulting, and advanced research roles across tech and business landscapes.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Lou Maher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles