World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amaresh Chakrabarti

Amaresh Chakrabarti

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
5969
World Ranking
3118
National Ranking
92

Amaresh Chakrabarti publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amaresh Chakrabarti sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 233 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Amaresh Chakrabarti D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amaresh Chakrabarti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design

    Unknown

  • Assessing design creativity

    Prabir Sarkar;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas

    Amaresh Chakrabarti;Prabir Sarkar;B. Leelavathamma;B. S. Nataraju

  • Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation

    Y.-C. Liu;A. Chakrabarti;T. Bligh

  • Computer-Based Design Synthesis Research: An Overview

    Amaresh Chakrabarti;Kristina Shea;Robert B. Stone;Jonathan Cagan

  • A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design

    Amaresh Chakrabarti;Thomas P Bligh

  • An approach to functional synthesis of mechanical design concepts : Theory, applications, and emerging research issues

    Amaresh Chakrabarti;Thomas P. Bligh

  • A methodology for supporting “transfer” in biomimetic design

    Julian Sartori;Ujjwal Pal;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes

    Prabir Sarkar;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • An Approach to Functional Synthesis of Solutions in Mechanical Conceptual Design. Part I: Introduction and Knowledge Representation

    Amaresh Chakrabarti;Thomas P. Bligh

  • Engineering design synthesis : understanding, approaches and tools

    Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods

    Vicente Chulvi;Elena Mulet;Amaresh Chakrabarti;Belinda López-Mesa

  • Investigating novelty–outcome relationships in engineering design

    V. Srinivasan;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • Special Issue: Representing functionality in design

    Amaresh Chakrabarti;Luciënne T. M. Blessing

  • Studying Engineering Design Creativity- Developing a Common Definition and Associated Measures

    P Sarkar;A Chakrabarti

  • Sapphire – an Approach to Analysis and Synthesis

    Srinivasan V;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • An Integrated Model of Designing

    V. Srinivasan;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • A New Approach to Structure Sharing

    Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • Development of a Method for Assessing Design Creativity

    Prabir Sarkar;Amaresh Chakrabarti

  • DEFINING AND SUPPORTING DESIGN CREATIVITY

    A. Chakrabarti

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Stone
Robert Stone Oregon State University
G. K. Ananthasuresh
G. K. Ananthasuresh Indian Institute of Science
David Dornfeld
David Dornfeld University of California, Berkeley
Kristin L. Wood
Kristin L. Wood University of Colorado Denver
Armand Hatchuel
Armand Hatchuel Mines ParisTech
Peter Fantke
Peter Fantke Technical University of Denmark
Cliff I. Davidson
Cliff I. Davidson Syracuse University
Barbara Tversky
Barbara Tversky Columbia University
Steven M. Smith
Steven M. Smith Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting and challenging career options, many students explore related fields through online degree programs. For those interested in blending engineering with human-centered skills, programs like the accredited easiest counseling degree programs provide a pathway to careers in mental health and support services.

Similarly, accelerated graduate programs such as the accelerated ABA program offer fast-track options for students aiming to engage in applied behavior analysis, a field with growing demand. Understanding program selectivity is important, especially in specialized areas like speech pathology. Insights into speech pathology grad school acceptance rates help prospective students gauge their application competitiveness.

For those seeking flexible entry points, exploring the easiest online SLP programs to get into can provide viable options to enter the field. Overall, combining technical expertise with complementary disciplines opens diverse career pathways and enhances employability in an evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Amaresh Chakrabarti