World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maria C. Yang

Maria C. Yang

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 32 3169 2976 1075 954 149 4046

Maria C. Yang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maria C. Yang between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria C. Yang published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 23 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1997 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maria C. Yang: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 0
2007 4
2008 2
2009 6
2010 8
2011 12
2012 10
2013 10
2014 17
2015 17
2016 7
2017 11
2018 7
2019 6
2020 9
2021 10
2022 7
2023 15
2024 11
2025 12
Total 192
Download as CSV

Maria C. Yang publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria C. Yang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 149 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155 149
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Maria C. Yang D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria C. Yang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144 32
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome

    Maria C. Yang

  • Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design

    Maria C. Yang

  • Bio-Inspired Design: An Overview Investigating Open Questions From the Broader Field of Design-by-Analogy

    Katherine Fu;Katherine Fu;Diana Moreno;Diana Moreno;Maria Yang;Kristin L. Wood

  • Fundamental studies in Design-by-Analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems

    Diana P. Moreno;Alberto A. Hernández;Maria C. Yang;Kevin N. Otto

  • Design Principles: Literature Review, Analysis, and Future Directions

    Katherine K. Fu;Maria C. Yang;Kristin L. Wood

  • An Analysis of Sketching Skill and Its Role in Early Stage Engineering Design

    Maria C. Yang;Jorge G. Cham

  • Design-by-analogy: experimental evaluation of a functional analogy search methodology for concept generation improvement

    Katherine Fu;Katherine Fu;Jeremy Murphy;Maria Yang;Kevin Otto

  • Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search

    Jeremy Murphy;Katherine Fu;Kevin Otto;Maria Yang

  • Connections between the design tool, design attributes, and user preferences in early stage design

    Anders Häggman;Geoff Tsai;Catherine Elsen;Tomonori Honda

  • A methodology for engineering ontology acquisition and validation

    Zhanjun Li;Maria c. Yang;Karthik Ramani

  • Design information retrieval: a thesauri-based approach for reuse of informal design information

    Maria C. Yang;William H. Wood;Mark R. Cutkosky

  • Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations With Design Outcome

    Maria C. Yang

  • The Role of Sketch Finish and Style in User Responses to Early Stage Design Concepts

    Bryan A. Macomber;Maria Yang

  • Building Fast to Think Faster: Exploiting Rapid Prototyping to Accelerate Ideation During Early Stage Design

    W. Lawrence Neeley;Kirsten Lim;April Zhu;Maria C. Yang

  • The Economies and Dimensionality of Design Prototyping: Value, Time, Cost and Fidelity (DETC2018-85747)

    Edward Tiong;Olivia Seow;Bradley A Camburn;Kenneth Teo

  • A study of the role of user-centered design methods in design team projects

    Justin Lai;Tomonori Honda;Maria c. Yang

  • Consensus and single leader decision-making in teams using structured design methods

    Maria C. Yang

  • Overcoming design fixation: Design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings

    Diana P. Moreno;Lucienne T. M. Blessing;Maria C. Yang;Alberto A. Hernández

  • A Step Beyond to Overcome Design Fixation: A Design-by-Analogy Approach

    Diana P. Moreno;Maria C. Yang;Alberto A. Hernández;Julie S. Linsey

  • Generative Design: Reframing the Role of the Designer in Early-Stage Design Process

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristin L. Wood
Kristin L. Wood University of Colorado Denver
Karthik Ramani
Karthik Ramani Purdue University West Lafayette
Francesco Ciucci
Francesco Ciucci Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Kevin Otto
Kevin Otto Aalto University
Syed M. Zubair
Syed M. Zubair King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Kemper Lewis
Kemper Lewis University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Mark R. Cutkosky
Mark R. Cutkosky Stanford University
Kenneth B. K. Teo
Kenneth B. K. Teo Aixtron (United Kingdom)

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, several online degrees offer promising career pathways. For example, pursuing an accelerated aba program can be an excellent option for those interested in applied psychology and behavioral analysis. These programs are designed for efficiency, helping students enter the workforce faster with specialized skills.

Another growing field connected to engineering and human factors is speech pathology. Understanding the speech pathology grad school acceptance rates is crucial for prospective students, as these rates affect program availability and competitiveness. Choosing the right program can make a substantial difference in admission success.

If you are considering related fields, exploring communication sciences and disorders programs may be beneficial. These programs have varied levels of selectivity, which can influence your decision based on your academic background and career goals.

Finally, the financial aspect remains a key concern. Comparing online speech pathology degree tuition across institutions helps prospective students find affordable options without compromising the quality of education. This consideration is essential for planning your educational journey effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Maria C. Yang

Recently Published Articles